Cargando…

Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether mast cell stabilization by either ketotifen or tranilast could alter either sympathetic or nitrergic innervation function in rat mesenteric arteries. METHODS: Electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contraction was analyzed in mesenteric segments from 6-month-old W...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sastre, Esther, Caracuel, Laura, Xavier, Fabiano E., Balfagón, Gloria, Blanco-Rivero, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232
_version_ 1782281043356680192
author Sastre, Esther
Caracuel, Laura
Xavier, Fabiano E.
Balfagón, Gloria
Blanco-Rivero, Javier
author_facet Sastre, Esther
Caracuel, Laura
Xavier, Fabiano E.
Balfagón, Gloria
Blanco-Rivero, Javier
author_sort Sastre, Esther
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether mast cell stabilization by either ketotifen or tranilast could alter either sympathetic or nitrergic innervation function in rat mesenteric arteries. METHODS: Electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contraction was analyzed in mesenteric segments from 6-month-old Wistar rats in three experimental groups: control, 3-hour ketotifen incubated (0.1 αmol/L), and 3-hour tranilast incubated (0.1 mmol/L). To assess the possible participation of nitrergic or sympathetic innervation, EFS contraction was analyzed in the presence of non-selective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME (0.1 mmol/L), α-adrenergic receptor antagonist phentolamine (0.1 µmol/L), or the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, 1.46 mmol/L). Nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide anion (O(2) (.-)) levels were measured, as were vasomotor responses to noradrenaline (NA) and to NO donor DEA-NO, in the presence and absence of 0.1 mmol/L tempol. Phosphorylated neuronal NOS (P-nNOS) expression was also analyzed. RESULTS: EFS-induced contraction was increased by ketotifen and decreased by tranilast. L-NAME increased the vasoconstrictor response to EFS only in control segments. The vasodilator response to DEA-NO was higher in ketotifen- and tranilast-incubated segments, while tempol increased vasodilator response to DEA-NO only in control segments. Both NO and O(2) (-) release, and P-nNOS expression were diminished by ketotifen and by tranilast treatment. The decrease in EFS-induced contraction produced by phentolamine was lower in tranilast-incubated segments. NA vasomotor response was decreased only by tranilast. The remnant vasoconstriction observed in control and ketotifen-incubated segments was abolished by 6-OHDA. CONCLUSION: While both ketotifen and tranilast diminish nitrergic innervation function, only tranilast diminishes sympathetic innnervation function, thus they alter the vasoconstrictor response to EFS in opposing manners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3748149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37481492013-08-23 Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery Sastre, Esther Caracuel, Laura Xavier, Fabiano E. Balfagón, Gloria Blanco-Rivero, Javier PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: We analyzed whether mast cell stabilization by either ketotifen or tranilast could alter either sympathetic or nitrergic innervation function in rat mesenteric arteries. METHODS: Electrical field stimulation (EFS)-induced contraction was analyzed in mesenteric segments from 6-month-old Wistar rats in three experimental groups: control, 3-hour ketotifen incubated (0.1 αmol/L), and 3-hour tranilast incubated (0.1 mmol/L). To assess the possible participation of nitrergic or sympathetic innervation, EFS contraction was analyzed in the presence of non-selective nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor L-NAME (0.1 mmol/L), α-adrenergic receptor antagonist phentolamine (0.1 µmol/L), or the neurotoxin 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA, 1.46 mmol/L). Nitric oxide (NO) and superoxide anion (O(2) (.-)) levels were measured, as were vasomotor responses to noradrenaline (NA) and to NO donor DEA-NO, in the presence and absence of 0.1 mmol/L tempol. Phosphorylated neuronal NOS (P-nNOS) expression was also analyzed. RESULTS: EFS-induced contraction was increased by ketotifen and decreased by tranilast. L-NAME increased the vasoconstrictor response to EFS only in control segments. The vasodilator response to DEA-NO was higher in ketotifen- and tranilast-incubated segments, while tempol increased vasodilator response to DEA-NO only in control segments. Both NO and O(2) (-) release, and P-nNOS expression were diminished by ketotifen and by tranilast treatment. The decrease in EFS-induced contraction produced by phentolamine was lower in tranilast-incubated segments. NA vasomotor response was decreased only by tranilast. The remnant vasoconstriction observed in control and ketotifen-incubated segments was abolished by 6-OHDA. CONCLUSION: While both ketotifen and tranilast diminish nitrergic innervation function, only tranilast diminishes sympathetic innnervation function, thus they alter the vasoconstrictor response to EFS in opposing manners. Public Library of Science 2013-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3748149/ /pubmed/23977380 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232 Text en © 2013 Sastre et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sastre, Esther
Caracuel, Laura
Xavier, Fabiano E.
Balfagón, Gloria
Blanco-Rivero, Javier
Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery
title Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery
title_full Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery
title_fullStr Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery
title_full_unstemmed Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery
title_short Opposite Effect of Mast Cell Stabilizers Ketotifen and Tranilast on the Vasoconstrictor Response to Electrical Field Stimulation in Rat Mesenteric Artery
title_sort opposite effect of mast cell stabilizers ketotifen and tranilast on the vasoconstrictor response to electrical field stimulation in rat mesenteric artery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23977380
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073232
work_keys_str_mv AT sastreesther oppositeeffectofmastcellstabilizersketotifenandtranilastonthevasoconstrictorresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinratmesentericartery
AT caracuellaura oppositeeffectofmastcellstabilizersketotifenandtranilastonthevasoconstrictorresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinratmesentericartery
AT xavierfabianoe oppositeeffectofmastcellstabilizersketotifenandtranilastonthevasoconstrictorresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinratmesentericartery
AT balfagongloria oppositeeffectofmastcellstabilizersketotifenandtranilastonthevasoconstrictorresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinratmesentericartery
AT blancoriverojavier oppositeeffectofmastcellstabilizersketotifenandtranilastonthevasoconstrictorresponsetoelectricalfieldstimulationinratmesentericartery