Cargando…
Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai
BACKGROUND: The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, although closely linked with CPT-11-related adverse effects, cannot be used alone to guide individualized treatment decisions. However, CPT-11 dosage can be adjusted according to measured SN-38 pharmacokinetics. Our study is designed to investigate whether the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1480-7 |
_version_ | 1782280364800081920 |
---|---|
author | Cai, Xun Cao, Weiguo Ding, Honghua Liu, Tianshu Zhou, Xinli Wang, Mei Zhong, Ming Zhao, Ziyi Xu, Qing Wang, Liwei |
author_facet | Cai, Xun Cao, Weiguo Ding, Honghua Liu, Tianshu Zhou, Xinli Wang, Mei Zhong, Ming Zhao, Ziyi Xu, Qing Wang, Liwei |
author_sort | Cai, Xun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, although closely linked with CPT-11-related adverse effects, cannot be used alone to guide individualized treatment decisions. However, CPT-11 dosage can be adjusted according to measured SN-38 pharmacokinetics. Our study is designed to investigate whether there is a relationship between SN-38 peak or valley concentrations and efficacy or adverse effects of CPT-11-based chemotherapy. We retrospectively studied 98 patients treated with advanced colorectal cancer in various UGT1A1*28 genotype groups (mainly (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotypes) treated with CPT-11 as first-line chemotherapy in Shanghai. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four advanced colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. To understand differences in genotype expression, the frequency of UGT1A1*28 thymine–adenine (TA) repeats in TATA box arrangement was assessed by PCR with genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. For ninety-eight cases with the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotypes treated with CPT-11 as first-line chemotherapy, the plasma concentration of SN-38 was detected by HPLC 1.5 and 49 h after CPT-11 infusion. Efficacy and adverse effects were observed subsequently, and the relationship between SN-38 plasma concentration and efficacy or adverse effects within genotype groups, as well as differences in efficacy and adverse effects between (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotypes were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients (69.51 %) were identified with the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype, forty-eight patients (29.27 %) with the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype, and two patients (1.22 %) with the (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) genotype. The average peak and valley concentrations of SN-38 after CPT-11 infusion and plasma bilirubin average levels before and after CPT-11 treatment in the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype group were all higher than those in (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00). Stepwise regression analysis showed that SN-38 peak and valley concentration was correlated with PFS in the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype. In the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) group, SN-38 peak concentration was correlated with CPT-11 starting dose and OS, valley concentration correlated with plasma bilirubin levels before CPT-11 treatment, delayed diarrhea, and OS. For the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype, mPFS of the SN-38 peak concentration >43.2 ng/ml subgroup was significantly longer than that of ≤43.2 ng/ml subgroup (8.0 ± 0.35 vs. 6.5 ± 0.79 months, χ (2) = 17.18, p = 0.00) with a relatively high incidence of Grade I/II° myelosuppression; for the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype, there was no significant difference in mOS between the SN-38 valley concentration >16.83 ng/ml and ≤16.83 subgroups (17.3 ± 0.45 vs. 18.8 ± 0.50 months, χ (2) = 1.38, p = 0.24), but the former had a higher incidence of Grade III/IV° mucositis and delayed diarrhea. For 2 (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) cases, although 25 % dose reduction of CPT-11, which is calculated according to body surface area, Grade IV° bone marrow suppression and Grade III° delayed diarrhea still occurred after CPT-11 treatment, though both adverse effects resolved and did not recur again after a 50 % dose reduction. CONCLUSION: The (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype accounted for the most, and (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) genotype only account for a very small portion of advanced colorectal cancer patients in Shanghai. For the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype, CPT-11 dosage can be increased gradually to improve efficacy for patients with SN-38 peak concentration ≤43.2 ng/ml after CPT-11 infusion; and for (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype patients, CPT-11 dosage may be lowered appropriately to reduce serious adverse effects such as bone marrow suppression and delayed diarrhea without affecting the efficacy for those with SN-38 valley concentration >16.83 ng/ml. For (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) genotype patients, adverse effects should be closely observed after treatment even if CPT-11 dosage has been reduced. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3742415 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37424152013-08-14 Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai Cai, Xun Cao, Weiguo Ding, Honghua Liu, Tianshu Zhou, Xinli Wang, Mei Zhong, Ming Zhao, Ziyi Xu, Qing Wang, Liwei J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Paper BACKGROUND: The UGT1A1*28 polymorphism, although closely linked with CPT-11-related adverse effects, cannot be used alone to guide individualized treatment decisions. However, CPT-11 dosage can be adjusted according to measured SN-38 pharmacokinetics. Our study is designed to investigate whether there is a relationship between SN-38 peak or valley concentrations and efficacy or adverse effects of CPT-11-based chemotherapy. We retrospectively studied 98 patients treated with advanced colorectal cancer in various UGT1A1*28 genotype groups (mainly (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotypes) treated with CPT-11 as first-line chemotherapy in Shanghai. