Cargando…
What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams
I propose a narrative fabrication thesis of dream reports, according to which dream reports are often not accurate representations of experiences that occur during sleep. I begin with an overview of anti-experience theses of Norman Malcolm and Daniel Dennett who reject the received view of dreams, t...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00514 |
_version_ | 1782280264917975040 |
---|---|
author | Rosen, Melanie G. |
author_facet | Rosen, Melanie G. |
author_sort | Rosen, Melanie G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | I propose a narrative fabrication thesis of dream reports, according to which dream reports are often not accurate representations of experiences that occur during sleep. I begin with an overview of anti-experience theses of Norman Malcolm and Daniel Dennett who reject the received view of dreams, that dreams are experiences we have during sleep which are reported upon waking. Although rejection of the first claim of the received view, that dreams are experiences that occur during sleep, is implausible, I evaluate in more detail the second assumption of the received view, that dream reports are generally accurate. I then propose a “narrative fabrication” view of dreams as an alternative to the received view. Dream reports are often confabulated or fabricated because of poor memory, bizarre dream content, and cognitive deficits. It is well documented that narratives can be altered between initial rapid eye movement sleep awakenings and subsequent reports. I argue that we have reason to suspect that initial reports are prone to inaccuracy. Experiments demonstrate that subjects rationalize strange elements in narratives, leaving out supernatural or bizarre components when reporting waking memories of stories. Inaccuracies in dream reports are exacerbated by rapid memory loss and bizarre dream content. Waking memory is a process of reconstruction and blending of elements, but unlike waking memory, we cannot reality-test for dream memories. Dream experiences involve imaginative elements, and dream content cannot be verified with external evidence. Some dreams may involve wake-like higher cognitive functions, such as lucid dreams. Such dreams are more likely to elicit accurate reports than cognitively deficient dreams. However, dream reports are generally less accurate than waking reports. I then propose methods which could verify the narrative fabrication view, and argue that although the theory cannot be tested with current methods, new techniques and technologies may be able to do so in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3741533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37415332013-08-20 What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams Rosen, Melanie G. Front Psychol Psychology I propose a narrative fabrication thesis of dream reports, according to which dream reports are often not accurate representations of experiences that occur during sleep. I begin with an overview of anti-experience theses of Norman Malcolm and Daniel Dennett who reject the received view of dreams, that dreams are experiences we have during sleep which are reported upon waking. Although rejection of the first claim of the received view, that dreams are experiences that occur during sleep, is implausible, I evaluate in more detail the second assumption of the received view, that dream reports are generally accurate. I then propose a “narrative fabrication” view of dreams as an alternative to the received view. Dream reports are often confabulated or fabricated because of poor memory, bizarre dream content, and cognitive deficits. It is well documented that narratives can be altered between initial rapid eye movement sleep awakenings and subsequent reports. I argue that we have reason to suspect that initial reports are prone to inaccuracy. Experiments demonstrate that subjects rationalize strange elements in narratives, leaving out supernatural or bizarre components when reporting waking memories of stories. Inaccuracies in dream reports are exacerbated by rapid memory loss and bizarre dream content. Waking memory is a process of reconstruction and blending of elements, but unlike waking memory, we cannot reality-test for dream memories. Dream experiences involve imaginative elements, and dream content cannot be verified with external evidence. Some dreams may involve wake-like higher cognitive functions, such as lucid dreams. Such dreams are more likely to elicit accurate reports than cognitively deficient dreams. However, dream reports are generally less accurate than waking reports. I then propose methods which could verify the narrative fabrication view, and argue that although the theory cannot be tested with current methods, new techniques and technologies may be able to do so in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3741533/ /pubmed/23964260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00514 Text en Copyright © Rosen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Rosen, Melanie G. What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
title | What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
title_full | What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
title_fullStr | What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
title_full_unstemmed | What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
title_short | What I make up when I wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
title_sort | what i make up when i wake up: anti-experience views and narrative fabrication of dreams |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3741533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23964260 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosenmelanieg whatimakeupwheniwakeupantiexperienceviewsandnarrativefabricationofdreams |