Cargando…

Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, compared with sitagliptin in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin plus sulfonylurea. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind, ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schernthaner, Guntram, Gross, Jorge L., Rosenstock, Julio, Guarisco, Michael, Fu, Min, Yee, Jacqueline, Kawaguchi, Masato, Canovatchel, William, Meininger, Gary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23564919
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2491
_version_ 1782281005017595904
author Schernthaner, Guntram
Gross, Jorge L.
Rosenstock, Julio
Guarisco, Michael
Fu, Min
Yee, Jacqueline
Kawaguchi, Masato
Canovatchel, William
Meininger, Gary
author_facet Schernthaner, Guntram
Gross, Jorge L.
Rosenstock, Julio
Guarisco, Michael
Fu, Min
Yee, Jacqueline
Kawaguchi, Masato
Canovatchel, William
Meininger, Gary
author_sort Schernthaner, Guntram
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, compared with sitagliptin in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin plus sulfonylurea. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study, subjects using stable metformin plus sulfonylurea (N = 755) received canagliflozin 300 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg daily. Primary end point was change from baseline in A1C at 52 weeks. Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and systolic blood pressure (BP), and percent change in body weight, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) reports. RESULTS: At 52 weeks, canagliflozin 300 mg demonstrated noninferiority and, in a subsequent assessment, showed superiority to sitagliptin 100 mg in reducing A1C (−1.03% [−11.3 mmol/mol] and −0.66% [−7.2 mmol/mol], respectively; least squares mean difference between groups, −0.37% [95% CI, −0.50 to −0.25] or −4.0 mmol/mol [−5.5 to −2.7]). Greater reductions in FPG, body weight, and systolic BP were observed with canagliflozin versus sitagliptin (P < 0.001). Overall AE rates were similar with canagliflozin (76.7%) and sitagliptin (77.5%); incidence of serious AEs and AE-related discontinuations was low for both groups. Higher incidences of genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis–related AEs were observed with canagliflozin, which led to one discontinuation. Hypoglycemia rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that canagliflozin may be a new therapeutic tool providing better improvement in glycemic control and body weight reduction than sitagliptin, but with increased genital infections in subjects with type 2 diabetes using metformin plus sulfonylurea.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3747923
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37479232014-09-01 Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial Schernthaner, Guntram Gross, Jorge L. Rosenstock, Julio Guarisco, Michael Fu, Min Yee, Jacqueline Kawaguchi, Masato Canovatchel, William Meininger, Gary Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, compared with sitagliptin in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin plus sulfonylurea. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 52-week, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study, subjects using stable metformin plus sulfonylurea (N = 755) received canagliflozin 300 mg or sitagliptin 100 mg daily. Primary end point was change from baseline in A1C at 52 weeks. Secondary end points included change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and systolic blood pressure (BP), and percent change in body weight, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol. Safety was assessed based on adverse event (AE) reports. RESULTS: At 52 weeks, canagliflozin 300 mg demonstrated noninferiority and, in a subsequent assessment, showed superiority to sitagliptin 100 mg in reducing A1C (−1.03% [−11.3 mmol/mol] and −0.66% [−7.2 mmol/mol], respectively; least squares mean difference between groups, −0.37% [95% CI, −0.50 to −0.25] or −4.0 mmol/mol [−5.5 to −2.7]). Greater reductions in FPG, body weight, and systolic BP were observed with canagliflozin versus sitagliptin (P < 0.001). Overall AE rates were similar with canagliflozin (76.7%) and sitagliptin (77.5%); incidence of serious AEs and AE-related discontinuations was low for both groups. Higher incidences of genital mycotic infections and osmotic diuresis–related AEs were observed with canagliflozin, which led to one discontinuation. Hypoglycemia rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that canagliflozin may be a new therapeutic tool providing better improvement in glycemic control and body weight reduction than sitagliptin, but with increased genital infections in subjects with type 2 diabetes using metformin plus sulfonylurea. American Diabetes Association 2013-09 2013-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3747923/ /pubmed/23564919 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2491 Text en © 2013 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Schernthaner, Guntram
Gross, Jorge L.
Rosenstock, Julio
Guarisco, Michael
Fu, Min
Yee, Jacqueline
Kawaguchi, Masato
Canovatchel, William
Meininger, Gary
Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial
title Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial
title_full Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial
title_fullStr Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial
title_short Canagliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Who Do Not Have Adequate Glycemic Control With Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea: A 52-week randomized trial
title_sort canagliflozin compared with sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who do not have adequate glycemic control with metformin plus sulfonylurea: a 52-week randomized trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3747923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23564919
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2491
work_keys_str_mv AT schernthanerguntram canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT grossjorgel canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT rosenstockjulio canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT guariscomichael canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT fumin canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT yeejacqueline canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT kawaguchimasato canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT canovatchelwilliam canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial
AT meiningergary canagliflozincomparedwithsitagliptinforpatientswithtype2diabeteswhodonothaveadequateglycemiccontrolwithmetforminplussulfonylureaa52weekrandomizedtrial