Cargando…

Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the safety, recovery time, and side effects of general anesthesia with different doses of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil. METHODS: One hundred ten patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2 who under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weng, Digui, Huang, Menghua, Jiang, Runnian, Zhan, Rufu, Yang, Chunni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990706
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45979
_version_ 1782281780284358656
author Weng, Digui
Huang, Menghua
Jiang, Runnian
Zhan, Rufu
Yang, Chunni
author_facet Weng, Digui
Huang, Menghua
Jiang, Runnian
Zhan, Rufu
Yang, Chunni
author_sort Weng, Digui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the safety, recovery time, and side effects of general anesthesia with different doses of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil. METHODS: One hundred ten patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2 who underwent gynecological general anesthesia with a 1–3-hour operation time were randomly divided into the following groups: etomidate emulsion group 1 ([E1] n = 30); etomidate emulsion group 2 ([E2] n = 30); etomidate emulsion group 3 ([E3] n = 20); and propofol group ([P group] n = 30). For induction of anesthesia, 0.3 mg/kg etomidate emulsion, and the continuous remifentanil infusion also to induce anesthesia (0.1~0.3 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1)), was applied in all cases. Afterwards, continuous infusion of etomidate emulsion and remifentanil, respectively (E1: 10 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1) and 0.1 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1); E2: 15 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1) and 0.2 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1); E3: 20 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1) and 0.2 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1)), and propofol (P group: 6~10 mg · kg(−1) · h(−1)) were administered. Changes in blood flow kinetics and adverse reactions were noted and compared between the four groups. RESULTS: Both arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) decreased after induction of anesthesia (P < 0.05). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP changed only slightly, and HRs were slightly infected in E1, E2, and E3. SBP, DBP, and HR during the operation all decreased significantly in P group (P < 0.05). Muscle tremor at the time of induction occurred in 13 cases (11.8%). Following etomidate emulsion anesthesia maintenance, postoperative agitation occurred in seven cases (8.75%), lethargy in 20 cases (25%), and vomiting in 19 cases (23.75%). No adverse reactions were found in P group. CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of etomidate emulsion at 10 μg · kg(−1) · minute(−1) combined with remifentanil during anesthesia has the advantages of hemodynamic stability, quick wake-up, and few adverse reactions. Increasing the dose of etomidate emulsion increases the incidence of adverse reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3753064
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37530642013-08-29 Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia Weng, Digui Huang, Menghua Jiang, Runnian Zhan, Rufu Yang, Chunni Drug Des Devel Ther Rapid Communication BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate the safety, recovery time, and side effects of general anesthesia with different doses of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil. METHODS: One hundred ten patients of American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2 who underwent gynecological general anesthesia with a 1–3-hour operation time were randomly divided into the following groups: etomidate emulsion group 1 ([E1] n = 30); etomidate emulsion group 2 ([E2] n = 30); etomidate emulsion group 3 ([E3] n = 20); and propofol group ([P group] n = 30). For induction of anesthesia, 0.3 mg/kg etomidate emulsion, and the continuous remifentanil infusion also to induce anesthesia (0.1~0.3 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1)), was applied in all cases. Afterwards, continuous infusion of etomidate emulsion and remifentanil, respectively (E1: 10 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1) and 0.1 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1); E2: 15 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1) and 0.2 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1); E3: 20 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1) and 0.2 μg · kg(−1) · min(−1)), and propofol (P group: 6~10 mg · kg(−1) · h(−1)) were administered. Changes in blood flow kinetics and adverse reactions were noted and compared between the four groups. RESULTS: Both arterial blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) decreased after induction of anesthesia (P < 0.05). Systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) BP changed only slightly, and HRs were slightly infected in E1, E2, and E3. SBP, DBP, and HR during the operation all decreased significantly in P group (P < 0.05). Muscle tremor at the time of induction occurred in 13 cases (11.8%). Following etomidate emulsion anesthesia maintenance, postoperative agitation occurred in seven cases (8.75%), lethargy in 20 cases (25%), and vomiting in 19 cases (23.75%). No adverse reactions were found in P group. CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion of etomidate emulsion at 10 μg · kg(−1) · minute(−1) combined with remifentanil during anesthesia has the advantages of hemodynamic stability, quick wake-up, and few adverse reactions. Increasing the dose of etomidate emulsion increases the incidence of adverse reactions. Dove Medical Press 2013-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3753064/ /pubmed/23990706 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45979 Text en © 2013 Weng et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Ltd, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Ltd, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Rapid Communication
Weng, Digui
Huang, Menghua
Jiang, Runnian
Zhan, Rufu
Yang, Chunni
Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
title Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
title_full Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
title_fullStr Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
title_short Clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
title_sort clinical study of etomidate emulsion combined with remifentanil in general anesthesia
topic Rapid Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753064/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990706
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S45979
work_keys_str_mv AT wengdigui clinicalstudyofetomidateemulsioncombinedwithremifentanilingeneralanesthesia
AT huangmenghua clinicalstudyofetomidateemulsioncombinedwithremifentanilingeneralanesthesia
AT jiangrunnian clinicalstudyofetomidateemulsioncombinedwithremifentanilingeneralanesthesia
AT zhanrufu clinicalstudyofetomidateemulsioncombinedwithremifentanilingeneralanesthesia
AT yangchunni clinicalstudyofetomidateemulsioncombinedwithremifentanilingeneralanesthesia