Cargando…

Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to report thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) measurements and compare them to echocardiography (echo) measurements throughout pregnancy and in varied maternal positions. METHODS: A prospective cohort study involving 28 healthy parturients was performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burlingame, Janet, Ohana, Patrick, Aaronoff, Michael, Seto, Todd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23680787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.35
_version_ 1782281712114335744
author Burlingame, Janet
Ohana, Patrick
Aaronoff, Michael
Seto, Todd
author_facet Burlingame, Janet
Ohana, Patrick
Aaronoff, Michael
Seto, Todd
author_sort Burlingame, Janet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to report thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) measurements and compare them to echocardiography (echo) measurements throughout pregnancy and in varied maternal positions. METHODS: A prospective cohort study involving 28 healthy parturients was performed using ICG and echo at three time points and in two maternal positions. Pearson correlations, Bland-Altman plots and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant agreements between many but not all ICG and echo contractility, flow and resistance measurements were demonstrated. Differences in stroke volume due to maternal position were also detected by ICG in the antepartum period. Significant trends were observed by ICG for cardiac output and thoracic fluid content (TFC) (p < 0.025) with advancing pregnancy stages. CONCLUSIONS: ICG and echo demonstrate significant correlations in some but not all measurements of cardiac function. ICG has the ability to detect small changes in SV associated with maternal position change. ICG measurements reflected maximal cardiac contractility in the antepartum period yet reflected a decrease in contractility and an increase in TFC in the postpartum period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3751992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37519922014-03-01 Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography Burlingame, Janet Ohana, Patrick Aaronoff, Michael Seto, Todd J Perinatol Article OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to report thoracic impedance cardiography (ICG) measurements and compare them to echocardiography (echo) measurements throughout pregnancy and in varied maternal positions. METHODS: A prospective cohort study involving 28 healthy parturients was performed using ICG and echo at three time points and in two maternal positions. Pearson correlations, Bland-Altman plots and paired t-tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Significant agreements between many but not all ICG and echo contractility, flow and resistance measurements were demonstrated. Differences in stroke volume due to maternal position were also detected by ICG in the antepartum period. Significant trends were observed by ICG for cardiac output and thoracic fluid content (TFC) (p < 0.025) with advancing pregnancy stages. CONCLUSIONS: ICG and echo demonstrate significant correlations in some but not all measurements of cardiac function. ICG has the ability to detect small changes in SV associated with maternal position change. ICG measurements reflected maximal cardiac contractility in the antepartum period yet reflected a decrease in contractility and an increase in TFC in the postpartum period. 2013-05-16 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3751992/ /pubmed/23680787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.35 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Burlingame, Janet
Ohana, Patrick
Aaronoff, Michael
Seto, Todd
Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography
title Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography
title_full Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography
title_fullStr Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography
title_short Non-invasive Cardiac Monitoring in Pregnancy: Impedance Cardiography versus Echocardiography
title_sort non-invasive cardiac monitoring in pregnancy: impedance cardiography versus echocardiography
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3751992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23680787
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.35
work_keys_str_mv AT burlingamejanet noninvasivecardiacmonitoringinpregnancyimpedancecardiographyversusechocardiography
AT ohanapatrick noninvasivecardiacmonitoringinpregnancyimpedancecardiographyversusechocardiography
AT aaronoffmichael noninvasivecardiacmonitoringinpregnancyimpedancecardiographyversusechocardiography
AT setotodd noninvasivecardiacmonitoringinpregnancyimpedancecardiographyversusechocardiography