Cargando…
Pro/con clinical debate: High-frequency oscillatory ventilation is better than conventional ventilation for premature infants
Arguably one of the most important advances in critical care medicine in recent years has been the understanding that mechanical ventilators can impart harm and that lung-protective ventilation strategies can save lives. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation appears ideally suited for lung protecti...
Autores principales: | Courtney, Sherry E, Durand, David J, Asselin, Jeanette M, Eichenwald, Eric C, Stark, Ann R |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14624681 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Pro/con clinical debate: Is high-frequency oscillatory ventilation useful in the management of adult patients with respiratory failure?
por: Singh, Jeffrey M, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
High‐frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation: hemodynamic effects on lung and heart
por: Smailys, Andrea, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Pro/con clinical debate: Tracheostomy is ideal for withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in severe neurological impairment
por: Mascia, Luciana, et al.
Publicado: (2004) -
Pro/con clinical debate: The use of a protected specimen brush in the diagnosis of ventilator associated pneumonia
por: Heyland, Daren, et al.
Publicado: (2002) -
Elective High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Versus Conventional Ventilation for Acute Pulmonary Dysfunction in Preterm Infants
por: Al Ethawi, Yahya
Publicado: (2012)