Cargando…

Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an increasingly popular technique for examining neurobiology in rodents because it is both noninvasive and nondestructive. MRI scans can be acquired from either live or post mortem specimens. In vivo scans have a key advantage in that subjects can be scanned at mu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oguz, Ipek, Yaxley, Richard, Budin, Francois, Hoogstoel, Marion, Lee, Joohwi, Maltbie, Eric, Liu, Wen, Crews, Fulton T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071027
_version_ 1782280405215346688
author Oguz, Ipek
Yaxley, Richard
Budin, Francois
Hoogstoel, Marion
Lee, Joohwi
Maltbie, Eric
Liu, Wen
Crews, Fulton T.
author_facet Oguz, Ipek
Yaxley, Richard
Budin, Francois
Hoogstoel, Marion
Lee, Joohwi
Maltbie, Eric
Liu, Wen
Crews, Fulton T.
author_sort Oguz, Ipek
collection PubMed
description Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an increasingly popular technique for examining neurobiology in rodents because it is both noninvasive and nondestructive. MRI scans can be acquired from either live or post mortem specimens. In vivo scans have a key advantage in that subjects can be scanned at multiple time-points in longitudinal studies. However, repeated exposure to anesthesia and stress may confound studies. In contrast, post mortem scans offer improved image quality and increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to several key advantages: First, the images are not disrupted by motion and pulsation artifacts. Second, they allow the brain tissue to be perfused with contrast agents, enhancing tissue contrast. Third, they allow longer image acquisition times, yielding higher resolution and/or improved SNR. Fourth, they allow assessment of groups of animals at the same age without scheduling complications. Despite these advantages, researchers are often skeptical of post mortem MRI scans because of uncertainty about whether the fixation process alters the MRI measurements. To address these concerns, we present a thorough comparative study of in vivo and post mortem MRI scans in healthy male Wistar rats at three age points throughout adolescence (postnatal days 28 through 80). For each subject, an in vivo scan was acquired, followed by perfusion and two post mortem scans at two different MRI facilities. The goal was to assess robustness of measurements, to detect any changes in volumetric measurements after fixation, and to investigate any differential bias that may exist between image acquisition techniques. We present this volumetric analysis for comparison of 22 anatomical structures between in vivo and post mortem scans. No significant changes in volumetric measurements were detected; however, as hypothesized, the image quality is dramatically improved in post mortem scans. These findings illustrate the validity and utility of using post mortem scans in volumetric neurobiological studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3742751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37427512013-08-21 Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains Oguz, Ipek Yaxley, Richard Budin, Francois Hoogstoel, Marion Lee, Joohwi Maltbie, Eric Liu, Wen Crews, Fulton T. PLoS One Research Article Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is an increasingly popular technique for examining neurobiology in rodents because it is both noninvasive and nondestructive. MRI scans can be acquired from either live or post mortem specimens. In vivo scans have a key advantage in that subjects can be scanned at multiple time-points in longitudinal studies. However, repeated exposure to anesthesia and stress may confound studies. In contrast, post mortem scans offer improved image quality and increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) due to several key advantages: First, the images are not disrupted by motion and pulsation artifacts. Second, they allow the brain tissue to be perfused with contrast agents, enhancing tissue contrast. Third, they allow longer image acquisition times, yielding higher resolution and/or improved SNR. Fourth, they allow assessment of groups of animals at the same age without scheduling complications. Despite these advantages, researchers are often skeptical of post mortem MRI scans because of uncertainty about whether the fixation process alters the MRI measurements. To address these concerns, we present a thorough comparative study of in vivo and post mortem MRI scans in healthy male Wistar rats at three age points throughout adolescence (postnatal days 28 through 80). For each subject, an in vivo scan was acquired, followed by perfusion and two post mortem scans at two different MRI facilities. The goal was to assess robustness of measurements, to detect any changes in volumetric measurements after fixation, and to investigate any differential bias that may exist between image acquisition techniques. We present this volumetric analysis for comparison of 22 anatomical structures between in vivo and post mortem scans. No significant changes in volumetric measurements were detected; however, as hypothesized, the image quality is dramatically improved in post mortem scans. These findings illustrate the validity and utility of using post mortem scans in volumetric neurobiological studies. Public Library of Science 2013-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3742751/ /pubmed/23967148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071027 Text en © 2013 Oguz et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Oguz, Ipek
Yaxley, Richard
Budin, Francois
Hoogstoel, Marion
Lee, Joohwi
Maltbie, Eric
Liu, Wen
Crews, Fulton T.
Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains
title Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains
title_full Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains
title_fullStr Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains
title_short Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Live vs. Post Mortem Rat Brains
title_sort comparison of magnetic resonance imaging in live vs. post mortem rat brains
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071027
work_keys_str_mv AT oguzipek comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT yaxleyrichard comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT budinfrancois comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT hoogstoelmarion comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT leejoohwi comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT maltbieeric comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT liuwen comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains
AT crewsfultont comparisonofmagneticresonanceimaginginlivevspostmortemratbrains