Cargando…

What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?

Radionuclide therapy for cancer is undergoing a renaissance, with a wide range of radionuclide and clinical delivery systems currently under investigation. Dosimetry at the cellular and sub-cellular level is complex with inhomogeneity and incomplete targeting of all cells such that some tumor cells...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brady, Darren, O’Sullivan, Joe M., Prise, Kevin M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3746502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967404
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00215
_version_ 1782280834840002560
author Brady, Darren
O’Sullivan, Joe M.
Prise, Kevin M.
author_facet Brady, Darren
O’Sullivan, Joe M.
Prise, Kevin M.
author_sort Brady, Darren
collection PubMed
description Radionuclide therapy for cancer is undergoing a renaissance, with a wide range of radionuclide and clinical delivery systems currently under investigation. Dosimetry at the cellular and sub-cellular level is complex with inhomogeneity and incomplete targeting of all cells such that some tumor cells will receive little or no direct radiation energy. There is now sufficient preclinical evidence of a Bystander response which can modulate the biology of these un-irradiated cells with current research demonstrating both protective and inhibitory responses. Dependence upon fraction of irradiated cells has also been found and the presence of functional gap junctions appears to be import for several Bystander responses. The selection of either high or low LET radionuclides may be critical. While low LET radionuclides appear to have a Bystander response proportional to dose, the dose-response from high LET radionuclides are more complex. In media transfer experiments a “U” shaped response curve has been demonstrated for high LET treatments. However this “U” shaped response has not been seen with co-culture experiments and its relevance remains uncertain. For high LET treatments there is a suggestion that dose rate effects may also be important with inhibitory effects noted with 125I labelling study and a stimulatory seen with 123I labelling in one study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3746502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37465022013-08-21 What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies? Brady, Darren O’Sullivan, Joe M. Prise, Kevin M. Front Oncol Oncology Radionuclide therapy for cancer is undergoing a renaissance, with a wide range of radionuclide and clinical delivery systems currently under investigation. Dosimetry at the cellular and sub-cellular level is complex with inhomogeneity and incomplete targeting of all cells such that some tumor cells will receive little or no direct radiation energy. There is now sufficient preclinical evidence of a Bystander response which can modulate the biology of these un-irradiated cells with current research demonstrating both protective and inhibitory responses. Dependence upon fraction of irradiated cells has also been found and the presence of functional gap junctions appears to be import for several Bystander responses. The selection of either high or low LET radionuclides may be critical. While low LET radionuclides appear to have a Bystander response proportional to dose, the dose-response from high LET radionuclides are more complex. In media transfer experiments a “U” shaped response curve has been demonstrated for high LET treatments. However this “U” shaped response has not been seen with co-culture experiments and its relevance remains uncertain. For high LET treatments there is a suggestion that dose rate effects may also be important with inhibitory effects noted with 125I labelling study and a stimulatory seen with 123I labelling in one study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3746502/ /pubmed/23967404 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00215 Text en Copyright © 2013 Brady, O’Sullivan and Prise. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Brady, Darren
O’Sullivan, Joe M.
Prise, Kevin M.
What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?
title What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?
title_full What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?
title_fullStr What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?
title_full_unstemmed What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?
title_short What is the Role of the Bystander Response in Radionuclide Therapies?
title_sort what is the role of the bystander response in radionuclide therapies?
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3746502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23967404
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2013.00215
work_keys_str_mv AT bradydarren whatistheroleofthebystanderresponseinradionuclidetherapies
AT osullivanjoem whatistheroleofthebystanderresponseinradionuclidetherapies
AT prisekevinm whatistheroleofthebystanderresponseinradionuclidetherapies