Cargando…

Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR

BACKGROUND: Mosquito vectors of malaria in Southeast Asia readily feed outdoors making malaria control through indoor insecticides such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying more difficult. Topical insect repellents may be able to protect users from outdoor biting, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen-Hussey, Vanessa, Carneiro, Ilona, Keomanila, Hongkham, Gray, Rob, Bannavong, Sihamano, Phanalasy, Saysana, Lindsay, Steven W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070664
_version_ 1782280525365379072
author Chen-Hussey, Vanessa
Carneiro, Ilona
Keomanila, Hongkham
Gray, Rob
Bannavong, Sihamano
Phanalasy, Saysana
Lindsay, Steven W.
author_facet Chen-Hussey, Vanessa
Carneiro, Ilona
Keomanila, Hongkham
Gray, Rob
Bannavong, Sihamano
Phanalasy, Saysana
Lindsay, Steven W.
author_sort Chen-Hussey, Vanessa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mosquito vectors of malaria in Southeast Asia readily feed outdoors making malaria control through indoor insecticides such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying more difficult. Topical insect repellents may be able to protect users from outdoor biting, thereby providing additional protection above the current best practice of LLINs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A double blind, household randomised, placebo-controlled trial of insect repellent to reduce malaria was carried out in southern Lao PDR to determine whether the use of repellent and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) could reduce malaria more than LLINs alone. A total of 1,597 households, including 7,979 participants, were recruited in June 2009 and April 2010. Equal group allocation, stratified by village, was used to randomise 795 households to a 15% DEET lotion and the remainder were given a placebo lotion. Participants, field staff and data analysts were blinded to the group assignment until data analysis had been completed. All households received new LLINs. Participants were asked to apply their lotion to exposed skin every evening and sleep under the LLINs each night. Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax cases were actively identified by monthly rapid diagnostic tests. Intention to treat analysis found no effect from the use of repellent on malaria incidence (hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p = 0.868). A higher socio-economic score was found to significantly decrease malaria risk (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58–0.90, p = 0.004). Women were also found to have a reduced risk of infection (hazard ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.92, p = 0.020). According to protocol analysis which excluded participants using the lotions less than 90% of the time found similar results with no effect from the use of repellent. CONCLUSIONS: This randomised controlled trial suggests that topical repellents are not a suitable intervention in addition to LLINs against malaria amongst agricultural populations in southern Lao PDR. These results are also likely to be applicable to much of the Greater Mekong Sub-region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with number NCT00938379
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3743820
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37438202013-08-21 Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR Chen-Hussey, Vanessa Carneiro, Ilona Keomanila, Hongkham Gray, Rob Bannavong, Sihamano Phanalasy, Saysana Lindsay, Steven W. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Mosquito vectors of malaria in Southeast Asia readily feed outdoors making malaria control through indoor insecticides such as long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) and indoor residual spraying more difficult. Topical insect repellents may be able to protect users from outdoor biting, thereby providing additional protection above the current best practice of LLINs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A double blind, household randomised, placebo-controlled trial of insect repellent to reduce malaria was carried out in southern Lao PDR to determine whether the use of repellent and long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) could reduce malaria more than LLINs alone. A total of 1,597 households, including 7,979 participants, were recruited in June 2009 and April 2010. Equal group allocation, stratified by village, was used to randomise 795 households to a 15% DEET lotion and the remainder were given a placebo lotion. Participants, field staff and data analysts were blinded to the group assignment until data analysis had been completed. All households received new LLINs. Participants were asked to apply their lotion to exposed skin every evening and sleep under the LLINs each night. Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax cases were actively identified by monthly rapid diagnostic tests. Intention to treat analysis found no effect from the use of repellent on malaria incidence (hazard ratio: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.99–1.01, p = 0.868). A higher socio-economic score was found to significantly decrease malaria risk (hazard ratio: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.58–0.90, p = 0.004). Women were also found to have a reduced risk of infection (hazard ratio: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37–0.92, p = 0.020). According to protocol analysis which excluded participants using the lotions less than 90% of the time found similar results with no effect from the use of repellent. CONCLUSIONS: This randomised controlled trial suggests that topical repellents are not a suitable intervention in addition to LLINs against malaria amongst agricultural populations in southern Lao PDR. These results are also likely to be applicable to much of the Greater Mekong Sub-region. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with number NCT00938379 Public Library of Science 2013-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3743820/ /pubmed/23967083 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070664 Text en © 2013 Chen-Hussey et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen-Hussey, Vanessa
Carneiro, Ilona
Keomanila, Hongkham
Gray, Rob
Bannavong, Sihamano
Phanalasy, Saysana
Lindsay, Steven W.
Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR
title Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR
title_full Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR
title_fullStr Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR
title_full_unstemmed Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR
title_short Can Topical Insect Repellents Reduce Malaria? A Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial of the Insect Repellent N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) in Lao PDR
title_sort can topical insect repellents reduce malaria? a cluster-randomised controlled trial of the insect repellent n,n-diethyl-m-toluamide (deet) in lao pdr
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743820/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967083
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070664
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhusseyvanessa cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr
AT carneiroilona cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr
AT keomanilahongkham cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr
AT grayrob cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr
AT bannavongsihamano cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr
AT phanalasysaysana cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr
AT lindsaystevenw cantopicalinsectrepellentsreducemalariaaclusterrandomisedcontrolledtrialoftheinsectrepellentnndiethylmtoluamidedeetinlaopdr