Cargando…

In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge

BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) – rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, David, Koornstra, Wim, Fagrouch, Zahra, Verschoor, Ernst J., Heeney, Jonathan L., Bogers, Willy M. J. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072702
_version_ 1782280702379687936
author Davis, David
Koornstra, Wim
Fagrouch, Zahra
Verschoor, Ernst J.
Heeney, Jonathan L.
Bogers, Willy M. J. M.
author_facet Davis, David
Koornstra, Wim
Fagrouch, Zahra
Verschoor, Ernst J.
Heeney, Jonathan L.
Bogers, Willy M. J. M.
author_sort Davis, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) – rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is that neutralizing antibodies can only completely inactivate a relatively small number of infectious virus. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We have used GHOST cell assays to quantify individual infectious events with HIV-1(SF162) and its SHIV derivatives: the relatively neutralization sensitive SHIV(SF162P4) isolate and the more resistant SHIV(SF162P3). A plot of the number of fluorescent GHOST cells with increasing HIV-1(SF162) dose is not linear. It is likely that with high-dose inocula, infection with multiple virus produces additive fluorescence in individual cells. In studies of the neutralization kinetics of IgG1 b12 against these isolates, events during the absorption phase of the assay, as well as the incubation phase, determine the level of neutralization. It is possible that complete inactivation of a virus is limited to the time it is exposed on the cell surface. Assays can be modified so that neutralization of these very low doses of virus can be quantified. A higher concentration of antibody is required to neutralize the same dose of resistant SHIV(SF162P3) than the sensitive SHIV(SF162P4). In the absence of selection during passage, the density of the CCR5 co-receptor on the GHOST cell surface is reduced. Changes in the CD4 : CCR5 density ratio influence neutralization. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of IgG1 b12 completely inactivate small doses of the neutralization resistant SHIV (SF162P3). Assays need to be modified to quantify this effect. Results from modified assays may predict protection following repeated low-dose shiv challenges in rhesus macaques. It should be possible to induce this level of antibody by vaccination so that modified assays could predict the outcome of human trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3745472
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37454722013-08-23 In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge Davis, David Koornstra, Wim Fagrouch, Zahra Verschoor, Ernst J. Heeney, Jonathan L. Bogers, Willy M. J. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) – rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is that neutralizing antibodies can only completely inactivate a relatively small number of infectious virus. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We have used GHOST cell assays to quantify individual infectious events with HIV-1(SF162) and its SHIV derivatives: the relatively neutralization sensitive SHIV(SF162P4) isolate and the more resistant SHIV(SF162P3). A plot of the number of fluorescent GHOST cells with increasing HIV-1(SF162) dose is not linear. It is likely that with high-dose inocula, infection with multiple virus produces additive fluorescence in individual cells. In studies of the neutralization kinetics of IgG1 b12 against these isolates, events during the absorption phase of the assay, as well as the incubation phase, determine the level of neutralization. It is possible that complete inactivation of a virus is limited to the time it is exposed on the cell surface. Assays can be modified so that neutralization of these very low doses of virus can be quantified. A higher concentration of antibody is required to neutralize the same dose of resistant SHIV(SF162P3) than the sensitive SHIV(SF162P4). In the absence of selection during passage, the density of the CCR5 co-receptor on the GHOST cell surface is reduced. Changes in the CD4 : CCR5 density ratio influence neutralization. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of IgG1 b12 completely inactivate small doses of the neutralization resistant SHIV (SF162P3). Assays need to be modified to quantify this effect. Results from modified assays may predict protection following repeated low-dose shiv challenges in rhesus macaques. It should be possible to induce this level of antibody by vaccination so that modified assays could predict the outcome of human trials. Public Library of Science 2013-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3745472/ /pubmed/23977339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072702 Text en © 2013 Davis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Davis, David
Koornstra, Wim
Fagrouch, Zahra
Verschoor, Ernst J.
Heeney, Jonathan L.
Bogers, Willy M. J. M.
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
title In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
title_full In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
title_fullStr In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
title_full_unstemmed In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
title_short In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
title_sort in vitro neutralization of low dose inocula at physiological concentrations of a monoclonal antibody which protects macaques against shiv challenge
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745472/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072702
work_keys_str_mv AT davisdavid invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge
AT koornstrawim invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge
AT fagrouchzahra invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge
AT verschoorernstj invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge
AT heeneyjonathanl invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge
AT bogerswillymjm invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge