Cargando…
Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting
BACKGROUND: We developed and validated a heart failure (HF) risk score combining daily measurements of multiple device-derived parameters. METHODS: Heart failure patients from clinical studies with implantable devices were used to form two separate data sets. Daily HF scores were estimated by combin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23513212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht083 |
_version_ | 1782280446033264640 |
---|---|
author | Cowie, Martin R. Sarkar, Shantanu Koehler, Jodi Whellan, David J. Crossley, George H. Tang, Wai Hong Wilson Abraham, William T. Sharma, Vinod Santini, Massimo |
author_facet | Cowie, Martin R. Sarkar, Shantanu Koehler, Jodi Whellan, David J. Crossley, George H. Tang, Wai Hong Wilson Abraham, William T. Sharma, Vinod Santini, Massimo |
author_sort | Cowie, Martin R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We developed and validated a heart failure (HF) risk score combining daily measurements of multiple device-derived parameters. METHODS: Heart failure patients from clinical studies with implantable devices were used to form two separate data sets. Daily HF scores were estimated by combining changes in intra-thoracic impedance, atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, rapid rate during AF, %CRT pacing, ventricular tachycardia, night heart rate, heart rate variability, and activity using a Bayesian model. Simulated monthly follow-ups consisted of looking back at the maximum daily HF risk score in the preceding 30 days, categorizing the evaluation as high, medium, or low risk, and evaluating the occurrence of HF hospitalizations in the next 30 days. We used an Anderson–Gill model to compare survival free from HF events in the next 30 days based on risk groups. RESULTS: The development data set consisted of 921 patients with 9790 patient-months of data and 91 months with HF hospitalizations. The validation data set consisted of 1310 patients with 10 655 patient-months of data and 163 months with HF hospitalizations. In the validation data set, 10% of monthly evaluations in 34% of the patients were in the high-risk group. Monthly diagnostic evaluations in the high-risk group were 10 times (adjusted HR: 10.0; 95% CI: 6.4–15.7, P < 0.001) more likely to have an HF hospitalization (event rate of 6.8%) in the next 30 days compared with monthly evaluations in the low-risk group (event rate of 0.6%). CONCLUSION: An HF score based on implantable device diagnostics can identify increased risk for HF hospitalization in the next 30 days. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3743068 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37430682013-08-14 Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting Cowie, Martin R. Sarkar, Shantanu Koehler, Jodi Whellan, David J. Crossley, George H. Tang, Wai Hong Wilson Abraham, William T. Sharma, Vinod Santini, Massimo Eur Heart J Clinical Research BACKGROUND: We developed and validated a heart failure (HF) risk score combining daily measurements of multiple device-derived parameters. METHODS: Heart failure patients from clinical studies with implantable devices were used to form two separate data sets. Daily HF scores were estimated by combining changes in intra-thoracic impedance, atrial fibrillation (AF) burden, rapid rate during AF, %CRT pacing, ventricular tachycardia, night heart rate, heart rate variability, and activity using a Bayesian model. Simulated monthly follow-ups consisted of looking back at the maximum daily HF risk score in the preceding 30 days, categorizing the evaluation as high, medium, or low risk, and evaluating the occurrence of HF hospitalizations in the next 30 days. We used an Anderson–Gill model to compare survival free from HF events in the next 30 days based on risk groups. RESULTS: The development data set consisted of 921 patients with 9790 patient-months of data and 91 months with HF hospitalizations. The validation data set consisted of 1310 patients with 10 655 patient-months of data and 163 months with HF hospitalizations. In the validation data set, 10% of monthly evaluations in 34% of the patients were in the high-risk group. Monthly diagnostic evaluations in the high-risk group were 10 times (adjusted HR: 10.0; 95% CI: 6.4–15.7, P < 0.001) more likely to have an HF hospitalization (event rate of 6.8%) in the next 30 days compared with monthly evaluations in the low-risk group (event rate of 0.6%). CONCLUSION: An HF score based on implantable device diagnostics can identify increased risk for HF hospitalization in the next 30 days. Oxford University Press 2013-08-14 2013-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3743068/ /pubmed/23513212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht083 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal, Learned Society and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Cowie, Martin R. Sarkar, Shantanu Koehler, Jodi Whellan, David J. Crossley, George H. Tang, Wai Hong Wilson Abraham, William T. Sharma, Vinod Santini, Massimo Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
title | Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
title_full | Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
title_short | Development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
title_sort | development and validation of an integrated diagnostic algorithm derived from parameters monitored in implantable devices for identifying patients at risk for heart failure hospitalization in an ambulatory setting |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743068/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23513212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht083 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cowiemartinr developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT sarkarshantanu developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT koehlerjodi developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT whellandavidj developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT crossleygeorgeh developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT tangwaihongwilson developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT abrahamwilliamt developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT sharmavinod developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting AT santinimassimo developmentandvalidationofanintegrateddiagnosticalgorithmderivedfromparametersmonitoredinimplantabledevicesforidentifyingpatientsatriskforheartfailurehospitalizationinanambulatorysetting |