Cargando…

The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities

BACKGROUND: Although significant progress has been achieved in developing sensory augmentation methods to improve standing balance, attempts to extend this research to locomotion have been quite limited in scope. The goal of this study was to characterize the effects of two real-time feedback displa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sienko, Kathleen H, Balkwill, M David, Oddsson, Lars I E, Wall, Conrad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23938136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-93
_version_ 1782281581451280384
author Sienko, Kathleen H
Balkwill, M David
Oddsson, Lars I E
Wall, Conrad
author_facet Sienko, Kathleen H
Balkwill, M David
Oddsson, Lars I E
Wall, Conrad
author_sort Sienko, Kathleen H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although significant progress has been achieved in developing sensory augmentation methods to improve standing balance, attempts to extend this research to locomotion have been quite limited in scope. The goal of this study was to characterize the effects of two real-time feedback displays on locomotor performance during four gait-based tasks ranging in difficulty. METHODS: Seven subjects with vestibular deficits used a trunk-based vibrotactile feedback system that provided real-time feedback regarding their medial-lateral (M/L) trunk tilt when they exceeded a subject-specific predefined tilt threshold during slow and self-paced walking, walking along a narrow walkway, and walking on a foam surface. Two feedback display configurations were evaluated: the continuous display provided real-time continuous feedback of trunk tilt, and the gated display provided feedback for 200 ms during the period immediately following heel strike. The root-mean-square (RMS) trunk tilt and percentage of time below the tilt thresholds were calculated for all locomotor tasks. RESULTS: Use of continuous feedback resulted in significant decreases in M/L trunk tilt and increases in percentage times below the tilt thresholds during narrow and foam trials. The gated display produced generally smaller changes. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrated that use of continuous vibrotactile feedback during challenging locomotor tasks allowed subjects with vestibular deficits to significantly decrease M/L RMS trunk tilt. Analysis of the results also showed that continuous feedback was superior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37513492013-08-24 The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities Sienko, Kathleen H Balkwill, M David Oddsson, Lars I E Wall, Conrad J Neuroeng Rehabil Short Report BACKGROUND: Although significant progress has been achieved in developing sensory augmentation methods to improve standing balance, attempts to extend this research to locomotion have been quite limited in scope. The goal of this study was to characterize the effects of two real-time feedback displays on locomotor performance during four gait-based tasks ranging in difficulty. METHODS: Seven subjects with vestibular deficits used a trunk-based vibrotactile feedback system that provided real-time feedback regarding their medial-lateral (M/L) trunk tilt when they exceeded a subject-specific predefined tilt threshold during slow and self-paced walking, walking along a narrow walkway, and walking on a foam surface. Two feedback display configurations were evaluated: the continuous display provided real-time continuous feedback of trunk tilt, and the gated display provided feedback for 200 ms during the period immediately following heel strike. The root-mean-square (RMS) trunk tilt and percentage of time below the tilt thresholds were calculated for all locomotor tasks. RESULTS: Use of continuous feedback resulted in significant decreases in M/L trunk tilt and increases in percentage times below the tilt thresholds during narrow and foam trials. The gated display produced generally smaller changes. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrated that use of continuous vibrotactile feedback during challenging locomotor tasks allowed subjects with vestibular deficits to significantly decrease M/L RMS trunk tilt. Analysis of the results also showed that continuous feedback was superior. BioMed Central 2013-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3751349/ /pubmed/23938136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-93 Text en Copyright © 2013 Sienko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Sienko, Kathleen H
Balkwill, M David
Oddsson, Lars I E
Wall, Conrad
The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
title The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
title_full The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
title_fullStr The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
title_full_unstemmed The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
title_short The effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
title_sort effect of vibrotactile feedback on postural sway during locomotor activities
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23938136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-93
work_keys_str_mv AT sienkokathleenh theeffectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT balkwillmdavid theeffectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT oddssonlarsie theeffectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT wallconrad theeffectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT sienkokathleenh effectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT balkwillmdavid effectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT oddssonlarsie effectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities
AT wallconrad effectofvibrotactilefeedbackonposturalswayduringlocomotoractivities