Cargando…

Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of fetal trisomy 21 (T21) screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of T21 cases detected, the number of invasive procedures performed,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Ken, Musci, Thomas J., Caughey, Aaron B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa UK Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23356557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.770464
_version_ 1782280189010509824
author Song, Ken
Musci, Thomas J.
Caughey, Aaron B.
author_facet Song, Ken
Musci, Thomas J.
Caughey, Aaron B.
author_sort Song, Ken
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of fetal trisomy 21 (T21) screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of T21 cases detected, the number of invasive procedures performed, corresponding euploid fetal losses and total costs for three screening strategies: first trimester combined screening (FTS), integrated screening (INT) or NIPT, whereby NIPT was performed in high-risk patients (women 35 years or older or women with a positive conventional screening test). Modeling was based on a 4 million pregnant women cohort in the US. RESULTS: NIPT, at a base case price of $795, was more clinically effective and less costly (dominant) over both FTS and INT. NIPT detected 4823 T21 cases based on 5330 invasive procedures. FTS detected 3364 T21 cases based on 108 364 procedures and INT detected 3760 cases based on 108 760 procedures. NIPT detected 28% and 43% more T21 cases compared to INT and FTS, respectively, while reducing invasive procedures by >95% and reducing euploid fetal losses by >99%. Total costs were $3786M with FTS, $3919M with INT and $3403M with NIPT. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT leads to improved T21 detection and reduction in euploid fetal loss at lower total healthcare expenditures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3741020
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa UK Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37410202013-08-22 Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population Song, Ken Musci, Thomas J. Caughey, Aaron B. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med Article OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of fetal trisomy 21 (T21) screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in high-risk pregnant women. METHODS: Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of T21 cases detected, the number of invasive procedures performed, corresponding euploid fetal losses and total costs for three screening strategies: first trimester combined screening (FTS), integrated screening (INT) or NIPT, whereby NIPT was performed in high-risk patients (women 35 years or older or women with a positive conventional screening test). Modeling was based on a 4 million pregnant women cohort in the US. RESULTS: NIPT, at a base case price of $795, was more clinically effective and less costly (dominant) over both FTS and INT. NIPT detected 4823 T21 cases based on 5330 invasive procedures. FTS detected 3364 T21 cases based on 108 364 procedures and INT detected 3760 cases based on 108 760 procedures. NIPT detected 28% and 43% more T21 cases compared to INT and FTS, respectively, while reducing invasive procedures by >95% and reducing euploid fetal losses by >99%. Total costs were $3786M with FTS, $3919M with INT and $3403M with NIPT. CONCLUSIONS: NIPT leads to improved T21 detection and reduction in euploid fetal loss at lower total healthcare expenditures. Informa UK Ltd. 2013-08 2013-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3741020/ /pubmed/23356557 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.770464 Text en © 2013 Informa UK Ltd. All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Article
Song, Ken
Musci, Thomas J.
Caughey, Aaron B.
Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population
title Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population
title_full Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population
title_fullStr Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population
title_full_unstemmed Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population
title_short Clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfDNA analysis in high-risk women based on a US population
title_sort clinical utility and cost of non-invasive prenatal testing with cfdna analysis in high-risk women based on a us population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741020/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23356557
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.770464
work_keys_str_mv AT songken clinicalutilityandcostofnoninvasiveprenataltestingwithcfdnaanalysisinhighriskwomenbasedonauspopulation
AT muscithomasj clinicalutilityandcostofnoninvasiveprenataltestingwithcfdnaanalysisinhighriskwomenbasedonauspopulation
AT caugheyaaronb clinicalutilityandcostofnoninvasiveprenataltestingwithcfdnaanalysisinhighriskwomenbasedonauspopulation