Cargando…

Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Plantar calluses are a common cause of foot pain, which can have a detrimental impact on the mobility and independence of older people. Scalpel debridement is often the first treatment used for this condition. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of scalpel debridement of painful pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Landorf, Karl B, Morrow, Adam, Spink, Martin J, Nash, Chelsey L, Novak, Anna, Potter, Julia, Menz, Hylton B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-243
_version_ 1782477086046289920
author Landorf, Karl B
Morrow, Adam
Spink, Martin J
Nash, Chelsey L
Novak, Anna
Potter, Julia
Menz, Hylton B
author_facet Landorf, Karl B
Morrow, Adam
Spink, Martin J
Nash, Chelsey L
Novak, Anna
Potter, Julia
Menz, Hylton B
author_sort Landorf, Karl B
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Plantar calluses are a common cause of foot pain, which can have a detrimental impact on the mobility and independence of older people. Scalpel debridement is often the first treatment used for this condition. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of scalpel debridement of painful plantar calluses in older people. METHODS: This study was a parallel-group, participant- and assessor-blinded randomized trial. Eighty participants aged 65 years and older with painful forefoot plantar calluses were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups: either real or sham scalpel debridement. Participants were followed for six weeks after their initial intervention appointment. The primary outcomes measured were the difference between groups in pain (measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale) immediately post-intervention, and at one, three and six weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: Both the real debridement and sham debridement groups experienced a reduction in pain when compared with baseline. Small, systematic between-group differences in pain scores were found at each time point (between 2 and 7 mm favoring real scalpel debridement); however, none of these were statistically significant and none reached a level that could be considered clinically worthwhile. Scalpel debridement caused no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of real scalpel debridement for reducing pain associated with forefoot plantar calluses in older people are small and not statistically significant compared with sham scalpel debridement. When used alone, scalpel debridement has a limited effect in the short term, although it is relatively inexpensive and causes few complications. However, these findings do not preclude the possibility of cumulative benefits over a longer time period or additive effects when combined with other interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN012606000176561).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750246
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37502462013-08-24 Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial Landorf, Karl B Morrow, Adam Spink, Martin J Nash, Chelsey L Novak, Anna Potter, Julia Menz, Hylton B Trials Research BACKGROUND: Plantar calluses are a common cause of foot pain, which can have a detrimental impact on the mobility and independence of older people. Scalpel debridement is often the first treatment used for this condition. Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of scalpel debridement of painful plantar calluses in older people. METHODS: This study was a parallel-group, participant- and assessor-blinded randomized trial. Eighty participants aged 65 years and older with painful forefoot plantar calluses were recruited. Participants were randomly allocated to one of two groups: either real or sham scalpel debridement. Participants were followed for six weeks after their initial intervention appointment. The primary outcomes measured were the difference between groups in pain (measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale) immediately post-intervention, and at one, three and six weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: Both the real debridement and sham debridement groups experienced a reduction in pain when compared with baseline. Small, systematic between-group differences in pain scores were found at each time point (between 2 and 7 mm favoring real scalpel debridement); however, none of these were statistically significant and none reached a level that could be considered clinically worthwhile. Scalpel debridement caused no adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of real scalpel debridement for reducing pain associated with forefoot plantar calluses in older people are small and not statistically significant compared with sham scalpel debridement. When used alone, scalpel debridement has a limited effect in the short term, although it is relatively inexpensive and causes few complications. However, these findings do not preclude the possibility of cumulative benefits over a longer time period or additive effects when combined with other interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN012606000176561). BioMed Central 2013-08-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3750246/ /pubmed/23915078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-243 Text en Copyright © 2013 Landorf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Landorf, Karl B
Morrow, Adam
Spink, Martin J
Nash, Chelsey L
Novak, Anna
Potter, Julia
Menz, Hylton B
Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
title Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
title_full Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
title_short Effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
title_sort effectiveness of scalpel debridement for painful plantar calluses in older people: a randomized trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750246/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-243
work_keys_str_mv AT landorfkarlb effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial
AT morrowadam effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial
AT spinkmartinj effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial
AT nashchelseyl effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial
AT novakanna effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial
AT potterjulia effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial
AT menzhyltonb effectivenessofscalpeldebridementforpainfulplantarcallusesinolderpeoplearandomizedtrial