Cargando…

Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm

PURPOSE: To develop a patient reported outcome measure of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb. METHODS: Potential items for inclusion were identified through (a) systematic review and analysis of existing measures and (b) analysis of the primary goals for treatment in a spastic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ashford, Stephen, Slade, Mike, Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa UK Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23294435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.743602
_version_ 1782280187623243776
author Ashford, Stephen
Slade, Mike
Turner-Stokes, Lynne
author_facet Ashford, Stephen
Slade, Mike
Turner-Stokes, Lynne
author_sort Ashford, Stephen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop a patient reported outcome measure of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb. METHODS: Potential items for inclusion were identified through (a) systematic review and analysis of existing measures and (b) analysis of the primary goals for treatment in a spasticity service. Item reduction was achieved through consultation with a small, purposively selected multi-disciplinary group of experienced rehabilitation professionals (n = 10) in a three-round Delphi process. This was followed by a confirmatory survey with a larger group of clinicians (n = 36) and patients and carers (n = 13 pairs). RESULTS: From an initial shortlist of 75 items, 23 items were initially identified for inclusion in the arm activity measure (ArmA), and subsequently refined to a 20-item instrument comprising 7 passive and 13 active function. In common with the six measures identified in the systematic review, a five-point ordinal scaling structure was chosen, with ratings based on activity over the preceding 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: The ArmA is designed to measure passive and active function following focal interventions for the hemiparetic upper limb. Content and face validity have initially been addressed within the development process. The next phase of development has involved formal evaluation of psychometric properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: In clinical practice or research, outcome measures in rehabilitation need to have face and content validity. Following stroke or brain injury, goals for rehabilitation of the hemiparetic upper limb may be: to restore active function, if there is return of motor control or to improve passive function making it easier to care for the limb (e.g. maintain hygiene) if no motor return is possible, measurement of both constructs should be considered. This study describes the systematic development of the ArmA, a measure of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3741014
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa UK Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37410142013-08-13 Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm Ashford, Stephen Slade, Mike Turner-Stokes, Lynne Disabil Rehabil Research Article PURPOSE: To develop a patient reported outcome measure of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb. METHODS: Potential items for inclusion were identified through (a) systematic review and analysis of existing measures and (b) analysis of the primary goals for treatment in a spasticity service. Item reduction was achieved through consultation with a small, purposively selected multi-disciplinary group of experienced rehabilitation professionals (n = 10) in a three-round Delphi process. This was followed by a confirmatory survey with a larger group of clinicians (n = 36) and patients and carers (n = 13 pairs). RESULTS: From an initial shortlist of 75 items, 23 items were initially identified for inclusion in the arm activity measure (ArmA), and subsequently refined to a 20-item instrument comprising 7 passive and 13 active function. In common with the six measures identified in the systematic review, a five-point ordinal scaling structure was chosen, with ratings based on activity over the preceding 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: The ArmA is designed to measure passive and active function following focal interventions for the hemiparetic upper limb. Content and face validity have initially been addressed within the development process. The next phase of development has involved formal evaluation of psychometric properties. IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION: In clinical practice or research, outcome measures in rehabilitation need to have face and content validity. Following stroke or brain injury, goals for rehabilitation of the hemiparetic upper limb may be: to restore active function, if there is return of motor control or to improve passive function making it easier to care for the limb (e.g. maintain hygiene) if no motor return is possible, measurement of both constructs should be considered. This study describes the systematic development of the ArmA, a measure of active and passive function in the hemiparetic upper limb. Informa UK Ltd. 2013-08 2013-01-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3741014/ /pubmed/23294435 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.743602 Text en © 2013 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ashford, Stephen
Slade, Mike
Turner-Stokes, Lynne
Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
title Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
title_full Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
title_fullStr Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
title_full_unstemmed Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
title_short Conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (ArmA) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
title_sort conceptualisation and development of the arm activity measure (arma) for assessment of activity in the hemiparetic arm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741014/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23294435
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.743602
work_keys_str_mv AT ashfordstephen conceptualisationanddevelopmentofthearmactivitymeasurearmaforassessmentofactivityinthehemipareticarm
AT slademike conceptualisationanddevelopmentofthearmactivitymeasurearmaforassessmentofactivityinthehemipareticarm
AT turnerstokeslynne conceptualisationanddevelopmentofthearmactivitymeasurearmaforassessmentofactivityinthehemipareticarm