Cargando…

Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!

BACKGROUND: One of the long-term effects in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) is the development of second cancers. In a cohort of CCS, this study describes how second cancers were presented, the way they were diagnosed, and the knowledge CCS had about their increased risk to develop a second cancer....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berendsen, A. J., Groot Nibbelink, A., Blaauwbroek, R., Berger, M. Y., Tissing, W. J. E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23906108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.824152
_version_ 1782281413341478912
author Berendsen, A. J.
Groot Nibbelink, A.
Blaauwbroek, R.
Berger, M. Y.
Tissing, W. J. E.
author_facet Berendsen, A. J.
Groot Nibbelink, A.
Blaauwbroek, R.
Berger, M. Y.
Tissing, W. J. E.
author_sort Berendsen, A. J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: One of the long-term effects in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) is the development of second cancers. In a cohort of CCS, this study describes how second cancers were presented, the way they were diagnosed, and the knowledge CCS had about their increased risk to develop a second cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selected participants were all adult five-year CCS (n = 1275) who were treated at the University Medical Center Groningen since 1965. Of these, 84 (6.6%) had developed a second cancer, of which 27 had died. The 57 survivors were asked to participate in a telephone interview. RESULTS: Of the 57 CCS, 35 (61%) participated. Together they had developed 45 second cancers. Most participants (97%) were seen at the long-term follow-up clinic. Of all second cancers, 89% caused symptoms. Of all second cancers, the majority (56%) were first presented at the general practitioner's (GP's) office and 20% at follow-up testing. Of these CCS, only 28% were aware of their increased risk of developing a second cancer. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to inform CCS continuously regarding their increased risk, as a relatively small percentage are aware of this. Since most of these patients first reported their symptoms to the GP, all GPs should be aware of this increased risk, in particular because this concerns cancer at a younger age than normally expected. A survivor care plan might be an effective way of communication with both CCS and GPs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750436
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37504362013-09-01 Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware! Berendsen, A. J. Groot Nibbelink, A. Blaauwbroek, R. Berger, M. Y. Tissing, W. J. E. Scand J Prim Health Care Original Article BACKGROUND: One of the long-term effects in childhood cancer survivors (CCS) is the development of second cancers. In a cohort of CCS, this study describes how second cancers were presented, the way they were diagnosed, and the knowledge CCS had about their increased risk to develop a second cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selected participants were all adult five-year CCS (n = 1275) who were treated at the University Medical Center Groningen since 1965. Of these, 84 (6.6%) had developed a second cancer, of which 27 had died. The 57 survivors were asked to participate in a telephone interview. RESULTS: Of the 57 CCS, 35 (61%) participated. Together they had developed 45 second cancers. Most participants (97%) were seen at the long-term follow-up clinic. Of all second cancers, 89% caused symptoms. Of all second cancers, the majority (56%) were first presented at the general practitioner's (GP's) office and 20% at follow-up testing. Of these CCS, only 28% were aware of their increased risk of developing a second cancer. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to inform CCS continuously regarding their increased risk, as a relatively small percentage are aware of this. Since most of these patients first reported their symptoms to the GP, all GPs should be aware of this increased risk, in particular because this concerns cancer at a younger age than normally expected. A survivor care plan might be an effective way of communication with both CCS and GPs. Informa Healthcare 2013-09 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3750436/ /pubmed/23906108 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.824152 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Berendsen, A. J.
Groot Nibbelink, A.
Blaauwbroek, R.
Berger, M. Y.
Tissing, W. J. E.
Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!
title Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!
title_full Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!
title_fullStr Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!
title_full_unstemmed Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!
title_short Second cancers after childhood cancer – GPs beware!
title_sort second cancers after childhood cancer – gps beware!
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750436/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23906108
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.824152
work_keys_str_mv AT berendsenaj secondcancersafterchildhoodcancergpsbeware
AT grootnibbelinka secondcancersafterchildhoodcancergpsbeware
AT blaauwbroekr secondcancersafterchildhoodcancergpsbeware
AT bergermy secondcancersafterchildhoodcancergpsbeware
AT tissingwje secondcancersafterchildhoodcancergpsbeware