Cargando…

Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Most patients who sustain mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms at 1 week and 1 month after injury. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of interventions initiated in acute settings for patients who experience mTBI. METHODS: We performed a systemati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gravel, Jocelyn, D’Angelo, Antonio, Carrière, Benoit, Crevier, Louis, Beauchamp, Miriam H, Chauny, Jean-Marc, Wassef, Maggy, Chaillet, Nils
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-63
_version_ 1782477113851379712
author Gravel, Jocelyn
D’Angelo, Antonio
Carrière, Benoit
Crevier, Louis
Beauchamp, Miriam H
Chauny, Jean-Marc
Wassef, Maggy
Chaillet, Nils
author_facet Gravel, Jocelyn
D’Angelo, Antonio
Carrière, Benoit
Crevier, Louis
Beauchamp, Miriam H
Chauny, Jean-Marc
Wassef, Maggy
Chaillet, Nils
author_sort Gravel, Jocelyn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Most patients who sustain mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms at 1 week and 1 month after injury. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of interventions initiated in acute settings for patients who experience mTBI. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all randomized clinical trials evaluating any intervention initiated in an acute setting for patients experiencing acute mTBI. All possible outcomes were included. The primary sources of identification were MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, from 1980 to August 2012. Hand searching of proceedings from five meetings related to mTBI was also performed. Study selection was conducted by two co-authors, and data abstraction was completed by a research assistant specialized in conducting systematic reviews. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias assessment tool. RESULTS: From a potential 15,156 studies, 1,268 abstracts were evaluated and 120 articles were read completely. Of these, 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. One study evaluated a pharmacological intervention, two evaluated activity restriction, one evaluated head computed tomography scan versus admission, four evaluated information interventions, and seven evaluated different follow-up interventions. Use of different outcome measures limited the possibilities for analysis. However, a meta-analysis of three studies evaluating various follow-up strategies versus routine follow-up or no follow-up failed to show any effect on three outcomes at 6 to 12 months post-trauma. In addition, a meta-analysis of two studies found no effect of an information intervention on headache at 3 months post-injury. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of well-designed clinical studies for patients who sustain mTBI. The large variability in outcomes measured in studies limits comparison between them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750385
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37503852013-08-24 Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review Gravel, Jocelyn D’Angelo, Antonio Carrière, Benoit Crevier, Louis Beauchamp, Miriam H Chauny, Jean-Marc Wassef, Maggy Chaillet, Nils Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Most patients who sustain mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have persistent symptoms at 1 week and 1 month after injury. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of interventions initiated in acute settings for patients who experience mTBI. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of all randomized clinical trials evaluating any intervention initiated in an acute setting for patients experiencing acute mTBI. All possible outcomes were included. The primary sources of identification were MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central register of Controlled Trials, from 1980 to August 2012. Hand searching of proceedings from five meetings related to mTBI was also performed. Study selection was conducted by two co-authors, and data abstraction was completed by a research assistant specialized in conducting systematic reviews. Study quality was evaluated using Cochrane’s Risk of Bias assessment tool. RESULTS: From a potential 15,156 studies, 1,268 abstracts were evaluated and 120 articles were read completely. Of these, 15 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. One study evaluated a pharmacological intervention, two evaluated activity restriction, one evaluated head computed tomography scan versus admission, four evaluated information interventions, and seven evaluated different follow-up interventions. Use of different outcome measures limited the possibilities for analysis. However, a meta-analysis of three studies evaluating various follow-up strategies versus routine follow-up or no follow-up failed to show any effect on three outcomes at 6 to 12 months post-trauma. In addition, a meta-analysis of two studies found no effect of an information intervention on headache at 3 months post-injury. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of well-designed clinical studies for patients who sustain mTBI. The large variability in outcomes measured in studies limits comparison between them. BioMed Central 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3750385/ /pubmed/23924958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-63 Text en Copyright © 2013 Gravel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Gravel, Jocelyn
D’Angelo, Antonio
Carrière, Benoit
Crevier, Louis
Beauchamp, Miriam H
Chauny, Jean-Marc
Wassef, Maggy
Chaillet, Nils
Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
title Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
title_full Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
title_short Interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
title_sort interventions provided in the acute phase for mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750385/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-2-63
work_keys_str_mv AT graveljocelyn interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT dangeloantonio interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT carrierebenoit interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT crevierlouis interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT beauchampmiriamh interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT chaunyjeanmarc interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT wassefmaggy interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview
AT chailletnils interventionsprovidedintheacutephaseformildtraumaticbraininjuryasystematicreview