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four advanced colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. To understand differences in genotype expression, the frequency of UGT1A1*28 thymine–adenine (TA) repeats in TATA box arrangement was assessed by PCR with genomic DNA extracted from peripheral blood. For ninety-eight cases with the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotypes treated with CPT-11 as first-line chemotherapy, the plasma concentration of SN-38 was detected by HPLC 1.5 and 49 h after CPT-11 infusion. Efficacy and adverse effects were observed subsequently, and the relationship between SN-38 plasma concentration and efficacy or adverse effects within genotype groups, as well as differences in efficacy and adverse effects between (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotypes were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: One hundred and fourteen patients (69.51 %) were identified with the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype, forty-eight patients (29.27 %) with the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype, and two patients (1.22 %) with the (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) genotype. The average peak and valley concentrations of SN-38 after CPT-11 infusion and plasma bilirubin average levels before and after CPT-11 treatment in the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype group were all higher than those in (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00). Stepwise regression analysis showed that SN-38 peak and valley concentration was correlated with PFS in the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype. In the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) group, SN-38 peak concentration was correlated with CPT-11 starting dose and OS, valley concentration correlated with plasma bilirubin levels before CPT-11 treatment, delayed diarrhea, and OS. For the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype, mPFS of the SN-38 peak concentration >43.2 ng/ml subgroup was significantly longer than that of ≤43.2 ng/ml subgroup (8.0 ± 0.35 vs. 6.5 ± 0.79 months, χ (2) = 17.18, p = 0.00) with a relatively high incidence of Grade I/II° myelosuppression; for the (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype, there was no significant difference in mOS between the SN-38 valley concentration >16.83 ng/ml and ≤16.83 subgroups (17.3 ± 0.45 vs. 18.8 ± 0.50 months, χ (2) = 1.38, p = 0.24), but the former had a higher incidence of Grade III/IV° mucositis and delayed diarrhea. For 2 (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) cases, although 25 % dose reduction of CPT-11, which is calculated according to body surface area, Grade IV° bone marrow suppression and Grade III° delayed diarrhea still occurred after CPT-11 treatment, though both adverse effects resolved and did not recur again after a 50 % dose reduction. CONCLUSION: The (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype and (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype accounted for the most, and (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) genotype only account for a very small portion of advanced colorectal cancer patients in Shanghai. For the (TA)(6)/(TA)(6) genotype, CPT-11 dosage can be increased gradually to improve efficacy for patients with SN-38 peak concentration ≤43.2 ng/ml after CPT-11 infusion; and for (TA)(6)/(TA)(7) genotype patients, CPT-11 dosage may be lowered appropriately to reduce serious adverse effects such as bone marrow suppression and delayed diarrhea without affecting the efficacy for those with SN-38 valley concentration >16.83 ng/ml. For (TA)(7)/(TA)(7) genotype patients, adverse effects should be closely observed after treatment even if CPT-11 dosage has been reduced. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2013-07-28 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3742415/ /pubmed/23892411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1480-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Cai, Xun Cao, Weiguo Ding, Honghua Liu, Tianshu Zhou, Xinli Wang, Mei Zhong, Ming Zhao, Ziyi Xu, Qing Wang, Liwei Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai |
title | Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai |
title_full | Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai |
title_fullStr | Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai |
title_short | Analysis of UGT1A1*28 genotype and SN-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in Shanghai |
title_sort | analysis of ugt1a1*28 genotype and sn-38 pharmacokinetics for irinotecan-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: results from a multicenter, retrospective study in shanghai |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742415/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23892411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1480-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caixun analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT caoweiguo analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT dinghonghua analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT liutianshu analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT zhouxinli analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT wangmei analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT zhongming analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT zhaoziyi analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT xuqing analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai AT wangliwei analysisofugt1a128genotypeandsn38pharmacokineticsforirinotecanbasedchemotherapyinpatientswithadvancedcolorectalcancerresultsfromamulticenterretrospectivestudyinshanghai |