Cargando…

The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals

PURPOSE: To investigate four different contrast protocols to detect hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most adaptable for patients at any body weight (BW) in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post-marketing surveillance of liver dynamic CT was prospectively performed by four diff...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Okada, Masahiro, Kondo, Hiroshi, Sou, Hironobu, Murakami, Takamichi, Kanematsu, Masayuki, Ichikawa, Tomoaki, Yoshikawa, Shushi, Shiosakai, Kazuhito, Hayakawa, Akiko, Awai, Kazuo, Yoshimitsu, Kengo, Yamashita, Yasuyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-367
_version_ 1782280425069084672
author Okada, Masahiro
Kondo, Hiroshi
Sou, Hironobu
Murakami, Takamichi
Kanematsu, Masayuki
Ichikawa, Tomoaki
Yoshikawa, Shushi
Shiosakai, Kazuhito
Hayakawa, Akiko
Awai, Kazuo
Yoshimitsu, Kengo
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
author_facet Okada, Masahiro
Kondo, Hiroshi
Sou, Hironobu
Murakami, Takamichi
Kanematsu, Masayuki
Ichikawa, Tomoaki
Yoshikawa, Shushi
Shiosakai, Kazuhito
Hayakawa, Akiko
Awai, Kazuo
Yoshimitsu, Kengo
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
author_sort Okada, Masahiro
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate four different contrast protocols to detect hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most adaptable for patients at any body weight (BW) in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post-marketing surveillance of liver dynamic CT was prospectively performed by four different protocols in 415 patients: Protocol-A, BW-tailored dose of contrast media (CM: iohexol 300 mgI/mL), fixed injection duration (30s), fixed scan timing at arterial phase (AP); Protocol-B, BW-tailored dose of CM, fixed injection duration (30s), by bolus tracking; Protocol-C, BW-tailored dose of CM, fixed injection flow rate, by bolus tracking; Protocol-D, 100 mL constant of CM at any BW, fixed scan timing. Scan timing and tumor conspicuity at AP was scored qualitatively. The quantitative CT values of aorta and tumor liver contrast (TLC) were obtained. RESULTS: The qualitative rate assessed “good” as scan timing of AP in Protocol-C was significantly lower than those in Protocols A and D (difference:16.6%, 17.4%, P = 0.0069, P = 0.0140, respectively). Scatter plot of Protocol-D (R(2) = 0.1283) at AP showed significant inverse relationship between TLC and BW (P =0.0053), although not significant in Protocols A, B, C. CONCLUSION: In patients with higher BW, protocols of BW-tailored dose of CM and/or fixed injection duration have no dependence on BW to diagnose hypervascular HCCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-367) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3742842
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37428422013-08-14 The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals Okada, Masahiro Kondo, Hiroshi Sou, Hironobu Murakami, Takamichi Kanematsu, Masayuki Ichikawa, Tomoaki Yoshikawa, Shushi Shiosakai, Kazuhito Hayakawa, Akiko Awai, Kazuo Yoshimitsu, Kengo Yamashita, Yasuyuki Springerplus Research PURPOSE: To investigate four different contrast protocols to detect hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) most adaptable for patients at any body weight (BW) in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A post-marketing surveillance of liver dynamic CT was prospectively performed by four different protocols in 415 patients: Protocol-A, BW-tailored dose of contrast media (CM: iohexol 300 mgI/mL), fixed injection duration (30s), fixed scan timing at arterial phase (AP); Protocol-B, BW-tailored dose of CM, fixed injection duration (30s), by bolus tracking; Protocol-C, BW-tailored dose of CM, fixed injection flow rate, by bolus tracking; Protocol-D, 100 mL constant of CM at any BW, fixed scan timing. Scan timing and tumor conspicuity at AP was scored qualitatively. The quantitative CT values of aorta and tumor liver contrast (TLC) were obtained. RESULTS: The qualitative rate assessed “good” as scan timing of AP in Protocol-C was significantly lower than those in Protocols A and D (difference:16.6%, 17.4%, P = 0.0069, P = 0.0140, respectively). Scatter plot of Protocol-D (R(2) = 0.1283) at AP showed significant inverse relationship between TLC and BW (P =0.0053), although not significant in Protocols A, B, C. CONCLUSION: In patients with higher BW, protocols of BW-tailored dose of CM and/or fixed injection duration have no dependence on BW to diagnose hypervascular HCCs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-367) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2013-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3742842/ /pubmed/23961429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-367 Text en © Okada et al.; licensee Springer. 2013 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Okada, Masahiro
Kondo, Hiroshi
Sou, Hironobu
Murakami, Takamichi
Kanematsu, Masayuki
Ichikawa, Tomoaki
Yoshikawa, Shushi
Shiosakai, Kazuhito
Hayakawa, Akiko
Awai, Kazuo
Yoshimitsu, Kengo
Yamashita, Yasuyuki
The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
title The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
title_full The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
title_fullStr The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
title_short The efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
title_sort efficacy of contrast protocol in hepatic dynamic computed tomography: multicenter prospective study in community hospitals
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3742842/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23961429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-367
work_keys_str_mv AT okadamasahiro theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT kondohiroshi theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT souhironobu theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT murakamitakamichi theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT kanematsumasayuki theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT ichikawatomoaki theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT yoshikawashushi theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT shiosakaikazuhito theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT hayakawaakiko theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT awaikazuo theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT yoshimitsukengo theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT yamashitayasuyuki theefficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT okadamasahiro efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT kondohiroshi efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT souhironobu efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT murakamitakamichi efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT kanematsumasayuki efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT ichikawatomoaki efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT yoshikawashushi efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT shiosakaikazuhito efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT hayakawaakiko efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT awaikazuo efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT yoshimitsukengo efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals
AT yamashitayasuyuki efficacyofcontrastprotocolinhepaticdynamiccomputedtomographymulticenterprospectivestudyincommunityhospitals