Cargando…

Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review

BACKGROUND: Up to one third of BKP treated cases shows no appreciable height restoration due to loss of both restored height and kyphotic realignment after balloon deflation. This shortcoming has called for an improved method that maintains the height and realignment reached by the fully inflated ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Diel, Peter, Röder, Christoph, Perler, Gosia, Vordemvenne, Thomas, Scholz, Matti, Kandziora, Frank, Fürderer, Sebastian, Eiskjaer, Soren, Maestretti, Gianluca, Rotter, Robert, Benneker, Lorin Michael, Heini, Paul Friedhelm
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-233
_version_ 1782281547475320832
author Diel, Peter
Röder, Christoph
Perler, Gosia
Vordemvenne, Thomas
Scholz, Matti
Kandziora, Frank
Fürderer, Sebastian
Eiskjaer, Soren
Maestretti, Gianluca
Rotter, Robert
Benneker, Lorin Michael
Heini, Paul Friedhelm
author_facet Diel, Peter
Röder, Christoph
Perler, Gosia
Vordemvenne, Thomas
Scholz, Matti
Kandziora, Frank
Fürderer, Sebastian
Eiskjaer, Soren
Maestretti, Gianluca
Rotter, Robert
Benneker, Lorin Michael
Heini, Paul Friedhelm
author_sort Diel, Peter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Up to one third of BKP treated cases shows no appreciable height restoration due to loss of both restored height and kyphotic realignment after balloon deflation. This shortcoming has called for an improved method that maintains the height and realignment reached by the fully inflated balloon until stabilization of the vertebral body by PMMA-based cementation. Restoration of the physiological vertebral body height for pain relief and for preventing further fractures of adjacent and distant vertebral bodies must be the main aim for such a method. A new vertebral body stenting system (VBS) stabilizes the vertebral body after balloon deflation until cementation. The radiographic and safety results of the first 100 cases where VBS was applied are presented. METHODS: During the planning phase of an ongoing international multicenter RCT, radiographic, procedural and followup details were retrospectively transcribed from charts and xrays for developing and testing the case report forms. Radiographs were centrally assessed at the institution of the first/senior author. RESULTS: 100 patients (62 with osteoporosis) with a total of 103 fractured vertebral bodies were treated with the VBS system. 49 were females with a mean age of 73.2 years; males were 66.7 years old. The mean preoperative anterior-middle-posterior heights were 20.3-17.6-28.0 mm, respectively. The mean local kyphotic angle was 13.1°. The mean preoperative Beck Index (anterior edge height/posterior edge height) was 0.73, the mean alternative Beck Index (middle height/posterior edge height) was 0.63. The mean postoperative heights were restored to 24.5-24.6-30.4 mm, respectively. The mean local kyphotic angle was reduced to 8.9°. The mean postoperative Beck Index was 0.81, the mean alternative one was 0.82. The overall extrusion rate was 29.1%, the symptomatic one was 1%. In the osteoporosis subgroup there were 23.8% extrusions. Within the three months followup interval there were 9% of adjacent and 4% of remote new fractures, all in the osteoporotic group. CONCLUSIONS: VBS showed its strengths especially in realignment of crush and biconcave fractures. Given that fracture mobility is present, the realignment potential is sound and increases with the severity of preoperative vertebral body deformation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37511592013-08-24 Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review Diel, Peter Röder, Christoph Perler, Gosia Vordemvenne, Thomas Scholz, Matti Kandziora, Frank Fürderer, Sebastian Eiskjaer, Soren Maestretti, Gianluca Rotter, Robert Benneker, Lorin Michael Heini, Paul Friedhelm BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Up to one third of BKP treated cases shows no appreciable height restoration due to loss of both restored height and kyphotic realignment after balloon deflation. This shortcoming has called for an improved method that maintains the height and realignment reached by the fully inflated balloon until stabilization of the vertebral body by PMMA-based cementation. Restoration of the physiological vertebral body height for pain relief and for preventing further fractures of adjacent and distant vertebral bodies must be the main aim for such a method. A new vertebral body stenting system (VBS) stabilizes the vertebral body after balloon deflation until cementation. The radiographic and safety results of the first 100 cases where VBS was applied are presented. METHODS: During the planning phase of an ongoing international multicenter RCT, radiographic, procedural and followup details were retrospectively transcribed from charts and xrays for developing and testing the case report forms. Radiographs were centrally assessed at the institution of the first/senior author. RESULTS: 100 patients (62 with osteoporosis) with a total of 103 fractured vertebral bodies were treated with the VBS system. 49 were females with a mean age of 73.2 years; males were 66.7 years old. The mean preoperative anterior-middle-posterior heights were 20.3-17.6-28.0 mm, respectively. The mean local kyphotic angle was 13.1°. The mean preoperative Beck Index (anterior edge height/posterior edge height) was 0.73, the mean alternative Beck Index (middle height/posterior edge height) was 0.63. The mean postoperative heights were restored to 24.5-24.6-30.4 mm, respectively. The mean local kyphotic angle was reduced to 8.9°. The mean postoperative Beck Index was 0.81, the mean alternative one was 0.82. The overall extrusion rate was 29.1%, the symptomatic one was 1%. In the osteoporosis subgroup there were 23.8% extrusions. Within the three months followup interval there were 9% of adjacent and 4% of remote new fractures, all in the osteoporotic group. CONCLUSIONS: VBS showed its strengths especially in realignment of crush and biconcave fractures. Given that fracture mobility is present, the realignment potential is sound and increases with the severity of preoperative vertebral body deformation. BioMed Central 2013-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3751159/ /pubmed/23927056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-233 Text en Copyright © 2013 Diel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Diel, Peter
Röder, Christoph
Perler, Gosia
Vordemvenne, Thomas
Scholz, Matti
Kandziora, Frank
Fürderer, Sebastian
Eiskjaer, Soren
Maestretti, Gianluca
Rotter, Robert
Benneker, Lorin Michael
Heini, Paul Friedhelm
Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
title Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
title_full Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
title_fullStr Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
title_full_unstemmed Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
title_short Radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
title_sort radiographic and safety details of vertebral body stenting: results from a multicenter chart review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-233
work_keys_str_mv AT dielpeter radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT roderchristoph radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT perlergosia radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT vordemvennethomas radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT scholzmatti radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT kandziorafrank radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT furderersebastian radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT eiskjaersoren radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT maestrettigianluca radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT rotterrobert radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT bennekerlorinmichael radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview
AT heinipaulfriedhelm radiographicandsafetydetailsofvertebralbodystentingresultsfromamulticenterchartreview