Cargando…

Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients

BACKGROUND: Does below-knee symptomatic muscular (gastrocnemius or soleus) vein thrombosis (MVT) warrant investigation and treatment in post-operative orthopaedic patients? We performed a literature search and evaluated the evidence looking for guidance regarding this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pengas, Ioannis, Nash, William, Reed, Natasha, Kumar, Sunil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0241-3
_version_ 1782281576129757184
author Pengas, Ioannis
Nash, William
Reed, Natasha
Kumar, Sunil
author_facet Pengas, Ioannis
Nash, William
Reed, Natasha
Kumar, Sunil
author_sort Pengas, Ioannis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Does below-knee symptomatic muscular (gastrocnemius or soleus) vein thrombosis (MVT) warrant investigation and treatment in post-operative orthopaedic patients? We performed a literature search and evaluated the evidence looking for guidance regarding this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search with the use of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar from 1950 to September 2011. Search terms included “muscular vein thrombosis” (MVT) and “isolated gastrocnemius or soleus vein thrombosis” (IGSVT). We reviewed the eight level II studies relevant to our search, only one of which was in a specific orthopaedic population. RESULTS: Studies looking at the rates of progression of isolated MVT have shown conflicting results. There is also a lack of consensus between studies that compare progression amongst groups with or without anticoagulant treatment. The majority of the studies do not distinguish between medical, surgical or orthopaedic patients. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot confidently recommend commencement of anticoagulation treatment upon identification of MVT in post-operative orthopaedic patients. We can only suggest that, once MVT is diagnosed, the patient should undergo serial ultrasound scan (USS) duplex scans, and if propagation is identified, then treatment may be deemed beneficial. Level of evidence: III (review of non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up studies).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751324
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37513242013-08-27 Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients Pengas, Ioannis Nash, William Reed, Natasha Kumar, Sunil J Orthop Traumatol Review Article BACKGROUND: Does below-knee symptomatic muscular (gastrocnemius or soleus) vein thrombosis (MVT) warrant investigation and treatment in post-operative orthopaedic patients? We performed a literature search and evaluated the evidence looking for guidance regarding this question. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a literature search with the use of PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar from 1950 to September 2011. Search terms included “muscular vein thrombosis” (MVT) and “isolated gastrocnemius or soleus vein thrombosis” (IGSVT). We reviewed the eight level II studies relevant to our search, only one of which was in a specific orthopaedic population. RESULTS: Studies looking at the rates of progression of isolated MVT have shown conflicting results. There is also a lack of consensus between studies that compare progression amongst groups with or without anticoagulant treatment. The majority of the studies do not distinguish between medical, surgical or orthopaedic patients. CONCLUSIONS: We cannot confidently recommend commencement of anticoagulation treatment upon identification of MVT in post-operative orthopaedic patients. We can only suggest that, once MVT is diagnosed, the patient should undergo serial ultrasound scan (USS) duplex scans, and if propagation is identified, then treatment may be deemed beneficial. Level of evidence: III (review of non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up studies). Springer International Publishing 2013-05-07 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3751324/ /pubmed/23649817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0241-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Pengas, Ioannis
Nash, William
Reed, Natasha
Kumar, Sunil
Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
title Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
title_full Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
title_fullStr Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
title_short Evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
title_sort evidence for treatment of muscular vein thrombosis in orthopaedic patients
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751324/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23649817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-013-0241-3
work_keys_str_mv AT pengasioannis evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients
AT nashwilliam evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients
AT reednatasha evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients
AT kumarsunil evidencefortreatmentofmuscularveinthrombosisinorthopaedicpatients