Cargando…

The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers

Empathy is inherently interpersonal, but the majority of research has only examined observers. Targets of need have been largely held constant through hypothetical and fictionalized depictions of sympathetic distress and need. In the real world, people's response to life stressors varies widely...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Preston, Stephanie D., Hofelich, Alicia J., Stansfield, R. Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3749372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00488
_version_ 1782281190853574656
author Preston, Stephanie D.
Hofelich, Alicia J.
Stansfield, R. Brent
author_facet Preston, Stephanie D.
Hofelich, Alicia J.
Stansfield, R. Brent
author_sort Preston, Stephanie D.
collection PubMed
description Empathy is inherently interpersonal, but the majority of research has only examined observers. Targets of need have been largely held constant through hypothetical and fictionalized depictions of sympathetic distress and need. In the real world, people's response to life stressors varies widely—from stoicism to resilience to complete breakdown—variations that should profoundly influence the prosocial exchange. The current study examined naturally-varying affect in real hospital patients with serious chronic or terminal illness during videotaped interviews about quality of life. Participants viewed each video while psychophysiological data were recorded and then rated each patient's and their own emotion. Patients displayed three major emotion factors (disturbed, softhearted, and amused) that were used to classify them into five basic types (distraught, resilient, sanguine, reticent, wistful). These types elicited four major emotions in observers [personal distress (PD), empathic concern (EC), horror, pleasure], two of which were never discovered previously with fictionalized targets. Across studies and measures, distraught targets usually received the greatest aid, but approximately as many observers preferred the positive and likeable resilient patients or the quietly sad wistful targets, with multiple observers even giving their greatest aid to sanguine or reticent targets who did not display distress or need. Trait empathy motivated aid toward more emotive targets while perspective taking (PT) motivated aid for those who did not overtly display distress. A second study replicated key results without even providing the content of patients' speech. Through an ecological examination of real need we discovered variation and commonality in the emotional response to need that interacts strongly with the preferences of observers. Social interactions need to be studied in ethological contexts that retain the complex interplay between senders and receivers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3749372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37493722013-08-28 The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers Preston, Stephanie D. Hofelich, Alicia J. Stansfield, R. Brent Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Empathy is inherently interpersonal, but the majority of research has only examined observers. Targets of need have been largely held constant through hypothetical and fictionalized depictions of sympathetic distress and need. In the real world, people's response to life stressors varies widely—from stoicism to resilience to complete breakdown—variations that should profoundly influence the prosocial exchange. The current study examined naturally-varying affect in real hospital patients with serious chronic or terminal illness during videotaped interviews about quality of life. Participants viewed each video while psychophysiological data were recorded and then rated each patient's and their own emotion. Patients displayed three major emotion factors (disturbed, softhearted, and amused) that were used to classify them into five basic types (distraught, resilient, sanguine, reticent, wistful). These types elicited four major emotions in observers [personal distress (PD), empathic concern (EC), horror, pleasure], two of which were never discovered previously with fictionalized targets. Across studies and measures, distraught targets usually received the greatest aid, but approximately as many observers preferred the positive and likeable resilient patients or the quietly sad wistful targets, with multiple observers even giving their greatest aid to sanguine or reticent targets who did not display distress or need. Trait empathy motivated aid toward more emotive targets while perspective taking (PT) motivated aid for those who did not overtly display distress. A second study replicated key results without even providing the content of patients' speech. Through an ecological examination of real need we discovered variation and commonality in the emotional response to need that interacts strongly with the preferences of observers. Social interactions need to be studied in ethological contexts that retain the complex interplay between senders and receivers. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3749372/ /pubmed/23986680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00488 Text en Copyright © 2013 Preston, Hofelich and Stansfield. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Preston, Stephanie D.
Hofelich, Alicia J.
Stansfield, R. Brent
The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
title The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
title_full The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
title_fullStr The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
title_full_unstemmed The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
title_short The ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
title_sort ethology of empathy: a taxonomy of real-world targets of need and their effect on observers
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3749372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00488
work_keys_str_mv AT prestonstephanied theethologyofempathyataxonomyofrealworldtargetsofneedandtheireffectonobservers
AT hofelichaliciaj theethologyofempathyataxonomyofrealworldtargetsofneedandtheireffectonobservers
AT stansfieldrbrent theethologyofempathyataxonomyofrealworldtargetsofneedandtheireffectonobservers
AT prestonstephanied ethologyofempathyataxonomyofrealworldtargetsofneedandtheireffectonobservers
AT hofelichaliciaj ethologyofempathyataxonomyofrealworldtargetsofneedandtheireffectonobservers
AT stansfieldrbrent ethologyofempathyataxonomyofrealworldtargetsofneedandtheireffectonobservers