Cargando…

Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery

BACKGROUND: The optimal management of acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) associated with preexisting canal stenosis remains to be established. The objective of this study is to examine whether early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) would result in greater improvement in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chikuda, Hirotaka, Ohtsu, Hiroshi, Ogata, Toru, Sugita, Shurei, Sumitani, Masahiko, Koyama, Yurie, Matsumoto, Morio, Toyama, Yoshiaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-245
_version_ 1782281464494161920
author Chikuda, Hirotaka
Ohtsu, Hiroshi
Ogata, Toru
Sugita, Shurei
Sumitani, Masahiko
Koyama, Yurie
Matsumoto, Morio
Toyama, Yoshiaki
author_facet Chikuda, Hirotaka
Ohtsu, Hiroshi
Ogata, Toru
Sugita, Shurei
Sumitani, Masahiko
Koyama, Yurie
Matsumoto, Morio
Toyama, Yoshiaki
author_sort Chikuda, Hirotaka
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The optimal management of acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) associated with preexisting canal stenosis remains to be established. The objective of this study is to examine whether early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) would result in greater improvement in motor function compared with delayed surgery (later than two weeks) in cervical SCI patients presenting with canal stenosis, but without bony injury. METHODS/DESIGN: OSCIS is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, multicenter trial. We will recruit 100 cervical SCI patients who are admitted within 48 hours of injury (aged 20 to 79 years; without fractures or dislocations; American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade C; preexisting spinal canal stenosis). Patients will be enrolled from 36 participating hospitals across Japan and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) or delayed surgery following at least two weeks of conservative treatment. The primary outcomes include: 1) the change from baseline to one year in the ASIA motor score; 2) the total score of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure and 3) the proportion of patients who are able to walk without human assistance. The secondary outcomes are: 1) the health-related quality of life as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and the EuroQol 5 Dimension; 2) the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and 3) the walking status as evaluated with the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II. The analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary analysis will be a comparison of the primary and secondary outcomes one year after the injury. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide evidence of the potential benefit of early surgical decompression compared to the current ‘watch and wait’ strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000006780; NCT01485458
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3750661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37506612013-08-24 Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery Chikuda, Hirotaka Ohtsu, Hiroshi Ogata, Toru Sugita, Shurei Sumitani, Masahiko Koyama, Yurie Matsumoto, Morio Toyama, Yoshiaki Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The optimal management of acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) associated with preexisting canal stenosis remains to be established. The objective of this study is to examine whether early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) would result in greater improvement in motor function compared with delayed surgery (later than two weeks) in cervical SCI patients presenting with canal stenosis, but without bony injury. METHODS/DESIGN: OSCIS is a randomized, controlled, parallel-group, assessor-blinded, multicenter trial. We will recruit 100 cervical SCI patients who are admitted within 48 hours of injury (aged 20 to 79 years; without fractures or dislocations; American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade C; preexisting spinal canal stenosis). Patients will be enrolled from 36 participating hospitals across Japan and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either early surgical decompression (within 24 hours after admission) or delayed surgery following at least two weeks of conservative treatment. The primary outcomes include: 1) the change from baseline to one year in the ASIA motor score; 2) the total score of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure and 3) the proportion of patients who are able to walk without human assistance. The secondary outcomes are: 1) the health-related quality of life as measured by the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 and the EuroQol 5 Dimension; 2) the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory and 3) the walking status as evaluated with the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II. The analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary analysis will be a comparison of the primary and secondary outcomes one year after the injury. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will provide evidence of the potential benefit of early surgical decompression compared to the current ‘watch and wait’ strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000006780; NCT01485458 BioMed Central 2013-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3750661/ /pubmed/23924165 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-245 Text en Copyright © 2013 Chikuda et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Chikuda, Hirotaka
Ohtsu, Hiroshi
Ogata, Toru
Sugita, Shurei
Sumitani, Masahiko
Koyama, Yurie
Matsumoto, Morio
Toyama, Yoshiaki
Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
title Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
title_full Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
title_fullStr Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
title_full_unstemmed Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
title_short Optimal treatment for Spinal Cord Injury associated with cervical canal Stenosis (OSCIS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
title_sort optimal treatment for spinal cord injury associated with cervical canal stenosis (oscis): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing early versus delayed surgery
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3750661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23924165
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-245
work_keys_str_mv AT chikudahirotaka optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT ohtsuhiroshi optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT ogatatoru optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT sugitashurei optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT sumitanimasahiko optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT koyamayurie optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT matsumotomorio optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery
AT toyamayoshiaki optimaltreatmentforspinalcordinjuryassociatedwithcervicalcanalstenosisoscisastudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingearlyversusdelayedsurgery