Cargando…

The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets

Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of no-primer adhesives tested with two different bracket bases. Materials and Methods. 120 bovine permanent mandibular incisors were divided into 6 groups of 20 specimens. Two bracke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Scribante, Andrea, Sfondrini, Maria Francesca, Fraticelli, Danilo, Daina, Paola, Tamagnone, Alessandra, Gandini, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/315023
_version_ 1782280914712133632
author Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Fraticelli, Danilo
Daina, Paola
Tamagnone, Alessandra
Gandini, Paola
author_facet Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Fraticelli, Danilo
Daina, Paola
Tamagnone, Alessandra
Gandini, Paola
author_sort Scribante, Andrea
collection PubMed
description Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of no-primer adhesives tested with two different bracket bases. Materials and Methods. 120 bovine permanent mandibular incisors were divided into 6 groups of 20 specimens. Two brackets (ODP) with different bracket bases (anchor pylons and 80-gauge mesh) were bonded to the teeth using a conventional adhesive (Transbond XT) and two different no-primer adhesive (Ortho Cem; Heliosit) systems. Groups were tested using an instron universal testing machine. SBS values were recorded. ARI scores were measured. SEM microphotographs were taken to evaluate the pattern of bracket bases. Statistical analysis was performed. ANOVA and Tukey tests were carried out for SBS values, whereas a chi-squared test was applied for ARI scores. Results. Highest bond strength values were reported with Transbond XT (with both pad designs), Ortho Cem bonded on anchor pylons and Heliosit on 80-gauge mesh. A higher frequency of ARI score of “3” was reported for Transbond XT groups. Other groups showed a higher frequency of ARI score “2” and “1.” Conclusion. Transbond XT showed the highest shear bond strength values with both pad designs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3747346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37473462013-08-27 The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Scribante, Andrea Sfondrini, Maria Francesca Fraticelli, Danilo Daina, Paola Tamagnone, Alessandra Gandini, Paola Biomed Res Int Research Article Objective. The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) scores of no-primer adhesives tested with two different bracket bases. Materials and Methods. 120 bovine permanent mandibular incisors were divided into 6 groups of 20 specimens. Two brackets (ODP) with different bracket bases (anchor pylons and 80-gauge mesh) were bonded to the teeth using a conventional adhesive (Transbond XT) and two different no-primer adhesive (Ortho Cem; Heliosit) systems. Groups were tested using an instron universal testing machine. SBS values were recorded. ARI scores were measured. SEM microphotographs were taken to evaluate the pattern of bracket bases. Statistical analysis was performed. ANOVA and Tukey tests were carried out for SBS values, whereas a chi-squared test was applied for ARI scores. Results. Highest bond strength values were reported with Transbond XT (with both pad designs), Ortho Cem bonded on anchor pylons and Heliosit on 80-gauge mesh. A higher frequency of ARI score of “3” was reported for Transbond XT groups. Other groups showed a higher frequency of ARI score “2” and “1.” Conclusion. Transbond XT showed the highest shear bond strength values with both pad designs. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-08-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3747346/ /pubmed/23984339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/315023 Text en Copyright © 2013 Andrea Scribante et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Scribante, Andrea
Sfondrini, Maria Francesca
Fraticelli, Danilo
Daina, Paola
Tamagnone, Alessandra
Gandini, Paola
The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_full The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_fullStr The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_short The Influence of No-Primer Adhesives and Anchor Pylons Bracket Bases on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets
title_sort influence of no-primer adhesives and anchor pylons bracket bases on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984339
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/315023
work_keys_str_mv AT scribanteandrea theinfluenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT sfondrinimariafrancesca theinfluenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT fraticellidanilo theinfluenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT dainapaola theinfluenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT tamagnonealessandra theinfluenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT gandinipaola theinfluenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT scribanteandrea influenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT sfondrinimariafrancesca influenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT fraticellidanilo influenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT dainapaola influenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT tamagnonealessandra influenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets
AT gandinipaola influenceofnoprimeradhesivesandanchorpylonsbracketbasesonshearbondstrengthoforthodonticbrackets