Cargando…

Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a common and costly illness, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite this, there is relatively little information on the ‘real-world’ medication utilization patterns for patients with type 2 diabetes initiating exenatide BID or glargine. The object...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pawaskar, Manjiri, Bonafede, Machaon, Johnson, Barbara, Fowler, Robert, Lenhart, Gregory, Hoogwerf, Byron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-13-20
_version_ 1782281415963967488
author Pawaskar, Manjiri
Bonafede, Machaon
Johnson, Barbara
Fowler, Robert
Lenhart, Gregory
Hoogwerf, Byron
author_facet Pawaskar, Manjiri
Bonafede, Machaon
Johnson, Barbara
Fowler, Robert
Lenhart, Gregory
Hoogwerf, Byron
author_sort Pawaskar, Manjiri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a common and costly illness, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite this, there is relatively little information on the ‘real-world’ medication utilization patterns for patients with type 2 diabetes initiating exenatide BID or glargine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ‘real-world’ medication utilization patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide BID (exenatide) versus insulin glargine (glargine). METHODS: Adult patients( ≥18 years of age) with type 2 diabetes who were new initiators of exenatide or glargine from October 1, 2006 through March 31, 2008 with continuous enrollment for the 12 months pre- and 18 months post-index period were selected from the MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching was used to complete a 1:1 match of glargine to exenatide patients. Key study outcomes (including the likelihood of overall treatment modification, discontinuation, switching, or intensification) were analyzed using survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9,197 exenatide- and 4,499 glargine-treated patients were selected. Propensity score matching resulted in 3,774 matched pairs with a mean age of 57 years and a mean Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 1.6; 54% of patients were males. The 18-month treatment intensification rates were 15.9% and 26.0% (p < 0.0001) and the discontinuation rates were 38.3% and 40.0% (p = 0.14) for exenatide and glargine, respectively. Alternatively, 14.9% of exenatide-treated patients switched therapies, compared to 10.0% of glargine-treated patients (p < 0.0001). Overall, glargine-treated patients were more likely to modify their treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.33, p < 0.0001] with shorter mean time on treatment until modification (123 vs. 159 days, p < 0.0001). Compared to exenatide-treated patients, glargine-treated patients were more likely to discontinue [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.25, p < 0.0001] or intensify therapy (HR = 1.72, p < 0.0001) but less likely to switch (HR = 0.71, p < 0.0001) the index therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated for type 2 diabetes with exenatide BID or insulin glargine differ in their adherence to therapy. Exenatide-treated patients were less likely to discontinue or modify treatment but more likely to switch therapy compared to glargine-treated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37504472013-08-24 Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study Pawaskar, Manjiri Bonafede, Machaon Johnson, Barbara Fowler, Robert Lenhart, Gregory Hoogwerf, Byron BMC Endocr Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a common and costly illness, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite this, there is relatively little information on the ‘real-world’ medication utilization patterns for patients with type 2 diabetes initiating exenatide BID or glargine. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ‘real-world’ medication utilization patterns in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide BID (exenatide) versus insulin glargine (glargine). METHODS: Adult patients( ≥18 years of age) with type 2 diabetes who were new initiators of exenatide or glargine from October 1, 2006 through March 31, 2008 with continuous enrollment for the 12 months pre- and 18 months post-index period were selected from the MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Databases. To control for selection bias, propensity score matching was used to complete a 1:1 match of glargine to exenatide patients. Key study outcomes (including the likelihood of overall treatment modification, discontinuation, switching, or intensification) were analyzed using survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9,197 exenatide- and 4,499 glargine-treated patients were selected. Propensity score matching resulted in 3,774 matched pairs with a mean age of 57 years and a mean Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index score of 1.6; 54% of patients were males. The 18-month treatment intensification rates were 15.9% and 26.0% (p < 0.0001) and the discontinuation rates were 38.3% and 40.0% (p = 0.14) for exenatide and glargine, respectively. Alternatively, 14.9% of exenatide-treated patients switched therapies, compared to 10.0% of glargine-treated patients (p < 0.0001). Overall, glargine-treated patients were more likely to modify their treatment [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.33, p < 0.0001] with shorter mean time on treatment until modification (123 vs. 159 days, p < 0.0001). Compared to exenatide-treated patients, glargine-treated patients were more likely to discontinue [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.25, p < 0.0001] or intensify therapy (HR = 1.72, p < 0.0001) but less likely to switch (HR = 0.71, p < 0.0001) the index therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated for type 2 diabetes with exenatide BID or insulin glargine differ in their adherence to therapy. Exenatide-treated patients were less likely to discontinue or modify treatment but more likely to switch therapy compared to glargine-treated patients. BioMed Central 2013-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3750447/ /pubmed/23799930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-13-20 Text en Copyright © 2013 Pawaskar et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pawaskar, Manjiri
Bonafede, Machaon
Johnson, Barbara
Fowler, Robert
Lenhart, Gregory
Hoogwerf, Byron
Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
title Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
title_full Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
title_fullStr Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
title_full_unstemmed Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
title_short Medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating Exenatide BID or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
title_sort medication utilization patterns among type 2 diabetes patients initiating exenatide bid or insulin glargine: a retrospective database study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23799930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-13-20
work_keys_str_mv AT pawaskarmanjiri medicationutilizationpatternsamongtype2diabetespatientsinitiatingexenatidebidorinsulinglarginearetrospectivedatabasestudy
AT bonafedemachaon medicationutilizationpatternsamongtype2diabetespatientsinitiatingexenatidebidorinsulinglarginearetrospectivedatabasestudy
AT johnsonbarbara medicationutilizationpatternsamongtype2diabetespatientsinitiatingexenatidebidorinsulinglarginearetrospectivedatabasestudy
AT fowlerrobert medicationutilizationpatternsamongtype2diabetespatientsinitiatingexenatidebidorinsulinglarginearetrospectivedatabasestudy
AT lenhartgregory medicationutilizationpatternsamongtype2diabetespatientsinitiatingexenatidebidorinsulinglarginearetrospectivedatabasestudy
AT hoogwerfbyron medicationutilizationpatternsamongtype2diabetespatientsinitiatingexenatidebidorinsulinglarginearetrospectivedatabasestudy