Cargando…
Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium
AIM: Crowdsourcing is the process of outsourcing numerous tasks to many untrained individuals. Our aim was to assess the performance and repeatability of crowdsourcing for the classification of retinal fundus photography. METHODS: One hundred retinal fundus photograph images with pre-determined dise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3749186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071154 |
_version_ | 1782281164034146304 |
---|---|
author | Mitry, Danny Peto, Tunde Hayat, Shabina Morgan, James E. Khaw, Kay-Tee Foster, Paul J. |
author_facet | Mitry, Danny Peto, Tunde Hayat, Shabina Morgan, James E. Khaw, Kay-Tee Foster, Paul J. |
author_sort | Mitry, Danny |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Crowdsourcing is the process of outsourcing numerous tasks to many untrained individuals. Our aim was to assess the performance and repeatability of crowdsourcing for the classification of retinal fundus photography. METHODS: One hundred retinal fundus photograph images with pre-determined disease criteria were selected by experts from a large cohort study. After reading brief instructions and an example classification, we requested that knowledge workers (KWs) from a crowdsourcing platform classified each image as normal or abnormal with grades of severity. Each image was classified 20 times by different KWs. Four study designs were examined to assess the effect of varying incentive and KW experience in classification accuracy. All study designs were conducted twice to examine repeatability. Performance was assessed by comparing the sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Without restriction on eligible participants, two thousand classifications of 100 images were received in under 24 hours at minimal cost. In trial 1 all study designs had an AUC (95%CI) of 0.701(0.680–0.721) or greater for classification of normal/abnormal. In trial 1, the highest AUC (95%CI) for normal/abnormal classification was 0.757 (0.738–0.776) for KWs with moderate experience. Comparable results were observed in trial 2. In trial 1, between 64–86% of any abnormal image was correctly classified by over half of all KWs. In trial 2, this ranged between 74–97%. Sensitivity was ≥96% for normal versus severely abnormal detections across all trials. Sensitivity for normal versus mildly abnormal varied between 61–79% across trials. CONCLUSIONS: With minimal training, crowdsourcing represents an accurate, rapid and cost-effective method of retinal image analysis which demonstrates good repeatability. Larger studies with more comprehensive participant training are needed to explore the utility of this compelling technique in large scale medical image analysis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3749186 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37491862013-08-29 Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium Mitry, Danny Peto, Tunde Hayat, Shabina Morgan, James E. Khaw, Kay-Tee Foster, Paul J. PLoS One Research Article AIM: Crowdsourcing is the process of outsourcing numerous tasks to many untrained individuals. Our aim was to assess the performance and repeatability of crowdsourcing for the classification of retinal fundus photography. METHODS: One hundred retinal fundus photograph images with pre-determined disease criteria were selected by experts from a large cohort study. After reading brief instructions and an example classification, we requested that knowledge workers (KWs) from a crowdsourcing platform classified each image as normal or abnormal with grades of severity. Each image was classified 20 times by different KWs. Four study designs were examined to assess the effect of varying incentive and KW experience in classification accuracy. All study designs were conducted twice to examine repeatability. Performance was assessed by comparing the sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: Without restriction on eligible participants, two thousand classifications of 100 images were received in under 24 hours at minimal cost. In trial 1 all study designs had an AUC (95%CI) of 0.701(0.680–0.721) or greater for classification of normal/abnormal. In trial 1, the highest AUC (95%CI) for normal/abnormal classification was 0.757 (0.738–0.776) for KWs with moderate experience. Comparable results were observed in trial 2. In trial 1, between 64–86% of any abnormal image was correctly classified by over half of all KWs. In trial 2, this ranged between 74–97%. Sensitivity was ≥96% for normal versus severely abnormal detections across all trials. Sensitivity for normal versus mildly abnormal varied between 61–79% across trials. CONCLUSIONS: With minimal training, crowdsourcing represents an accurate, rapid and cost-effective method of retinal image analysis which demonstrates good repeatability. Larger studies with more comprehensive participant training are needed to explore the utility of this compelling technique in large scale medical image analysis. Public Library of Science 2013-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3749186/ /pubmed/23990935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071154 Text en © 2013 Mitry et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mitry, Danny Peto, Tunde Hayat, Shabina Morgan, James E. Khaw, Kay-Tee Foster, Paul J. Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium |
title | Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium |
title_full | Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium |
title_fullStr | Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium |
title_full_unstemmed | Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium |
title_short | Crowdsourcing as a Novel Technique for Retinal Fundus Photography Classification: Analysis of Images in the EPIC Norfolk Cohort on Behalf of the UKBiobank Eye and Vision Consortium |
title_sort | crowdsourcing as a novel technique for retinal fundus photography classification: analysis of images in the epic norfolk cohort on behalf of the ukbiobank eye and vision consortium |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3749186/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990935 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071154 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mitrydanny crowdsourcingasanoveltechniqueforretinalfundusphotographyclassificationanalysisofimagesintheepicnorfolkcohortonbehalfoftheukbiobankeyeandvisionconsortium AT petotunde crowdsourcingasanoveltechniqueforretinalfundusphotographyclassificationanalysisofimagesintheepicnorfolkcohortonbehalfoftheukbiobankeyeandvisionconsortium AT hayatshabina crowdsourcingasanoveltechniqueforretinalfundusphotographyclassificationanalysisofimagesintheepicnorfolkcohortonbehalfoftheukbiobankeyeandvisionconsortium AT morganjamese crowdsourcingasanoveltechniqueforretinalfundusphotographyclassificationanalysisofimagesintheepicnorfolkcohortonbehalfoftheukbiobankeyeandvisionconsortium AT khawkaytee crowdsourcingasanoveltechniqueforretinalfundusphotographyclassificationanalysisofimagesintheepicnorfolkcohortonbehalfoftheukbiobankeyeandvisionconsortium AT fosterpaulj crowdsourcingasanoveltechniqueforretinalfundusphotographyclassificationanalysisofimagesintheepicnorfolkcohortonbehalfoftheukbiobankeyeandvisionconsortium |