Cargando…
Causal Rasch models
Rasch's unidimensional models for measurement show how to connect object measures (e.g., reader abilities), measurement mechanisms (e.g., machine-generated cloze reading items), and observational outcomes (e.g., counts correct on reading instruments). Substantive theory shows what interventions...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00536 |
_version_ | 1782477076748566528 |
---|---|
author | Stenner, A. Jackson Fisher, William P. Stone, Mark H. Burdick, Donald S. |
author_facet | Stenner, A. Jackson Fisher, William P. Stone, Mark H. Burdick, Donald S. |
author_sort | Stenner, A. Jackson |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rasch's unidimensional models for measurement show how to connect object measures (e.g., reader abilities), measurement mechanisms (e.g., machine-generated cloze reading items), and observational outcomes (e.g., counts correct on reading instruments). Substantive theory shows what interventions or manipulations to the measurement mechanism can be traded off against a change to the object measure to hold the observed outcome constant. A Rasch model integrated with a substantive theory dictates the form and substance of permissible interventions. Rasch analysis, absent construct theory and an associated specification equation, is a black box in which understanding may be more illusory than not. Finally, the quantitative hypothesis can be tested by comparing theory-based trade-off relations with observed trade-off relations. Only quantitative variables (as measured) support such trade-offs. Note that to test the quantitative hypothesis requires more than manipulation of the algebraic equivalencies in the Rasch model or descriptively fitting data to the model. A causal Rasch model involves experimental intervention/manipulation on either reader ability or text complexity or a conjoint intervention on both simultaneously to yield a successful prediction of the resultant observed outcome (count correct). We conjecture that when this type of manipulation is introduced for individual reader text encounters and model predictions are consistent with observations, the quantitative hypothesis is sustained. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3750201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37502012013-08-28 Causal Rasch models Stenner, A. Jackson Fisher, William P. Stone, Mark H. Burdick, Donald S. Front Psychol Psychology Rasch's unidimensional models for measurement show how to connect object measures (e.g., reader abilities), measurement mechanisms (e.g., machine-generated cloze reading items), and observational outcomes (e.g., counts correct on reading instruments). Substantive theory shows what interventions or manipulations to the measurement mechanism can be traded off against a change to the object measure to hold the observed outcome constant. A Rasch model integrated with a substantive theory dictates the form and substance of permissible interventions. Rasch analysis, absent construct theory and an associated specification equation, is a black box in which understanding may be more illusory than not. Finally, the quantitative hypothesis can be tested by comparing theory-based trade-off relations with observed trade-off relations. Only quantitative variables (as measured) support such trade-offs. Note that to test the quantitative hypothesis requires more than manipulation of the algebraic equivalencies in the Rasch model or descriptively fitting data to the model. A causal Rasch model involves experimental intervention/manipulation on either reader ability or text complexity or a conjoint intervention on both simultaneously to yield a successful prediction of the resultant observed outcome (count correct). We conjecture that when this type of manipulation is introduced for individual reader text encounters and model predictions are consistent with observations, the quantitative hypothesis is sustained. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-08-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3750201/ /pubmed/23986726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00536 Text en Copyright © 2013 Stenner, Fisher, Stone and Burdick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Stenner, A. Jackson Fisher, William P. Stone, Mark H. Burdick, Donald S. Causal Rasch models |
title | Causal Rasch models |
title_full | Causal Rasch models |
title_fullStr | Causal Rasch models |
title_full_unstemmed | Causal Rasch models |
title_short | Causal Rasch models |
title_sort | causal rasch models |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23986726 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00536 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stennerajackson causalraschmodels AT fisherwilliamp causalraschmodels AT stonemarkh causalraschmodels AT burdickdonalds causalraschmodels |