Cargando…

What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?

The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on two recent papers, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical complications in the intensive care unit as compared with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Timsit, Jean-François
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2003
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14624670
_version_ 1782121277555736576
author Timsit, Jean-François
author_facet Timsit, Jean-François
author_sort Timsit, Jean-François
collection PubMed
description The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on two recent papers, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical complications in the intensive care unit as compared with subclavian access, and it is preferable for short-term access (<5–7 days) and for haemodialysis catheters. Subclavian access is associated with a lower risk for infection and is the route of choice, in experienced hands, if the risk for infection is high (central venous catheter placement >5–7 days) or if the risk for mechanical complications is low. The femoral route is associated with a higher risk for infection and thrombosis (as compared with the subclavian route). It should be restricted to patients in whom pneumothorax or haemorrhage would be unacceptable.
format Text
id pubmed-374364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2003
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-3743642004-03-25 What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? Timsit, Jean-François Crit Care Commentary The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on two recent papers, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical complications in the intensive care unit as compared with subclavian access, and it is preferable for short-term access (<5–7 days) and for haemodialysis catheters. Subclavian access is associated with a lower risk for infection and is the route of choice, in experienced hands, if the risk for infection is high (central venous catheter placement >5–7 days) or if the risk for mechanical complications is low. The femoral route is associated with a higher risk for infection and thrombosis (as compared with the subclavian route). It should be restricted to patients in whom pneumothorax or haemorrhage would be unacceptable. BioMed Central 2003 2003-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC374364/ /pubmed/14624670 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd
spellingShingle Commentary
Timsit, Jean-François
What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
title What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
title_full What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
title_fullStr What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
title_full_unstemmed What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
title_short What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
title_sort what is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14624670
work_keys_str_mv AT timsitjeanfrancois whatisthebestsiteforcentralvenouscatheterinsertionincriticallyillpatients