Cargando…

Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors

BACKGROUND: Falls are a prevalent issue in the geriatric population and can result in damaging physical and psychological consequences. Fall risk assessment can provide information to enable appropriate interventions for those at risk of falling. Wearable inertial-sensor-based systems can provide qu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Howcroft, Jennifer, Kofman, Jonathan, Lemaire, Edward D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-91
_version_ 1782281549657407488
author Howcroft, Jennifer
Kofman, Jonathan
Lemaire, Edward D
author_facet Howcroft, Jennifer
Kofman, Jonathan
Lemaire, Edward D
author_sort Howcroft, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Falls are a prevalent issue in the geriatric population and can result in damaging physical and psychological consequences. Fall risk assessment can provide information to enable appropriate interventions for those at risk of falling. Wearable inertial-sensor-based systems can provide quantitative measures indicative of fall risk in the geriatric population. METHODS: Forty studies that used inertial sensors to evaluate geriatric fall risk were reviewed and pertinent methodological features were extracted; including, sensor placement, derived parameters used to assess fall risk, fall risk classification method, and fall risk classification model outcomes. RESULTS: Inertial sensors were placed only on the lower back in the majority of papers (65%). One hundred and thirty distinct variables were assessed, which were categorized as position and angle (7.7%), angular velocity (11.5%), linear acceleration (20%), spatial (3.8%), temporal (23.1%), energy (3.8%), frequency (15.4%), and other (14.6%). Fallers were classified using retrospective fall history (30%), prospective fall occurrence (15%), and clinical assessment (32.5%), with 22.5% using a combination of retrospective fall occurrence and clinical assessments. Half of the studies derived models for fall risk prediction, which reached high levels of accuracy (62-100%), specificity (35-100%), and sensitivity (55-99%). CONCLUSIONS: Inertial sensors are promising sensors for fall risk assessment. Future studies should identify fallers using prospective techniques and focus on determining the most promising sensor sites, in conjunction with determination of optimally predictive variables. Further research should also attempt to link predictive variables to specific fall risk factors and investigate disease populations that are at high risk of falls.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37511842013-08-24 Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors Howcroft, Jennifer Kofman, Jonathan Lemaire, Edward D J Neuroeng Rehabil Review BACKGROUND: Falls are a prevalent issue in the geriatric population and can result in damaging physical and psychological consequences. Fall risk assessment can provide information to enable appropriate interventions for those at risk of falling. Wearable inertial-sensor-based systems can provide quantitative measures indicative of fall risk in the geriatric population. METHODS: Forty studies that used inertial sensors to evaluate geriatric fall risk were reviewed and pertinent methodological features were extracted; including, sensor placement, derived parameters used to assess fall risk, fall risk classification method, and fall risk classification model outcomes. RESULTS: Inertial sensors were placed only on the lower back in the majority of papers (65%). One hundred and thirty distinct variables were assessed, which were categorized as position and angle (7.7%), angular velocity (11.5%), linear acceleration (20%), spatial (3.8%), temporal (23.1%), energy (3.8%), frequency (15.4%), and other (14.6%). Fallers were classified using retrospective fall history (30%), prospective fall occurrence (15%), and clinical assessment (32.5%), with 22.5% using a combination of retrospective fall occurrence and clinical assessments. Half of the studies derived models for fall risk prediction, which reached high levels of accuracy (62-100%), specificity (35-100%), and sensitivity (55-99%). CONCLUSIONS: Inertial sensors are promising sensors for fall risk assessment. Future studies should identify fallers using prospective techniques and focus on determining the most promising sensor sites, in conjunction with determination of optimally predictive variables. Further research should also attempt to link predictive variables to specific fall risk factors and investigate disease populations that are at high risk of falls. BioMed Central 2013-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3751184/ /pubmed/23927446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-91 Text en Copyright © 2013 Howcroft et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Howcroft, Jennifer
Kofman, Jonathan
Lemaire, Edward D
Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
title Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
title_full Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
title_fullStr Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
title_full_unstemmed Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
title_short Review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
title_sort review of fall risk assessment in geriatric populations using inertial sensors
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23927446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-91
work_keys_str_mv AT howcroftjennifer reviewoffallriskassessmentingeriatricpopulationsusinginertialsensors
AT kofmanjonathan reviewoffallriskassessmentingeriatricpopulationsusinginertialsensors
AT lemaireedwardd reviewoffallriskassessmentingeriatricpopulationsusinginertialsensors