Cargando…

The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams

BACKGROUND: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seys, Deborah, Deneckere, Svin, Sermeus, Walter, Gerven, Eva Van, Panella, Massimiliano, Bruyneel, Luk, Mutsvari, Timothy, Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho, Kul, Seval, Vanhaecht, Kris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-325
_version_ 1782281700901912576
author Seys, Deborah
Deneckere, Svin
Sermeus, Walter
Gerven, Eva Van
Panella, Massimiliano
Bruyneel, Luk
Mutsvari, Timothy
Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho
Kul, Seval
Vanhaecht, Kris
author_facet Seys, Deborah
Deneckere, Svin
Sermeus, Walter
Gerven, Eva Van
Panella, Massimiliano
Bruyneel, Luk
Mutsvari, Timothy
Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho
Kul, Seval
Vanhaecht, Kris
author_sort Seys, Deborah
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated. RESULTS: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751913
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37519132013-08-24 The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams Seys, Deborah Deneckere, Svin Sermeus, Walter Gerven, Eva Van Panella, Massimiliano Bruyneel, Luk Mutsvari, Timothy Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho Kul, Seval Vanhaecht, Kris BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated. RESULTS: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams. BioMed Central 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3751913/ /pubmed/23958206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-325 Text en Copyright © 2013 Seys et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Seys, Deborah
Deneckere, Svin
Sermeus, Walter
Gerven, Eva Van
Panella, Massimiliano
Bruyneel, Luk
Mutsvari, Timothy
Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho
Kul, Seval
Vanhaecht, Kris
The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
title The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
title_full The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
title_fullStr The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
title_full_unstemmed The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
title_short The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
title_sort care process self-evaluation tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751913/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958206
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-325
work_keys_str_mv AT seysdeborah thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT deneckeresvin thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT sermeuswalter thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT gervenevavan thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT panellamassimiliano thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT bruyneelluk thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT mutsvaritimothy thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT bejaranorafaelacamacho thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT kulseval thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT vanhaechtkris thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT seysdeborah careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT deneckeresvin careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT sermeuswalter careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT gervenevavan careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT panellamassimiliano careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT bruyneelluk careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT mutsvaritimothy careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT bejaranorafaelacamacho careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT kulseval careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams
AT vanhaechtkris careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams