Cargando…

The attitudes of people with sarcoma and their family towards genomics and incidental information arising from genetic research

PURPOSE: The study aimed to examine attitudes of individuals diagnosed with sarcoma and their family members towards genetics, genomic research and incidental information arising as a result of participating in genetic research. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 1200 individuals from the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Mary-Anne, Herlihy, Amy, Mitchell, Gillian, Thomas, David M, Ballinger, Mandy, Tucker, Kathy, Lewis, Craig R, Neuhaus, Susan, Halliday, Jane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23898988
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-3329-3-11
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The study aimed to examine attitudes of individuals diagnosed with sarcoma and their family members towards genetics, genomic research and incidental information arising as a result of participating in genetic research. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to 1200 individuals from the International Sarcoma Kindred Study (ISKS). Respondents were divided into three groups: individuals affected with sarcoma (probands), their spouses and family members. RESULTS: Approximately half of all research participants felt positively towards new discoveries in human genetics. Overall, more were positive in their attitudes towards genetic testing for inherited conditions (60%) but family members were less so. Older participants reported more highly positive attitudes more often than younger participants. Males were less likely to feel positive about new genetic discoveries and more likely to believe they could modify genetic risk by altering lifestyle factors. Almost all ISKS participants believed participants would like to be given ancillary information arising as a result of participating in genetic research. CONCLUSIONS: The only difference between the study groups was the decreased likelihood of family members being highly positive about genetic testing. This may be important if predictive testing for sarcoma becomes available. Generally ISKS research participants supported the notion of returning incidental genetic information to research participants.