Cargando…

Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation

BACKGROUND: Standardised evidenced-based materials and mechanisms to facilitate the delivery of the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation are not widely available. The aims of this study were: 1) to adapt the self-management programme Living Well with COPD (LWWCOPD) programme, for embeddin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cosgrove, Denise, MacMahon, Joseph, Bourbeau, Jean, Bradley, Judy M, O’Neill, Brenda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-13-50
_version_ 1782281540432035840
author Cosgrove, Denise
MacMahon, Joseph
Bourbeau, Jean
Bradley, Judy M
O’Neill, Brenda
author_facet Cosgrove, Denise
MacMahon, Joseph
Bourbeau, Jean
Bradley, Judy M
O’Neill, Brenda
author_sort Cosgrove, Denise
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standardised evidenced-based materials and mechanisms to facilitate the delivery of the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation are not widely available. The aims of this study were: 1) to adapt the self-management programme Living Well with COPD (LWWCOPD) programme, for embedding in pulmonary rehabilitation; and, 2) to conduct a process evaluation of the adapted programme. METHODS: The adaptations to the LWWCOPD programme were informed by focus groups, current practice, relevant research and guideline documents. Pulmonary rehabilitation sites used the adapted programme, the LWWCOPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation, to deliver the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation. A process evaluation was conducted: elements included reach (patients’ attendance rates), dose delivered (amount of programme delivered), dose received (health professional and patient satisfaction) and fidelity (impact on patients’ knowledge, understanding and self-efficacy on the Understanding COPD questionnaire). Descriptive statistics (mean, SD) were used to summarise demographics and key data from the feedback questionnaires. Qualitative feedback on the programme was collated and categorised. Changes in the Understanding COPD questionnaire were examined using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The LWWCOPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation was delivered in eleven hospital- and community-based programmes (n=25 health professionals, n=57 patients with COPD). It consisted of six weekly 30–45 minute sessions. The process evaluation showed positive results: 62.3% of patients attended ≥ 4 education sessions (reach); mean (SD) 90 (10)% of the session content were delivered (dose delivered); the majority of sessions were rated as excellent or good by health professionals and patients. Patients’ satisfaction was high: mean (SD) Section B of the Understanding COPD questionnaire: 91.67 (9.55)% (dose received). Knowledge, understanding and self-efficacy improved significantly: mean change (95% CI): Section A of the Understanding COPD questionnaire: 26.75 (21.74 to 31.76)%, BCKQ 10.64 (6.92 to 14.37)% (fidelity). CONCLUSION: This rigorous process evaluation has demonstrated that the LWWCOPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation can be used to deliver high quality, consistent and equitable education sessions during hospital and community-based pulmonary rehabilitation. This programme is now available worldwide (http://www.livingwellwithcopd.com/living-well-and-pulmonary-rehabilitation.html). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (reference number: NCT01226836)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751129
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37511292013-08-24 Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation Cosgrove, Denise MacMahon, Joseph Bourbeau, Jean Bradley, Judy M O’Neill, Brenda BMC Pulm Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Standardised evidenced-based materials and mechanisms to facilitate the delivery of the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation are not widely available. The aims of this study were: 1) to adapt the self-management programme Living Well with COPD (LWWCOPD) programme, for embedding in pulmonary rehabilitation; and, 2) to conduct a process evaluation of the adapted programme. METHODS: The adaptations to the LWWCOPD programme were informed by focus groups, current practice, relevant research and guideline documents. Pulmonary rehabilitation sites used the adapted programme, the LWWCOPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation, to deliver the education component of pulmonary rehabilitation. A process evaluation was conducted: elements included reach (patients’ attendance rates), dose delivered (amount of programme delivered), dose received (health professional and patient satisfaction) and fidelity (impact on patients’ knowledge, understanding and self-efficacy on the Understanding COPD questionnaire). Descriptive statistics (mean, SD) were used to summarise demographics and key data from the feedback questionnaires. Qualitative feedback on the programme was collated and categorised. Changes in the Understanding COPD questionnaire were examined using paired t-tests. RESULTS: The LWWCOPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation was delivered in eleven hospital- and community-based programmes (n=25 health professionals, n=57 patients with COPD). It consisted of six weekly 30–45 minute sessions. The process evaluation showed positive results: 62.3% of patients attended ≥ 4 education sessions (reach); mean (SD) 90 (10)% of the session content were delivered (dose delivered); the majority of sessions were rated as excellent or good by health professionals and patients. Patients’ satisfaction was high: mean (SD) Section B of the Understanding COPD questionnaire: 91.67 (9.55)% (dose received). Knowledge, understanding and self-efficacy improved significantly: mean change (95% CI): Section A of the Understanding COPD questionnaire: 26.75 (21.74 to 31.76)%, BCKQ 10.64 (6.92 to 14.37)% (fidelity). CONCLUSION: This rigorous process evaluation has demonstrated that the LWWCOPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation can be used to deliver high quality, consistent and equitable education sessions during hospital and community-based pulmonary rehabilitation. This programme is now available worldwide (http://www.livingwellwithcopd.com/living-well-and-pulmonary-rehabilitation.html). TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (reference number: NCT01226836) BioMed Central 2013-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3751129/ /pubmed/23915179 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-13-50 Text en Copyright © 2013 Cosgrove et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cosgrove, Denise
MacMahon, Joseph
Bourbeau, Jean
Bradley, Judy M
O’Neill, Brenda
Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
title Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
title_full Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
title_fullStr Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
title_short Facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the Living Well with COPD programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
title_sort facilitating education in pulmonary rehabilitation using the living well with copd programme for pulmonary rehabilitation: a process evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751129/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23915179
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-13-50
work_keys_str_mv AT cosgrovedenise facilitatingeducationinpulmonaryrehabilitationusingthelivingwellwithcopdprogrammeforpulmonaryrehabilitationaprocessevaluation
AT macmahonjoseph facilitatingeducationinpulmonaryrehabilitationusingthelivingwellwithcopdprogrammeforpulmonaryrehabilitationaprocessevaluation
AT bourbeaujean facilitatingeducationinpulmonaryrehabilitationusingthelivingwellwithcopdprogrammeforpulmonaryrehabilitationaprocessevaluation
AT bradleyjudym facilitatingeducationinpulmonaryrehabilitationusingthelivingwellwithcopdprogrammeforpulmonaryrehabilitationaprocessevaluation
AT oneillbrenda facilitatingeducationinpulmonaryrehabilitationusingthelivingwellwithcopdprogrammeforpulmonaryrehabilitationaprocessevaluation