Cargando…
What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients?
The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on two recent papers, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical complications in the intensive care unit as compared with...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2003
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14624670 |
_version_ | 1782121277555736576 |
---|---|
author | Timsit, Jean-François |
author_facet | Timsit, Jean-François |
author_sort | Timsit, Jean-François |
collection | PubMed |
description | The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on two recent papers, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical complications in the intensive care unit as compared with subclavian access, and it is preferable for short-term access (<5–7 days) and for haemodialysis catheters. Subclavian access is associated with a lower risk for infection and is the route of choice, in experienced hands, if the risk for infection is high (central venous catheter placement >5–7 days) or if the risk for mechanical complications is low. The femoral route is associated with a higher risk for infection and thrombosis (as compared with the subclavian route). It should be restricted to patients in whom pneumothorax or haemorrhage would be unacceptable. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-374364 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2003 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-3743642004-03-25 What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? Timsit, Jean-François Crit Care Commentary The choice of the best central venous access for a particular patient is based on the rate and the severity of failures and complications. Based on two recent papers, internal jugular access is associated with a low rate of severe mechanical complications in the intensive care unit as compared with subclavian access, and it is preferable for short-term access (<5–7 days) and for haemodialysis catheters. Subclavian access is associated with a lower risk for infection and is the route of choice, in experienced hands, if the risk for infection is high (central venous catheter placement >5–7 days) or if the risk for mechanical complications is low. The femoral route is associated with a higher risk for infection and thrombosis (as compared with the subclavian route). It should be restricted to patients in whom pneumothorax or haemorrhage would be unacceptable. BioMed Central 2003 2003-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC374364/ /pubmed/14624670 Text en Copyright © 2003 BioMed Central Ltd |
spellingShingle | Commentary Timsit, Jean-François What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
title | What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
title_full | What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
title_fullStr | What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
title_short | What is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
title_sort | what is the best site for central venous catheter insertion in critically ill patients? |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC374364/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14624670 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timsitjeanfrancois whatisthebestsiteforcentralvenouscatheterinsertionincriticallyillpatients |