Cargando…
In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology
This commentary considers one of the articles published in the first volume of this journal and reflects on the status of research and knowledge at that time. The chiropractic profession has witnessed advancement in the use of the scientific method in the past several decades, and scholarly journals...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
National University of Health Sciences
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echu.2012.10.001 |
_version_ | 1782281054079418368 |
---|---|
author | Winterstein, James |
author_facet | Winterstein, James |
author_sort | Winterstein, James |
collection | PubMed |
description | This commentary considers one of the articles published in the first volume of this journal and reflects on the status of research and knowledge at that time. The chiropractic profession has witnessed advancement in the use of the scientific method in the past several decades, and scholarly journals have helped support this substantial growth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3748333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | National University of Health Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37483332013-08-21 In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology Winterstein, James J Chiropr Humanit Commentary This commentary considers one of the articles published in the first volume of this journal and reflects on the status of research and knowledge at that time. The chiropractic profession has witnessed advancement in the use of the scientific method in the past several decades, and scholarly journals have helped support this substantial growth. National University of Health Sciences 2012-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3748333/ /pubmed/23966889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echu.2012.10.001 Text en © 2012 National University of Health Sciences. All rights reserved. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Winterstein, James In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology |
title | In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology |
title_full | In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology |
title_fullStr | In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology |
title_full_unstemmed | In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology |
title_short | In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology |
title_sort | in response to “the knowledge of our knowledge”: a reflection on mcandrews’ view of epistemology |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.echu.2012.10.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wintersteinjames inresponsetotheknowledgeofourknowledgeareflectiononmcandrewsviewofepistemology |