Cargando…
The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams
BACKGROUND: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-325 |
_version_ | 1782281700901912576 |
---|---|
author | Seys, Deborah Deneckere, Svin Sermeus, Walter Gerven, Eva Van Panella, Massimiliano Bruyneel, Luk Mutsvari, Timothy Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho Kul, Seval Vanhaecht, Kris |
author_facet | Seys, Deborah Deneckere, Svin Sermeus, Walter Gerven, Eva Van Panella, Massimiliano Bruyneel, Luk Mutsvari, Timothy Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho Kul, Seval Vanhaecht, Kris |
author_sort | Seys, Deborah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated. RESULTS: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3751913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-37519132013-08-24 The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams Seys, Deborah Deneckere, Svin Sermeus, Walter Gerven, Eva Van Panella, Massimiliano Bruyneel, Luk Mutsvari, Timothy Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho Kul, Seval Vanhaecht, Kris BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient safety can be increased by improving the organization of care. A tool that evaluates the actual organization of care, as perceived by multidisciplinary teams, is the Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool (CPSET). CPSET was developed in 2007 and includes 29 items in five subscales: (a) patient-focused organization, (b) coordination of the care process, (c) collaboration with primary care, (d) communication with patients and family, and (e) follow-up of the care process. The goal of the present study was to further evaluate the psychometric properties of the CPSET at the team and hospital levels and to compile a cutoff score table. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the CPSET were assessed in a multicenter study in Belgium and the Netherlands. In total, 3139 team members from 114 hospitals participated. Psychometric properties were evaluated by using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), Cronbach’s alpha, interclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), Kruskall-Wallis test, and Mann–Whitney test. For the cutoff score table, percentiles were used. Demographic variables were also evaluated. RESULTS: CFA showed a good model fit: a normed fit index of 0.93, a comparative fit index of 0.94, an adjusted goodness-of-fit index of 0.87, and a root mean square error of approximation of 0.06. Cronbach’s alpha values were between 0.869 and 0.950. The team-level ICCs varied between 0.127 and 0.232 and were higher than those at the hospital level (0.071-0.151). Male team members scored significantly higher than females on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. There were also significant differences among age groups. Medical doctors scored significantly higher on 4 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Coordinators of care processes scored significantly lower on 2 of the 5 subscales and on the overall CPSET. Cutoff scores for all subscales and the overall CPSET were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The CPSET is a valid and reliable instrument for health care teams to measure the extent care processes are organized. The cutoff table permits teams to compare how they perceive the organization of their care process relative to other teams. BioMed Central 2013-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3751913/ /pubmed/23958206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-325 Text en Copyright © 2013 Seys et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Seys, Deborah Deneckere, Svin Sermeus, Walter Gerven, Eva Van Panella, Massimiliano Bruyneel, Luk Mutsvari, Timothy Bejarano, Rafaela Camacho Kul, Seval Vanhaecht, Kris The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
title | The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
title_full | The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
title_fullStr | The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
title_full_unstemmed | The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
title_short | The Care Process Self-Evaluation Tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
title_sort | care process self-evaluation tool: a valid and reliable instrument for measuring care process organization of health care teams |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23958206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT seysdeborah thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT deneckeresvin thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT sermeuswalter thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT gervenevavan thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT panellamassimiliano thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT bruyneelluk thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT mutsvaritimothy thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT bejaranorafaelacamacho thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT kulseval thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT vanhaechtkris thecareprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT seysdeborah careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT deneckeresvin careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT sermeuswalter careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT gervenevavan careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT panellamassimiliano careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT bruyneelluk careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT mutsvaritimothy careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT bejaranorafaelacamacho careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT kulseval careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams AT vanhaechtkris careprocessselfevaluationtoolavalidandreliableinstrumentformeasuringcareprocessorganizationofhealthcareteams |