Cargando…

Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques

BACKGROUND: Sealers are used to attain an impervious seal between the core material and root canal walls. AIM: To compare the depth and percentage of sealer penetration with three different placement techniques using confocal laser scanning microscopy as the evaluative tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: R...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikhil, Vineeta, Singh, Renuka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956528
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.114348
_version_ 1782280161878605824
author Nikhil, Vineeta
Singh, Renuka
author_facet Nikhil, Vineeta
Singh, Renuka
author_sort Nikhil, Vineeta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sealers are used to attain an impervious seal between the core material and root canal walls. AIM: To compare the depth and percentage of sealer penetration with three different placement techniques using confocal laser scanning microscopy as the evaluative tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of 30 single-rooted teeth were prepared to a size of F3 and AH plus sealer with Rhodamine B was applied with Ultlrasonic file (Gr-1), lentulospiral (Gr-2), and Endoactivator (Gr-3). Canals were obturated with gutta-percha. The roots were sectioned at the 3 and 6-mm levels from the apical foramen and were examined on a confocal microscope. RESULTS: A statistical significant differences among Gr-1, Gr-2, and Gr-3 were found at the 3 and 6-mm level (P < 0.05; ANOVA-Tukey tests) for the depth and percentage of sealer penetration except for Gr-1 and Gr-2 at 3-mm level. Gr-1 showed maximum mean depth of penetration (810 μm) and maximum mean percentage of sealer penetration (64.5) while Gr-3 showed minimum mean depth of penetration (112.7 μm) and minimum mean percentage of sealer penetration (26.7). CONCLUSION: Depth and percentage of penetration of sealer is influenced by the type of placement technique and by the root canal level with penetration decreasing apically.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3740637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37406372013-08-16 Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques Nikhil, Vineeta Singh, Renuka J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: Sealers are used to attain an impervious seal between the core material and root canal walls. AIM: To compare the depth and percentage of sealer penetration with three different placement techniques using confocal laser scanning microscopy as the evaluative tool. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Root canals of 30 single-rooted teeth were prepared to a size of F3 and AH plus sealer with Rhodamine B was applied with Ultlrasonic file (Gr-1), lentulospiral (Gr-2), and Endoactivator (Gr-3). Canals were obturated with gutta-percha. The roots were sectioned at the 3 and 6-mm levels from the apical foramen and were examined on a confocal microscope. RESULTS: A statistical significant differences among Gr-1, Gr-2, and Gr-3 were found at the 3 and 6-mm level (P < 0.05; ANOVA-Tukey tests) for the depth and percentage of sealer penetration except for Gr-1 and Gr-2 at 3-mm level. Gr-1 showed maximum mean depth of penetration (810 μm) and maximum mean percentage of sealer penetration (64.5) while Gr-3 showed minimum mean depth of penetration (112.7 μm) and minimum mean percentage of sealer penetration (26.7). CONCLUSION: Depth and percentage of penetration of sealer is influenced by the type of placement technique and by the root canal level with penetration decreasing apically. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3740637/ /pubmed/23956528 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.114348 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Conservative Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nikhil, Vineeta
Singh, Renuka
Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
title Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
title_full Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
title_fullStr Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
title_full_unstemmed Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
title_short Confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
title_sort confocal laser scanning microscopic investigation of ultrasonic, sonic, and rotary sealer placement techniques
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3740637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23956528
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.114348
work_keys_str_mv AT nikhilvineeta confocallaserscanningmicroscopicinvestigationofultrasonicsonicandrotarysealerplacementtechniques
AT singhrenuka confocallaserscanningmicroscopicinvestigationofultrasonicsonicandrotarysealerplacementtechniques