Cargando…

Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing

BACKGROUND: Although migrant workers account for the majority of newborns in Beijing, their children are less likely to undergo appropriate universal newborn hearing screening/rescreening (UNHS) than newborns of local non-migrant residents. We hypothesised that this was at least in part due to the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qi, Beier, Cheng, Xiaohua, En, Hui, Liu, Bo, Peng, Shichun, Zhen, Yong, Cai, Zhenghua, Huang, Lihui, Zhang, Luo, Han, Demin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23926962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-116
_version_ 1782281430996353024
author Qi, Beier
Cheng, Xiaohua
En, Hui
Liu, Bo
Peng, Shichun
Zhen, Yong
Cai, Zhenghua
Huang, Lihui
Zhang, Luo
Han, Demin
author_facet Qi, Beier
Cheng, Xiaohua
En, Hui
Liu, Bo
Peng, Shichun
Zhen, Yong
Cai, Zhenghua
Huang, Lihui
Zhang, Luo
Han, Demin
author_sort Qi, Beier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although migrant workers account for the majority of newborns in Beijing, their children are less likely to undergo appropriate universal newborn hearing screening/rescreening (UNHS) than newborns of local non-migrant residents. We hypothesised that this was at least in part due to the inadequacy of the UNHS protocol currently employed for newborn babies, and therefore aimed to modify the protocol to specifically reflect the needs of the migrant population. METHODS: A total of 10,983 healthy babies born to migrant mothers between January 2007 and December 2009 at a Beijing public hospital were investigated for hearing abnormalities according to a modified UNHS protocol. This incorporated two additional/optional otoacoustic emissions (OAE) tests at 24–48 hours and 2 months after birth. Infants not passing a screening test were referred to the next test, until any hearing loss was confirmed by the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test. RESULTS: A total of 98.91% (10983/11104) of all newborn children underwent the initial OAE test, of which 27.22% (2990/10983) failed the test. 1712 of the failed babies underwent the second inpatient OAE test, with739 failing again; thus significantly decreasing the overall positive rate for abnormal hearing from 27.22% to 18.36% ([2990–973 /10983)]; p = 0). Overall, 1147(56.87%) babies underwent the outpatient OAE test again after1-month, of whom 228 failed and were referred for the second outpatient OAE test (i.e. 2.08% (228/10983) referral rate at 1month of age). 141 of these infants underwent the referral test, of whom 103 (73.05%) tested positive again and were referred for a final ABR test for hearing loss (i.e. final referral rate of 1.73% ([228-38/10983] at 2 months of age). Only 54 infants attended the ABR test and 35 (0.32% of the original cohort tested) were diagnosed with abnormal hearing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that it is feasible and practical to achieve high coverage rates for screening hearing loss and decrease the referral rates in newborn babies of migrant workers, using a modification of the currently employed UNHS protocol.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37505152013-08-24 Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing Qi, Beier Cheng, Xiaohua En, Hui Liu, Bo Peng, Shichun Zhen, Yong Cai, Zhenghua Huang, Lihui Zhang, Luo Han, Demin BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Although migrant workers account for the majority of newborns in Beijing, their children are less likely to undergo appropriate universal newborn hearing screening/rescreening (UNHS) than newborns of local non-migrant residents. We hypothesised that this was at least in part due to the inadequacy of the UNHS protocol currently employed for newborn babies, and therefore aimed to modify the protocol to specifically reflect the needs of the migrant population. METHODS: A total of 10,983 healthy babies born to migrant mothers between January 2007 and December 2009 at a Beijing public hospital were investigated for hearing abnormalities according to a modified UNHS protocol. This incorporated two additional/optional otoacoustic emissions (OAE) tests at 24–48 hours and 2 months after birth. Infants not passing a screening test were referred to the next test, until any hearing loss was confirmed by the auditory brainstem response (ABR) test. RESULTS: A total of 98.91% (10983/11104) of all newborn children underwent the initial OAE test, of which 27.22% (2990/10983) failed the test. 1712 of the failed babies underwent the second inpatient OAE test, with739 failing again; thus significantly decreasing the overall positive rate for abnormal hearing from 27.22% to 18.36% ([2990–973 /10983)]; p = 0). Overall, 1147(56.87%) babies underwent the outpatient OAE test again after1-month, of whom 228 failed and were referred for the second outpatient OAE test (i.e. 2.08% (228/10983) referral rate at 1month of age). 141 of these infants underwent the referral test, of whom 103 (73.05%) tested positive again and were referred for a final ABR test for hearing loss (i.e. final referral rate of 1.73% ([228-38/10983] at 2 months of age). Only 54 infants attended the ABR test and 35 (0.32% of the original cohort tested) were diagnosed with abnormal hearing. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that it is feasible and practical to achieve high coverage rates for screening hearing loss and decrease the referral rates in newborn babies of migrant workers, using a modification of the currently employed UNHS protocol. BioMed Central 2013-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3750515/ /pubmed/23926962 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-116 Text en Copyright © 2013 Qi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Qi, Beier
Cheng, Xiaohua
En, Hui
Liu, Bo
Peng, Shichun
Zhen, Yong
Cai, Zhenghua
Huang, Lihui
Zhang, Luo
Han, Demin
Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing
title Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing
title_full Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing
title_fullStr Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing
title_short Assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in Beijing
title_sort assessment of the feasibility and coverage of a modified universal hearing screening protocol for use with newborn babies of migrant workers in beijing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23926962
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-13-116
work_keys_str_mv AT qibeier assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT chengxiaohua assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT enhui assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT liubo assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT pengshichun assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT zhenyong assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT caizhenghua assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT huanglihui assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT zhangluo assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing
AT handemin assessmentofthefeasibilityandcoverageofamodifieduniversalhearingscreeningprotocolforusewithnewbornbabiesofmigrantworkersinbeijing