Cargando…

The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising treatment option for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between baseline nutritional assessment with s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vashi, Pankaj G, Gupta, Digant, Lammersfeld, Carolyn A, Braun, Donald P, Popiel, Brenten, Misra, Subhasis, Brown, Komen C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23941331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-118
_version_ 1782281548678037504
author Vashi, Pankaj G
Gupta, Digant
Lammersfeld, Carolyn A
Braun, Donald P
Popiel, Brenten
Misra, Subhasis
Brown, Komen C
author_facet Vashi, Pankaj G
Gupta, Digant
Lammersfeld, Carolyn A
Braun, Donald P
Popiel, Brenten
Misra, Subhasis
Brown, Komen C
author_sort Vashi, Pankaj G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising treatment option for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between baseline nutritional assessment with subsequent parenteral nutritional (PN) and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. METHODS: A consecutive series of 60 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at our institution between January 2009 and May 2011. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) was used to assess nutritional status. Patients were classified preoperatively as: well nourished (SGA-A), mildly-moderately malnourished (SGA-B), and severely malnourished (SGA-C). For PN, patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received PN (PN+) and those who did not receive PN (PN-). The primary outcomes of interest were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, ECOG performance status (PS) and survival. LOS was calculated as the number of days in the hospital post surgery. Performance status was measured on a scale of 0-4. Survival was calculated from the date of first visit to the date of death/last contact. RESULTS: Of 60 patients, 19 were males and 41 females. The mean age at presentation was 50.3 years. The most common cancer types were colorectal (n = 24) and gynecologic (n = 19) with the majority of patients (n = 47) treated previously before coming to our institution. 33 patients were SGA-A, 22 SGA-B and 5 SGA-C prior to surgery. Of a total of 60 patients, 31 received PN. Mean LOS for the entire cohort was 16.2 days (SD = 9.8). Mean LOS for preoperative SGA-A, SGA-B and SGA-C were 15.0, 15.2 and 27.8 days respectively (ANOVA p = 0.02). Overall incidence of complications was 26.7% (16/60). Complications were recorded in 9 of 33 (27.3%) preoperative SGA-A patients and 7 of 27 (25.9%) SGA-B + C patients (p = 0.91). The median overall survival was 17.5 months (95% CI = 13.0 to 22.1 months). Median survival for preoperative SGA-A and SGA-B + C cohorts was 22.4 and 10.4 months respectively (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative SGA predicts LOS and survival in cancer patients undergoing HIPEC. Future randomized clinical trials in this patient population should investigate the systematic provision of PN to all malnourished patients in the preoperative period for a minimum of 7-10 days with the continuation of PN in the postoperative period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37511792013-08-24 The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy Vashi, Pankaj G Gupta, Digant Lammersfeld, Carolyn A Braun, Donald P Popiel, Brenten Misra, Subhasis Brown, Komen C Nutr J Research BACKGROUND: The combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising treatment option for selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between baseline nutritional assessment with subsequent parenteral nutritional (PN) and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC. METHODS: A consecutive series of 60 patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC at our institution between January 2009 and May 2011. Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) was used to assess nutritional status. Patients were classified preoperatively as: well nourished (SGA-A), mildly-moderately malnourished (SGA-B), and severely malnourished (SGA-C). For PN, patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received PN (PN+) and those who did not receive PN (PN-). The primary outcomes of interest were length of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, ECOG performance status (PS) and survival. LOS was calculated as the number of days in the hospital post surgery. Performance status was measured on a scale of 0-4. Survival was calculated from the date of first visit to the date of death/last contact. RESULTS: Of 60 patients, 19 were males and 41 females. The mean age at presentation was 50.3 years. The most common cancer types were colorectal (n = 24) and gynecologic (n = 19) with the majority of patients (n = 47) treated previously before coming to our institution. 33 patients were SGA-A, 22 SGA-B and 5 SGA-C prior to surgery. Of a total of 60 patients, 31 received PN. Mean LOS for the entire cohort was 16.2 days (SD = 9.8). Mean LOS for preoperative SGA-A, SGA-B and SGA-C were 15.0, 15.2 and 27.8 days respectively (ANOVA p = 0.02). Overall incidence of complications was 26.7% (16/60). Complications were recorded in 9 of 33 (27.3%) preoperative SGA-A patients and 7 of 27 (25.9%) SGA-B + C patients (p = 0.91). The median overall survival was 17.5 months (95% CI = 13.0 to 22.1 months). Median survival for preoperative SGA-A and SGA-B + C cohorts was 22.4 and 10.4 months respectively (p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative SGA predicts LOS and survival in cancer patients undergoing HIPEC. Future randomized clinical trials in this patient population should investigate the systematic provision of PN to all malnourished patients in the preoperative period for a minimum of 7-10 days with the continuation of PN in the postoperative period. BioMed Central 2013-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3751179/ /pubmed/23941331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-118 Text en Copyright © 2013 Vashi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Vashi, Pankaj G
Gupta, Digant
Lammersfeld, Carolyn A
Braun, Donald P
Popiel, Brenten
Misra, Subhasis
Brown, Komen C
The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
title The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
title_full The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
title_fullStr The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
title_short The relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
title_sort relationship between baseline nutritional status with subsequent parenteral nutrition and clinical outcomes in cancer patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23941331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-12-118
work_keys_str_mv AT vashipankajg therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT guptadigant therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT lammersfeldcarolyna therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT braundonaldp therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT popielbrenten therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT misrasubhasis therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT brownkomenc therelationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT vashipankajg relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT guptadigant relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT lammersfeldcarolyna relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT braundonaldp relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT popielbrenten relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT misrasubhasis relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy
AT brownkomenc relationshipbetweenbaselinenutritionalstatuswithsubsequentparenteralnutritionandclinicaloutcomesincancerpatientsundergoinghyperthermicintraperitonealchemotherapy