Cargando…

Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line therapy for COPD. Indacaterol is a novel addition to existing long-acting bronchodilators. OBJECTIVES: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on efficacy and safety of indacaterol as compared: 1) with placebo at different dosage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Vincent C. H., Ma, Polly H. X., Hui, David S. C., Tam, Wilson W. S., Tang, Jin Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070784
_version_ 1782280527857844224
author Chung, Vincent C. H.
Ma, Polly H. X.
Hui, David S. C.
Tam, Wilson W. S.
Tang, Jin Ling
author_facet Chung, Vincent C. H.
Ma, Polly H. X.
Hui, David S. C.
Tam, Wilson W. S.
Tang, Jin Ling
author_sort Chung, Vincent C. H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line therapy for COPD. Indacaterol is a novel addition to existing long-acting bronchodilators. OBJECTIVES: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on efficacy and safety of indacaterol as compared: 1) with placebo at different dosages, 2) with existing bronchodilators; (3) as add-on treatment to tiotropium. METHODS: We searched 13 electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, and contacted the manufacturer for unpublished data. Primary outcome was mean FEV1 change at 12(th) week, secondary outcomes included changes in SGRQ, TDI and BODE index at 6 months, exacerbation at 1 year, and worsening of symptoms. RESULTS: Twelve eligible RCTs of moderate risk of bias included data from 10,977 patients. Compared to placebo, indacaterol improved FEV1 by a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.16 L (95%CI: 0.15, 0.18 L, p<0.001), homogeneously above the minimally important difference of 0.10 L. It offered clinically relevant improvement in all secondary outcomes except exacerbation. Magnitude of benefit did not differ significantly by dosage, but one treatment related death was reported at 300 ug. Efficacy of Indacaterol was similar to formoterol and salmeterol (FEV1 WMD = 0.04L, 95%CI: 0.01L, 0.07 L, p = 0.02); and tiotropium (FEV1 WMD = 0.01L, 95%CI: −0.01, 0.03L, p = 0.61). The use of indacaterol on top of tiotropium yielded additional improvement on FEV1 (WMD = 0.07 L, 95%CI: 0.05L, 0.10 L, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Indacaterol is safe and beneficial for patients with COPD at dosage ≤150 ug. It may serve as a good alternative to existing bronchodilators, or as an add-on to tiotropium for unresponsive patients. Use of higher dosage requires further justification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3743831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37438312013-08-21 Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chung, Vincent C. H. Ma, Polly H. X. Hui, David S. C. Tam, Wilson W. S. Tang, Jin Ling PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Inhaled bronchodilators are the first-line therapy for COPD. Indacaterol is a novel addition to existing long-acting bronchodilators. OBJECTIVES: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on efficacy and safety of indacaterol as compared: 1) with placebo at different dosages, 2) with existing bronchodilators; (3) as add-on treatment to tiotropium. METHODS: We searched 13 electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL, and contacted the manufacturer for unpublished data. Primary outcome was mean FEV1 change at 12(th) week, secondary outcomes included changes in SGRQ, TDI and BODE index at 6 months, exacerbation at 1 year, and worsening of symptoms. RESULTS: Twelve eligible RCTs of moderate risk of bias included data from 10,977 patients. Compared to placebo, indacaterol improved FEV1 by a weighted mean difference (WMD) of 0.16 L (95%CI: 0.15, 0.18 L, p<0.001), homogeneously above the minimally important difference of 0.10 L. It offered clinically relevant improvement in all secondary outcomes except exacerbation. Magnitude of benefit did not differ significantly by dosage, but one treatment related death was reported at 300 ug. Efficacy of Indacaterol was similar to formoterol and salmeterol (FEV1 WMD = 0.04L, 95%CI: 0.01L, 0.07 L, p = 0.02); and tiotropium (FEV1 WMD = 0.01L, 95%CI: −0.01, 0.03L, p = 0.61). The use of indacaterol on top of tiotropium yielded additional improvement on FEV1 (WMD = 0.07 L, 95%CI: 0.05L, 0.10 L, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Indacaterol is safe and beneficial for patients with COPD at dosage ≤150 ug. It may serve as a good alternative to existing bronchodilators, or as an add-on to tiotropium for unresponsive patients. Use of higher dosage requires further justification. Public Library of Science 2013-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3743831/ /pubmed/23967106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070784 Text en © 2013 Chung et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chung, Vincent C. H.
Ma, Polly H. X.
Hui, David S. C.
Tam, Wilson W. S.
Tang, Jin Ling
Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Indacaterol for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort indacaterol for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3743831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0070784
work_keys_str_mv AT chungvincentch indacaterolforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mapollyhx indacaterolforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huidavidsc indacaterolforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tamwilsonws indacaterolforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tangjinling indacaterolforchronicobstructivepulmonarydiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis