Cargando…

Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope

BACKGROUND: The Truview EVO2(C) laryngoscope (TL) is a recently introduced optical device designed to provide an unmagnified anterior image of the glottic opening and allow indirect laryngoscopy. AIM: This study is designed to determine whether the TL is a better alternative to the Macintosh laryngo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saxena, Arpita, Madan, Manish, Shrivastava, Uma, Mittal, Apurva, Dwivedi, Yogita, Agrawal, Archna, Puri, Rajeev
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23983287
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.115621
_version_ 1782281109036335104
author Saxena, Arpita
Madan, Manish
Shrivastava, Uma
Mittal, Apurva
Dwivedi, Yogita
Agrawal, Archna
Puri, Rajeev
author_facet Saxena, Arpita
Madan, Manish
Shrivastava, Uma
Mittal, Apurva
Dwivedi, Yogita
Agrawal, Archna
Puri, Rajeev
author_sort Saxena, Arpita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Truview EVO2(C) laryngoscope (TL) is a recently introduced optical device designed to provide an unmagnified anterior image of the glottic opening and allow indirect laryngoscopy. AIM: This study is designed to determine whether the TL is a better alternative to the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML) for routine endotracheal intubations in patients with usual airway characteristics. METHODS: We compared the Truview EVO2(C) and MLs in 140 elective surgical patients requiring general anaesthesia and intubation in a prospective crossover fashion. The two blades were compared in terms of Cormack and Lehane grades, time required for intubation, anaesthetists’ assessment of ease of intubation, intubation difficulty score, attempts at intubation, success rate, soft tissue damage and arterial oxygen saturation during laryngoscopy. The Student t test and Chi-square test were used to determine the statistical significance of parametric data and categorical data, respectively. RESULTS: The Truview EVO2(C) blade provided a better laryngoscopic view than the Macintosh blade as suggested by improved Cormack and Lehane grades (in 48 patients), but required a longer time for intubation than the Macintosh blade (34.1 vs. 22.4 s), i.e., an improved view at the cost of longer mean intubation time. In spite of lower intubation difficulty scores, Truview EVO2(C) was considered as difficult to use on subjective assessment by the anaesthesiologist when compared with Macintosh. There was no difference observed between the two groups in attempts at intubation, success rate, soft tissue damage and arterial oxygen saturation during laryngoscopy. CONCLUSION: We opine that although Truview provides a better laryngoscopic view than Macintosh in difficult cases, it does not have an extra benefit over Macintosh otherwise, further indicating the need for more experience with the use of a Truview laryngoscope.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3748683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37486832013-08-27 Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope Saxena, Arpita Madan, Manish Shrivastava, Uma Mittal, Apurva Dwivedi, Yogita Agrawal, Archna Puri, Rajeev Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND: The Truview EVO2(C) laryngoscope (TL) is a recently introduced optical device designed to provide an unmagnified anterior image of the glottic opening and allow indirect laryngoscopy. AIM: This study is designed to determine whether the TL is a better alternative to the Macintosh laryngoscope (ML) for routine endotracheal intubations in patients with usual airway characteristics. METHODS: We compared the Truview EVO2(C) and MLs in 140 elective surgical patients requiring general anaesthesia and intubation in a prospective crossover fashion. The two blades were compared in terms of Cormack and Lehane grades, time required for intubation, anaesthetists’ assessment of ease of intubation, intubation difficulty score, attempts at intubation, success rate, soft tissue damage and arterial oxygen saturation during laryngoscopy. The Student t test and Chi-square test were used to determine the statistical significance of parametric data and categorical data, respectively. RESULTS: The Truview EVO2(C) blade provided a better laryngoscopic view than the Macintosh blade as suggested by improved Cormack and Lehane grades (in 48 patients), but required a longer time for intubation than the Macintosh blade (34.1 vs. 22.4 s), i.e., an improved view at the cost of longer mean intubation time. In spite of lower intubation difficulty scores, Truview EVO2(C) was considered as difficult to use on subjective assessment by the anaesthesiologist when compared with Macintosh. There was no difference observed between the two groups in attempts at intubation, success rate, soft tissue damage and arterial oxygen saturation during laryngoscopy. CONCLUSION: We opine that although Truview provides a better laryngoscopic view than Macintosh in difficult cases, it does not have an extra benefit over Macintosh otherwise, further indicating the need for more experience with the use of a Truview laryngoscope. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3748683/ /pubmed/23983287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.115621 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Saxena, Arpita
Madan, Manish
Shrivastava, Uma
Mittal, Apurva
Dwivedi, Yogita
Agrawal, Archna
Puri, Rajeev
Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope
title Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope
title_full Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope
title_fullStr Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope
title_full_unstemmed Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope
title_short Role of the Truview EVO2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: A comparison with the Macintosh laryngoscope
title_sort role of the truview evo2 laryngoscope in the airway management of elective surgical patients: a comparison with the macintosh laryngoscope
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23983287
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.115621
work_keys_str_mv AT saxenaarpita roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope
AT madanmanish roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope
AT shrivastavauma roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope
AT mittalapurva roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope
AT dwivediyogita roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope
AT agrawalarchna roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope
AT purirajeev roleofthetruviewevo2laryngoscopeintheairwaymanagementofelectivesurgicalpatientsacomparisonwiththemacintoshlaryngoscope