Cargando…

A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bunno, Maki, Gouda, Kyosuke, Yamahara, Kunihiro, Kawaguchi, Masanori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966811
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320
_version_ 1782280357259771904
author Bunno, Maki
Gouda, Kyosuke
Yamahara, Kunihiro
Kawaguchi, Masanori
author_facet Bunno, Maki
Gouda, Kyosuke
Yamahara, Kunihiro
Kawaguchi, Masanori
author_sort Bunno, Maki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration alone might not be sufficient for the ulcer to heal within 4 weeks. There is no report about the efficacy of post-ESD gastric ulcers by esomeprazole. We examined retrospectively the efficacy of a combination therapy of esomeprazole plus rebamipide, a mucosal-protective antiulcer drug, on the acceleration of post-ESD ulcer healing comparing with omeprazole plus rebamipide. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia. We conducted a case-control study to compare the healing rates within 4 weeks effected by esomeprazole plus rebamipide (group E) and omeprazole plus rebamipide (group O). The sizes of the artificial ulcers were divided into normal-sized or large-sized. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except age and sex. Stage S1 disease was observed in 27.6% and 38.7% of patients after 4 weeks of treatment in the group E and O, respectively. In large-sized artificial ulcers, the healing rate of stage S1 in group E is significantly higher than that in group O in 4 weeks.(25% VS 0%:P = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profiles of esomeprazole plus rebamipide and omeprazole and rebamipide are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers. In large-sized ulcers, esomeprazole plus rebamipide promotes ulcer healing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3742353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37423532013-08-21 A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers Bunno, Maki Gouda, Kyosuke Yamahara, Kunihiro Kawaguchi, Masanori Jpn Clin Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is useful for treating gastric tumors. Several trials have shown the efficacy of 4 or 8 weeks of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) administration for post-ESD ulcers. However, if the size of the post-ESD ulcer is larger than predicted, PPI administration alone might not be sufficient for the ulcer to heal within 4 weeks. There is no report about the efficacy of post-ESD gastric ulcers by esomeprazole. We examined retrospectively the efficacy of a combination therapy of esomeprazole plus rebamipide, a mucosal-protective antiulcer drug, on the acceleration of post-ESD ulcer healing comparing with omeprazole plus rebamipide. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia. We conducted a case-control study to compare the healing rates within 4 weeks effected by esomeprazole plus rebamipide (group E) and omeprazole plus rebamipide (group O). The sizes of the artificial ulcers were divided into normal-sized or large-sized. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between the two groups except age and sex. Stage S1 disease was observed in 27.6% and 38.7% of patients after 4 weeks of treatment in the group E and O, respectively. In large-sized artificial ulcers, the healing rate of stage S1 in group E is significantly higher than that in group O in 4 weeks.(25% VS 0%:P = 0.02) CONCLUSIONS: The safety and efficacy profiles of esomeprazole plus rebamipide and omeprazole and rebamipide are similar for the treatment of ESD-induced ulcers. In large-sized ulcers, esomeprazole plus rebamipide promotes ulcer healing. Libertas Academica 2013-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3742353/ /pubmed/23966811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bunno, Maki
Gouda, Kyosuke
Yamahara, Kunihiro
Kawaguchi, Masanori
A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
title A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
title_full A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
title_fullStr A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
title_full_unstemmed A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
title_short A Case-Control Study of Esomeprazole Plus Rebamipide vs. Omeprazole Plus Rebamipide on Post-ESD Gastric Ulcers
title_sort case-control study of esomeprazole plus rebamipide vs. omeprazole plus rebamipide on post-esd gastric ulcers
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966811
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JCM.S11320
work_keys_str_mv AT bunnomaki acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT goudakyosuke acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT yamaharakunihiro acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT kawaguchimasanori acasecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT bunnomaki casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT goudakyosuke casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT yamaharakunihiro casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers
AT kawaguchimasanori casecontrolstudyofesomeprazoleplusrebamipidevsomeprazoleplusrebamipideonpostesdgastriculcers