Cargando…
Teleconference versus Face-to-Face Scientific Peer Review of Grant Application: Effects on Review Outcomes
Teleconferencing as a setting for scientific peer review is an attractive option for funding agencies, given the substantial environmental and cost savings. Despite this, there is a paucity of published data validating teleconference-based peer review compared to the face-to-face process. Our aim wa...
Autores principales: | Gallo, Stephen A., Carpenter, Afton S., Glisson, Scott R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740535/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23951223 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071693 |
Ejemplares similares
-
A retrospective analysis of the effect of discussion in teleconference and face-to-face scientific peer-review panels
por: Carpenter, Afton S, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Grant Review Feedback: Appropriateness and Usefulness
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
The Validation of Peer Review through Research Impact Measures and the Implications for Funding Strategies
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Grant reviewer perceptions of the quality, effectiveness, and influence of panel discussion
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
The Influence of Peer Reviewer Expertise on the Evaluation of Research Funding Applications
por: Gallo, Stephen A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)