Cargando…
A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320 |
_version_ | 1782280357259771904 |
---|---|
author | Bunno, Maki Gouda, Kyosuke Yamahara, Kunihiro Kawaguchi, Masanori |
author_facet | Bunno, Maki Gouda, Kyosuke Yamahara, Kunihiro Kawaguchi, Masanori |
author_sort | Bunno, Maki |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration alone might not be sufficient for the ulcer to heal within 4 weeks. There is no report about the efficacy of post-ESD gastric ulcers by esomeprazole. We examined retrospectively the efficacy of a combination therapy of esomeprazole plus rebamipide, a mucosal-protective antiulcer drug, on the acceleration of post-ESD ulcer healing comparing with omeprazole plus rebamipide. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia. We conducted a case-control study to compare the healing rates within 4 weeks effected by esomeprazole plus rebamipide (group E) and omeprazole plus rebamipide (group O). The sizes of the artificial ulcers were divided into normal-sized or large-sized. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except age and sex. Stage S1 disease was observed in 27.6% and 38.7% of patients after 4 weeks of treatment in the group E and O, respectively. In large-sized artificial ulcers, the healing rate of stage S1 in group E is significantly higher than that in group O in 4 weeks.(25% VS 0%:P = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profiles of esomeprazole plus rebamipide and omeprazole and rebamipide are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers. In large-sized ulcers, esomeprazole plus rebamipide promotes ulcer healing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3742353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37423532013-08-21 A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers Bunno, Maki Gouda, Kyosuke Yamahara, Kunihiro Kawaguchi, Masanori Jpn Clin Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration alone might not be sufficient for the ulcer to heal within 4 weeks. There is no report about the efficacy of post-ESD gastric ulcers by esomeprazole. We examined retrospectively the efficacy of a combination therapy of esomeprazole plus rebamipide, a mucosal-protective antiulcer drug, on the acceleration of post-ESD ulcer healing comparing with omeprazole plus rebamipide. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia. We conducted a case-control study to compare the healing rates within 4 weeks effected by esomeprazole plus rebamipide (group E) and omeprazole plus rebamipide (group O). The sizes of the artificial ulcers were divided into normal-sized or large-sized. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except age and sex. Stage S1 disease was observed in 27.6% and 38.7% of patients after 4 weeks of treatment in the group E and O, respectively. In large-sized artificial ulcers, the healing rate of stage S1 in group E is significantly higher than that in group O in 4 weeks.(25% VS 0%:P = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profiles of esomeprazole plus rebamipide and omeprazole and rebamipide are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers. In large-sized ulcers, esomeprazole plus rebamipide promotes ulcer healing. Libertas Academica 2013-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3742353/ /pubmed/23966811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Bunno, Maki Gouda, Kyosuke Yamahara, Kunihiro Kawaguchi, Masanori A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers |
title | A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers |
title_full | A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers |
title_fullStr | A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers |
title_full_unstemmed | A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers |
title_short | A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers |
title_sort | case-control study of esomeprazole plus rebamipide vs. omeprazole plus rebamipide on post-esd gastric ulcers |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bunnomaki acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT goudakyosuke acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT yamaharakunihiro acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT kawaguchimasanori acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT bunnomaki casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT goudakyosuke casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT yamaharakunihiro casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers AT kawaguchimasanori casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers |