Cargando…
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge
BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) – rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072702 |
_version_ | 1782280702379687936 |
---|---|
author | Davis, David Koornstra, Wim Fagrouch, Zahra Verschoor, Ernst J. Heeney, Jonathan L. Bogers, Willy M. J. M. |
author_facet | Davis, David Koornstra, Wim Fagrouch, Zahra Verschoor, Ernst J. Heeney, Jonathan L. Bogers, Willy M. J. M. |
author_sort | Davis, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) – rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is that neutralizing antibodies can only completely inactivate a relatively small number of infectious virus. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We have used GHOST cell assays to quantify individual infectious events with HIV-1(SF162) and its SHIV derivatives: the relatively neutralization sensitive SHIV(SF162P4) isolate and the more resistant SHIV(SF162P3). A plot of the number of fluorescent GHOST cells with increasing HIV-1(SF162) dose is not linear. It is likely that with high-dose inocula, infection with multiple virus produces additive fluorescence in individual cells. In studies of the neutralization kinetics of IgG1 b12 against these isolates, events during the absorption phase of the assay, as well as the incubation phase, determine the level of neutralization. It is possible that complete inactivation of a virus is limited to the time it is exposed on the cell surface. Assays can be modified so that neutralization of these very low doses of virus can be quantified. A higher concentration of antibody is required to neutralize the same dose of resistant SHIV(SF162P3) than the sensitive SHIV(SF162P4). In the absence of selection during passage, the density of the CCR5 co-receptor on the GHOST cell surface is reduced. Changes in the CD4 : CCR5 density ratio influence neutralization. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of IgG1 b12 completely inactivate small doses of the neutralization resistant SHIV (SF162P3). Assays need to be modified to quantify this effect. Results from modified assays may predict protection following repeated low-dose shiv challenges in rhesus macaques. It should be possible to induce this level of antibody by vaccination so that modified assays could predict the outcome of human trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3745472 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37454722013-08-23 In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge Davis, David Koornstra, Wim Fagrouch, Zahra Verschoor, Ernst J. Heeney, Jonathan L. Bogers, Willy M. J. M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Passive transfer of antibodies can be protective in the simian human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) – rhesus macaque challenge model. The human monoclonal antibody IgG1 b12 neutralizes human immunodeficiency type 1 (HIV-1) in vitro and protects against challenge by SHIV. Our hypothesis is that neutralizing antibodies can only completely inactivate a relatively small number of infectious virus. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We have used GHOST cell assays to quantify individual infectious events with HIV-1(SF162) and its SHIV derivatives: the relatively neutralization sensitive SHIV(SF162P4) isolate and the more resistant SHIV(SF162P3). A plot of the number of fluorescent GHOST cells with increasing HIV-1(SF162) dose is not linear. It is likely that with high-dose inocula, infection with multiple virus produces additive fluorescence in individual cells. In studies of the neutralization kinetics of IgG1 b12 against these isolates, events during the absorption phase of the assay, as well as the incubation phase, determine the level of neutralization. It is possible that complete inactivation of a virus is limited to the time it is exposed on the cell surface. Assays can be modified so that neutralization of these very low doses of virus can be quantified. A higher concentration of antibody is required to neutralize the same dose of resistant SHIV(SF162P3) than the sensitive SHIV(SF162P4). In the absence of selection during passage, the density of the CCR5 co-receptor on the GHOST cell surface is reduced. Changes in the CD4 : CCR5 density ratio influence neutralization. CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of IgG1 b12 completely inactivate small doses of the neutralization resistant SHIV (SF162P3). Assays need to be modified to quantify this effect. Results from modified assays may predict protection following repeated low-dose shiv challenges in rhesus macaques. It should be possible to induce this level of antibody by vaccination so that modified assays could predict the outcome of human trials. Public Library of Science 2013-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3745472/ /pubmed/23977339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072702 Text en © 2013 Davis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Davis, David Koornstra, Wim Fagrouch, Zahra Verschoor, Ernst J. Heeney, Jonathan L. Bogers, Willy M. J. M. In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge |
title |
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge |
title_full |
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge |
title_fullStr |
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge |
title_short |
In Vitro Neutralization of Low Dose Inocula at Physiological Concentrations of a Monoclonal Antibody Which Protects Macaques against SHIV Challenge |
title_sort | in vitro neutralization of low dose inocula at physiological concentrations of a monoclonal antibody which protects macaques against shiv challenge |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3745472/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072702 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davisdavid invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge AT koornstrawim invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge AT fagrouchzahra invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge AT verschoorernstj invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge AT heeneyjonathanl invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge AT bogerswillymjm invitroneutralizationoflowdoseinoculaatphysiologicalconcentrationsofamonoclonalantibodywhichprotectsmacaquesagainstshivchallenge |