Cargando…

Activation state-dependent interaction between Gα(q) subunits and the Fhit tumor suppressor

BACKGROUND: The FHIT tumor suppressor gene is arguably the most commonly altered gene in cancer since it is inactivated in about 60% of human tumors. The Fhit protein is a member of the ubiquitous histidine triad proteins which hydrolyze dinucleoside polyphosphates such as Ap(3)A. Despite the fact t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zuo, Hao, Chan, Grace P W, Zhu, Jing, Yeung, Wendy W S, Chan, Anthony S L, Ammer, Hermann, Wong, Yung H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751744/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23947369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-811X-11-59
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The FHIT tumor suppressor gene is arguably the most commonly altered gene in cancer since it is inactivated in about 60% of human tumors. The Fhit protein is a member of the ubiquitous histidine triad proteins which hydrolyze dinucleoside polyphosphates such as Ap(3)A. Despite the fact that Fhit functions as a tumor suppressor, the pathway through which Fhit inhibits growth of cancer cells remains largely unknown. Phosphorylation by Src tyrosine kinases provides a linkage between Fhit and growth factor signaling. Since many G proteins can regulate cell proliferation through multiple signaling components including Src, we explored the relationship between Gα subunits and Fhit. RESULTS: Several members of the Gα(q) subfamily (Gα(16), Gα(14), and Gα(q)) were found to co-immunoprecipitate with Fhit in their GTP-bound active state in HEK293 cells. The binding of activated Gα(q) members to Fhit appeared to be direct and was detectable in native DLD-1 colon carcinoma cells. The use of Gα(16/z) chimeras further enabled the mapping of the Fhit-interacting domain to the α2-β4 region of Gα(16). However, Gα(q)/Fhit did not affect either Ap(3)A binding and hydrolysis by Fhit, or the ability of Gα(q/16) to regulate downstream effectors including phospholipase Cβ, Ras, ERK, STAT3, and IKK. Functional mutants of Fhit including the H96D, Y114F, L25W and L25W/I10W showed comparable abilities to associate with Gα(q). Despite the lack of functional regulation of G(q) signaling by Fhit, stimulation of G(q)-coupled receptors in HEK293 and H1299 cells stably overexpressing Fhit led to reduced cell proliferation, as opposed to an enhanced cell proliferation typically seen with parental cells. CONCLUSIONS: Activated Gα(q) members interact with Fhit through their α2-β4 region which may result in enhancement of the growth inhibitory effect of Fhit, thus providing a possible avenue for G protein-coupled receptors to modulate tumor suppression.