Cargando…
Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
BACKGROUND: Does below-knee symptomatic muscular (gastrocnemius or soleus) vein thrombosis (MVT) warrant investigation and treatment in post-operative orthopaedic patients? We performed a literature search and evaluated the evidence looking for guidance regarding this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0241-3 |
_version_ | 1782281576129757184 |
---|---|
author | Pengas, Ioannis Nash, William Reed, Natasha Kumar, Sunil |
author_facet | Pengas, Ioannis Nash, William Reed, Natasha Kumar, Sunil |
author_sort | Pengas, Ioannis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Does below-knee symptomatic muscular (gastrocnemius or soleus) vein thrombosis (MVT) warrant investigation and treatment in post-operative orthopaedic patients? We performed a literature search and evaluated the evidence looking for guidance regarding this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search with the use of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar from 1950 to September 2011. Search terms included “muscular vein thrombosis” (MVT) and “isolated gastrocnemius or soleus vein thrombosis” (IGSVT). We reviewed the eight level II studies relevant to our search, only one of which was in a specific orthopaedic population. RESULTS: Studies looking at the rates of progression of isolated MVT have shown conflicting results. There is also a lack of consensus between studies that compare progression amongst groups with or without anticoagulant treatment. The majority of the studies do not distinguish between medical, surgical or orthopaedic patients. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot confidently recommend commencement of anticoagulation treatment upon identification of MVT in post-operative orthopaedic patients. We can only suggest that, once MVT is diagnosed, the patient should undergo serial ultrasound scan (USS) duplex scans, and if propagation is identified, then treatment may be deemed beneficial. Level of evidence: III (review of non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up studies). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3751324 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37513242013-08-27 Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients Pengas, Ioannis Nash, William Reed, Natasha Kumar, Sunil J Orthop Traumatol Review Article BACKGROUND: Does below-knee symptomatic muscular (gastrocnemius or soleus) vein thrombosis (MVT) warrant investigation and treatment in post-operative orthopaedic patients? We performed a literature search and evaluated the evidence looking for guidance regarding this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search with the use of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar from 1950 to September 2011. Search terms included “muscular vein thrombosis” (MVT) and “isolated gastrocnemius or soleus vein thrombosis” (IGSVT). We reviewed the eight level II studies relevant to our search, only one of which was in a specific orthopaedic population. RESULTS: Studies looking at the rates of progression of isolated MVT have shown conflicting results. There is also a lack of consensus between studies that compare progression amongst groups with or without anticoagulant treatment. The majority of the studies do not distinguish between medical, surgical or orthopaedic patients. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot confidently recommend commencement of anticoagulation treatment upon identification of MVT in post-operative orthopaedic patients. We can only suggest that, once MVT is diagnosed, the patient should undergo serial ultrasound scan (USS) duplex scans, and if propagation is identified, then treatment may be deemed beneficial. Level of evidence: III (review of non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up studies). Springer International Publishing 2013-05-07 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3751324/ /pubmed/23649817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0241-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pengas, Ioannis Nash, William Reed, Natasha Kumar, Sunil Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
title | Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
title_full | Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
title_fullStr | Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
title_short | Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
title_sort | evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751324/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0241-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pengasioannis evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients AT nashwilliam evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients AT reednatasha evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients AT kumarsunil evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients |