Cargando…

Handheld computers in critical care

BACKGROUND: Computing technology has the potential to improve health care management but is often underutilized. Handheld computers are versatile and relatively inexpensive, bringing the benefits of computers to the bedside. We evaluated the role of this technology for managing patient data and acce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lapinsky, Stephen E, Weshler, Jason, Mehta, Sangeeta, Varkul, Mark, Hallett, Dave, Stewart, Thomas E
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2001
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC37409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11511337
_version_ 1782120020492419072
author Lapinsky, Stephen E
Weshler, Jason
Mehta, Sangeeta
Varkul, Mark
Hallett, Dave
Stewart, Thomas E
author_facet Lapinsky, Stephen E
Weshler, Jason
Mehta, Sangeeta
Varkul, Mark
Hallett, Dave
Stewart, Thomas E
author_sort Lapinsky, Stephen E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computing technology has the potential to improve health care management but is often underutilized. Handheld computers are versatile and relatively inexpensive, bringing the benefits of computers to the bedside. We evaluated the role of this technology for managing patient data and accessing medical reference information, in an academic intensive-care unit (ICU). METHODS: Palm III series handheld devices were given to the ICU team, each installed with medical reference information, schedules, and contact numbers. Users underwent a 1-hour training session introducing the hardware and software. Various patient data management applications were assessed during the study period. Qualitative assessment of the benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions was performed by an independent company, using focus groups. An objective comparison between a paper and electronic handheld textbook was achieved using clinical scenario tests. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, the 20 physicians and 6 paramedical staff who used the handheld devices found them convenient and functional but suggested more comprehensive training and improved search facilities. Comparison of the handheld computer with the conventional paper text revealed equivalence. Access to computerized patient information improved communication, particularly with regard to long-stay patients, but changes to the software and the process were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of this technology was well received despite differences in users' familiarity with the devices. Handheld computers have potential in the ICU, but systems need to be developed specifically for the critical-care environment.
format Text
id pubmed-37409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2001
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-374092001-08-20 Handheld computers in critical care Lapinsky, Stephen E Weshler, Jason Mehta, Sangeeta Varkul, Mark Hallett, Dave Stewart, Thomas E Crit Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Computing technology has the potential to improve health care management but is often underutilized. Handheld computers are versatile and relatively inexpensive, bringing the benefits of computers to the bedside. We evaluated the role of this technology for managing patient data and accessing medical reference information, in an academic intensive-care unit (ICU). METHODS: Palm III series handheld devices were given to the ICU team, each installed with medical reference information, schedules, and contact numbers. Users underwent a 1-hour training session introducing the hardware and software. Various patient data management applications were assessed during the study period. Qualitative assessment of the benefits, drawbacks, and suggestions was performed by an independent company, using focus groups. An objective comparison between a paper and electronic handheld textbook was achieved using clinical scenario tests. RESULTS: During the 6-month study period, the 20 physicians and 6 paramedical staff who used the handheld devices found them convenient and functional but suggested more comprehensive training and improved search facilities. Comparison of the handheld computer with the conventional paper text revealed equivalence. Access to computerized patient information improved communication, particularly with regard to long-stay patients, but changes to the software and the process were suggested. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of this technology was well received despite differences in users' familiarity with the devices. Handheld computers have potential in the ICU, but systems need to be developed specifically for the critical-care environment. BioMed Central 2001 2001-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC37409/ /pubmed/11511337 Text en Copyright © 2001 Lapinsky et al, licensee BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Research Article
Lapinsky, Stephen E
Weshler, Jason
Mehta, Sangeeta
Varkul, Mark
Hallett, Dave
Stewart, Thomas E
Handheld computers in critical care
title Handheld computers in critical care
title_full Handheld computers in critical care
title_fullStr Handheld computers in critical care
title_full_unstemmed Handheld computers in critical care
title_short Handheld computers in critical care
title_sort handheld computers in critical care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC37409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11511337
work_keys_str_mv AT lapinskystephene handheldcomputersincriticalcare
AT weshlerjason handheldcomputersincriticalcare
AT mehtasangeeta handheldcomputersincriticalcare
AT varkulmark handheldcomputersincriticalcare
AT hallettdave handheldcomputersincriticalcare
AT stewartthomase handheldcomputersincriticalcare