Cargando…
Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes
Purpose. To compare the measurements of optical versus ultrasonic biometry devices in keratoconic eyes. Materials and Methods. Forty-two eyes of 42 keratoconus (KC) patients enrolled in the study were examined. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were noted, and detailed ophthal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/481238 |
_version_ | 1782281120098811904 |
---|---|
author | Çınar, Yasin Cingü, Abdullah Kürşat Şahin, Muhammed Şahin, Alparslan Yüksel, Harun Türkcü, Fatih Mehmet Çınar, Tuba Çaça, İhsan |
author_facet | Çınar, Yasin Cingü, Abdullah Kürşat Şahin, Muhammed Şahin, Alparslan Yüksel, Harun Türkcü, Fatih Mehmet Çınar, Tuba Çaça, İhsan |
author_sort | Çınar, Yasin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To compare the measurements of optical versus ultrasonic biometry devices in keratoconic eyes. Materials and Methods. Forty-two eyes of 42 keratoconus (KC) patients enrolled in the study were examined. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were noted, and detailed ophthalmological examination was performed. Following Pentacam measurements, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were obtained using the Lenstar and US biometer to determine the reproducibility of the measurements between the two devices in keratoconic eyes. The Bland-Altman method was used to describe the agreement between the two devices. Results. The Lenstar could not measure at least one of the biometric properties in one eye and did not automatically give the corrected ACD in 2/3 of our study population. The Lenstar measured CCT (average difference 5.4 ± 19.6 µm; ICC = 0.90; P < 0.001), LT (average difference 0.13 ± 0.17 mm; ICC = 0.67; P < 0.001), and AL (average difference 0.10 ± 0.76 mm; ICC = 0.75; P < 0.001) thinner than US biometer, whereas it measured ACD (average difference 0.18 ± 0.17 mm; ICC = 0.85; P < 0.001) deeper than US biometer in keratoconic eyes. Conclusion. Although the difference between the measurements obtained using the two devices might be clinically acceptable, US biometry and Lenstar should not be used interchangeably for biometric measurements in KC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3748737 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37487372013-08-28 Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes Çınar, Yasin Cingü, Abdullah Kürşat Şahin, Muhammed Şahin, Alparslan Yüksel, Harun Türkcü, Fatih Mehmet Çınar, Tuba Çaça, İhsan J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To compare the measurements of optical versus ultrasonic biometry devices in keratoconic eyes. Materials and Methods. Forty-two eyes of 42 keratoconus (KC) patients enrolled in the study were examined. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were noted, and detailed ophthalmological examination was performed. Following Pentacam measurements, central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), and axial length (AL) were obtained using the Lenstar and US biometer to determine the reproducibility of the measurements between the two devices in keratoconic eyes. The Bland-Altman method was used to describe the agreement between the two devices. Results. The Lenstar could not measure at least one of the biometric properties in one eye and did not automatically give the corrected ACD in 2/3 of our study population. The Lenstar measured CCT (average difference 5.4 ± 19.6 µm; ICC = 0.90; P < 0.001), LT (average difference 0.13 ± 0.17 mm; ICC = 0.67; P < 0.001), and AL (average difference 0.10 ± 0.76 mm; ICC = 0.75; P < 0.001) thinner than US biometer, whereas it measured ACD (average difference 0.18 ± 0.17 mm; ICC = 0.85; P < 0.001) deeper than US biometer in keratoconic eyes. Conclusion. Although the difference between the measurements obtained using the two devices might be clinically acceptable, US biometry and Lenstar should not be used interchangeably for biometric measurements in KC patients. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3748737/ /pubmed/23986865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/481238 Text en Copyright © 2013 Yasin Çınar et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Çınar, Yasin Cingü, Abdullah Kürşat Şahin, Muhammed Şahin, Alparslan Yüksel, Harun Türkcü, Fatih Mehmet Çınar, Tuba Çaça, İhsan Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes |
title | Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes |
title_full | Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes |
title_short | Comparison of Optical versus Ultrasonic Biometry in Keratoconic Eyes |
title_sort | comparison of optical versus ultrasonic biometry in keratoconic eyes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748737/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/481238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cınaryasin comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT cinguabdullahkursat comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT sahinmuhammed comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT sahinalparslan comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT yukselharun comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT turkcufatihmehmet comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT cınartuba comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes AT cacaihsan comparisonofopticalversusultrasonicbiometryinkeratoconiceyes |