Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bondarenko, Igor, Gladkov, Oleg A, Elsaesser, Reiner, Buchner, Anton, Bias, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-386
_version_ 1782281662353113088
author Bondarenko, Igor
Gladkov, Oleg A
Elsaesser, Reiner
Buchner, Anton
Bias, Peter
author_facet Bondarenko, Igor
Gladkov, Oleg A
Elsaesser, Reiner
Buchner, Anton
Bias, Peter
author_sort Bondarenko, Igor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 × 10(9) cells/L were randomized to a single 6-mg subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim (n = 101) or pegfilgrastim (n = 101) on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1. RESULTS: Cycle 1: The mean duration of severe neutropenia for the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups was 0.7 and 0.8 days, respectively (λ = −0.218 [95% confidence interval: –0.498%, 0.062%], p = 0.126), and no severe neutropenia was observed in 56% and 49% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. All cycles: In the efficacy population, febrile neutropenia occurred in three pegfilgrastim-treated patients (all in cycle 1) and zero lipegfilgrastim-treated patients. Drug-related adverse events in the safety population were reported in 28% and 26% of patients i006E the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that lipegfilgrastim 6 mg is as effective as pegfilgrastim in reducing neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Eudra EEACTA200901599910 The study protocol, two global amendments (Nos. 1 and 2), informed consent documents, and other appropriate study-related documents were reviewed and approved by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine Central Ethics Committee and local independent ethics committees (IECs).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37517562013-08-24 Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy Bondarenko, Igor Gladkov, Oleg A Elsaesser, Reiner Buchner, Anton Bias, Peter BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Lipegfilgrastim is a novel glyco-pegylated granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in development for neutropenia prophylaxis in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. This phase III, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled, noninferiority trial compared the efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim in chemotherapy-naïve breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with high-risk stage II, III, or IV breast cancer and an absolute neutrophil count ≥1.5 × 10(9) cells/L were randomized to a single 6-mg subcutaneous injection of lipegfilgrastim (n = 101) or pegfilgrastim (n = 101) on day 2 of each 21-day chemotherapy cycle (4 cycles maximum). The primary efficacy endpoint was the duration of severe neutropenia during cycle 1. RESULTS: Cycle 1: The mean duration of severe neutropenia for the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups was 0.7 and 0.8 days, respectively (λ = −0.218 [95% confidence interval: –0.498%, 0.062%], p = 0.126), and no severe neutropenia was observed in 56% and 49% of patients in the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. All cycles: In the efficacy population, febrile neutropenia occurred in three pegfilgrastim-treated patients (all in cycle 1) and zero lipegfilgrastim-treated patients. Drug-related adverse events in the safety population were reported in 28% and 26% of patients i006E the lipegfilgrastim and pegfilgrastim groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that lipegfilgrastim 6 mg is as effective as pegfilgrastim in reducing neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Eudra EEACTA200901599910 The study protocol, two global amendments (Nos. 1 and 2), informed consent documents, and other appropriate study-related documents were reviewed and approved by the Ministry of Health of Ukraine Central Ethics Committee and local independent ethics committees (IECs). BioMed Central 2013-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3751756/ /pubmed/23945072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-386 Text en Copyright © 2013 Bondarenko et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bondarenko, Igor
Gladkov, Oleg A
Elsaesser, Reiner
Buchner, Anton
Bias, Peter
Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
title Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
title_full Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
title_short Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
title_sort efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23945072
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-13-386
work_keys_str_mv AT bondarenkoigor efficacyandsafetyoflipegfilgrastimversuspegfilgrastimarandomizedmulticenteractivecontrolphase3trialinpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingdoxorubicindocetaxelchemotherapy
AT gladkovolega efficacyandsafetyoflipegfilgrastimversuspegfilgrastimarandomizedmulticenteractivecontrolphase3trialinpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingdoxorubicindocetaxelchemotherapy
AT elsaesserreiner efficacyandsafetyoflipegfilgrastimversuspegfilgrastimarandomizedmulticenteractivecontrolphase3trialinpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingdoxorubicindocetaxelchemotherapy
AT buchneranton efficacyandsafetyoflipegfilgrastimversuspegfilgrastimarandomizedmulticenteractivecontrolphase3trialinpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingdoxorubicindocetaxelchemotherapy
AT biaspeter efficacyandsafetyoflipegfilgrastimversuspegfilgrastimarandomizedmulticenteractivecontrolphase3trialinpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingdoxorubicindocetaxelchemotherapy