Cargando…
Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities
BACKGROUND: Renal fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has become an uncommon procedure in the era of renal helical computed tomography (CT), which has high diagnostic accuracy in the characterization of renal cortical lesions. This study investigates the current indications for renal FNAB. Having k...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23976896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.115093 |
_version_ | 1782281105832935424 |
---|---|
author | Dragoescu, Ema A Liu, Lina |
author_facet | Dragoescu, Ema A Liu, Lina |
author_sort | Dragoescu, Ema A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Renal fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has become an uncommon procedure in the era of renal helical computed tomography (CT), which has high diagnostic accuracy in the characterization of renal cortical lesions. This study investigates the current indications for renal FNAB. Having knowledge of the specific clinico-radiologic scenario that led to the FNAB, cytopathologists are better equipped to expand or narrow down their differential diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All renal FNABs performed during a 6 year interval were retrieved. Indication for the procedure was determined from the clinical notes and radiology reports. RESULTS: Forty six renal FNABs were retrieved from 43 patients (14 females and 29 males with a mean age of 52 years [range, 4-81 years]). Twenty one cases (45.6%) were performed under CT-guidance and 25 cases (54.4%) under US-guidance. There were four distinct indications for renal FNAB: (1) solid renal masses with atypical radiological features or poorly characterized on imaging studies due to lack of intravenous contrast or body habitus (30.2%); (2) confirmation of radiologically suspected renal cell carcinoma in inoperable patients (advanced stage disease or poor surgical candidate status) (27.9%); (3) kidney mass in a patient with a prior history of other malignancy (27.9%); and (4) miscellaneous (drainage of abscess, indeterminate cystic lesion, urothelial carcinoma) (14.0%). 36 patients (83.7%) received a specific diagnosis based on renal FNAB cytology. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, renal fine needle aspiration remains a useful diagnostic tool in selected clinico-radiologic scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3748672 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37486722013-08-23 Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities Dragoescu, Ema A Liu, Lina Cytojournal Research Article BACKGROUND: Renal fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) has become an uncommon procedure in the era of renal helical computed tomography (CT), which has high diagnostic accuracy in the characterization of renal cortical lesions. This study investigates the current indications for renal FNAB. Having knowledge of the specific clinico-radiologic scenario that led to the FNAB, cytopathologists are better equipped to expand or narrow down their differential diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All renal FNABs performed during a 6 year interval were retrieved. Indication for the procedure was determined from the clinical notes and radiology reports. RESULTS: Forty six renal FNABs were retrieved from 43 patients (14 females and 29 males with a mean age of 52 years [range, 4-81 years]). Twenty one cases (45.6%) were performed under CT-guidance and 25 cases (54.4%) under US-guidance. There were four distinct indications for renal FNAB: (1) solid renal masses with atypical radiological features or poorly characterized on imaging studies due to lack of intravenous contrast or body habitus (30.2%); (2) confirmation of radiologically suspected renal cell carcinoma in inoperable patients (advanced stage disease or poor surgical candidate status) (27.9%); (3) kidney mass in a patient with a prior history of other malignancy (27.9%); and (4) miscellaneous (drainage of abscess, indeterminate cystic lesion, urothelial carcinoma) (14.0%). 36 patients (83.7%) received a specific diagnosis based on renal FNAB cytology. CONCLUSIONS: Currently, renal fine needle aspiration remains a useful diagnostic tool in selected clinico-radiologic scenarios. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-07-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3748672/ /pubmed/23976896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.115093 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Dragoescu, et al.; licensee Cytopathology Foundation Inc http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dragoescu, Ema A Liu, Lina Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
title | Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
title_full | Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
title_fullStr | Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
title_full_unstemmed | Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
title_short | Indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
title_sort | indications for renal fine needle aspiration biopsy in the era of modern imaging modalities |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748672/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23976896 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1742-6413.115093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dragoescuemaa indicationsforrenalfineneedleaspirationbiopsyintheeraofmodernimagingmodalities AT liulina indicationsforrenalfineneedleaspirationbiopsyintheeraofmodernimagingmodalities |