Cargando…

Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this paper is to investigate whether incorporating an electronic optional guideline tool (EOGT) in the standardized referral template used by general practitioners (GPs) when referring patients to specialized care can improve outpatient referral appropriateness. DESI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rokstad, Ingrid S., Rokstad, Kirsten S., Holmen, Sissel, Lehmann, Sverre, Assmus, Jörg
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23941087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.824155
_version_ 1782281414068142080
author Rokstad, Ingrid S.
Rokstad, Kirsten S.
Holmen, Sissel
Lehmann, Sverre
Assmus, Jörg
author_facet Rokstad, Ingrid S.
Rokstad, Kirsten S.
Holmen, Sissel
Lehmann, Sverre
Assmus, Jörg
author_sort Rokstad, Ingrid S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this paper is to investigate whether incorporating an electronic optional guideline tool (EOGT) in the standardized referral template used by general practitioners (GPs) when referring patients to specialized care can improve outpatient referral appropriateness. DESIGN: Intervention study with an intervention and a control group. SETTING: 210 GPs in the municipality of Bergen and the Department of Thoracic Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital. SUBJECTS: 2400 patients referred to the Department of Thoracic Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital. RESULTS: An electronic optional guideline tool (EOGT) was implemented on 93 of 210 GPs’ computer systems. The referral quality and the time spent reviewing each referral were evaluated by the hospital specialists. The GPs did not know that their referrals were being evaluated. The specialists were blinded with regard to information concerning the intervention and the control group. The specialists reported significantly higher referral quality and considerably less time spent on evaluating referrals when using the EOGT, with an overall time reduction of 34%. Likewise, GPs also reported that the EOGT was easy to use, time-saving and led to an improved quality of their referrals. CONCLUSION: This study documents an improvement in the quality of the referrals. Since the GPs save time by using the EOGT, there is no reason to believe that they will discontinue using it. In fact, the tool may be even more beneficial for the GP. The authors believe that it is possible to implement the EOGT as a standard referral tool within various fields of medicine and are currently in the process of developing these tools.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37504392013-09-01 Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study Rokstad, Ingrid S. Rokstad, Kirsten S. Holmen, Sissel Lehmann, Sverre Assmus, Jörg Scand J Prim Health Care Original Article OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this paper is to investigate whether incorporating an electronic optional guideline tool (EOGT) in the standardized referral template used by general practitioners (GPs) when referring patients to specialized care can improve outpatient referral appropriateness. DESIGN: Intervention study with an intervention and a control group. SETTING: 210 GPs in the municipality of Bergen and the Department of Thoracic Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital. SUBJECTS: 2400 patients referred to the Department of Thoracic Medicine at Haukeland University Hospital. RESULTS: An electronic optional guideline tool (EOGT) was implemented on 93 of 210 GPs’ computer systems. The referral quality and the time spent reviewing each referral were evaluated by the hospital specialists. The GPs did not know that their referrals were being evaluated. The specialists were blinded with regard to information concerning the intervention and the control group. The specialists reported significantly higher referral quality and considerably less time spent on evaluating referrals when using the EOGT, with an overall time reduction of 34%. Likewise, GPs also reported that the EOGT was easy to use, time-saving and led to an improved quality of their referrals. CONCLUSION: This study documents an improvement in the quality of the referrals. Since the GPs save time by using the EOGT, there is no reason to believe that they will discontinue using it. In fact, the tool may be even more beneficial for the GP. The authors believe that it is possible to implement the EOGT as a standard referral tool within various fields of medicine and are currently in the process of developing these tools. Informa Healthcare 2013-09 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3750439/ /pubmed/23941087 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.824155 Text en © 2013 Informa Healthcare http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rokstad, Ingrid S.
Rokstad, Kirsten S.
Holmen, Sissel
Lehmann, Sverre
Assmus, Jörg
Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study
title Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study
title_full Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study
title_fullStr Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study
title_full_unstemmed Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study
title_short Electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: An intervention study
title_sort electronic optional guidelines as a tool to improve the process of referring patients to specialized care: an intervention study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23941087
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/02813432.2013.824155
work_keys_str_mv AT rokstadingrids electronicoptionalguidelinesasatooltoimprovetheprocessofreferringpatientstospecializedcareaninterventionstudy
AT rokstadkirstens electronicoptionalguidelinesasatooltoimprovetheprocessofreferringpatientstospecializedcareaninterventionstudy
AT holmensissel electronicoptionalguidelinesasatooltoimprovetheprocessofreferringpatientstospecializedcareaninterventionstudy
AT lehmannsverre electronicoptionalguidelinesasatooltoimprovetheprocessofreferringpatientstospecializedcareaninterventionstudy
AT assmusjorg electronicoptionalguidelinesasatooltoimprovetheprocessofreferringpatientstospecializedcareaninterventionstudy