Cargando…

Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan

BACKGROUND: The development and implementation of a remediation plan for the residual arsenic trioxide stored at the former Giant Mine site in the Canadian Northwest Territories has raised important issues related to trust. Social and individual trust of those responsible for making decisions on ris...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jardine, Cynthia G., Banfield, Laura, Driedger, S. Michelle, Furgal, Christopher M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21184
_version_ 1782281789023191040
author Jardine, Cynthia G.
Banfield, Laura
Driedger, S. Michelle
Furgal, Christopher M.
author_facet Jardine, Cynthia G.
Banfield, Laura
Driedger, S. Michelle
Furgal, Christopher M.
author_sort Jardine, Cynthia G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development and implementation of a remediation plan for the residual arsenic trioxide stored at the former Giant Mine site in the Canadian Northwest Territories has raised important issues related to trust. Social and individual trust of those responsible for making decisions on risks is critically important in community judgements on risk and the acceptability of risk management decisions. Trust is known to be affected by value similarity and confidence in past performance, which serve as interacting sources of cooperation in acting toward a common goal. OBJECTIVE: To explore the elements of trust associated with the development and implementation of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight purposively selected key informants representing both various interested and affected parties and the two government proponents. RESULTS: Five primary issues related to trust were identified by the participants: (1) a historical legacy of mistrust between the community (particularly Aboriginal peoples) and government; (2) barriers to building trust with the federal government; (3) limited community input and control over the decision-making process; (4) the conflicted and confounded role of the government agencies being both proponent and regulator, and the resulting need for independent oversight; and (5) distrust of the government to commit to the perpetual care required for the remediation option selected. CONCLUSIONS: The dual-mode model of trust and confidence was shown to be a useful framework for understanding the pivotal role of trust in the development of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. Failure to recognize issues of trust based on value dissimilarity and lack of confidence based on past performance have resulted in a lack of cooperation characterized by delayed remediation and a prolonged and expensive consultation process. Government recognition of the importance of trust to these issues will hopefully improve future communication and public engagement endeavours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3753156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37531562013-08-27 Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan Jardine, Cynthia G. Banfield, Laura Driedger, S. Michelle Furgal, Christopher M. Int J Circumpolar Health Supplement 1, 2013 BACKGROUND: The development and implementation of a remediation plan for the residual arsenic trioxide stored at the former Giant Mine site in the Canadian Northwest Territories has raised important issues related to trust. Social and individual trust of those responsible for making decisions on risks is critically important in community judgements on risk and the acceptability of risk management decisions. Trust is known to be affected by value similarity and confidence in past performance, which serve as interacting sources of cooperation in acting toward a common goal. OBJECTIVE: To explore the elements of trust associated with the development and implementation of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. DESIGN: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight purposively selected key informants representing both various interested and affected parties and the two government proponents. RESULTS: Five primary issues related to trust were identified by the participants: (1) a historical legacy of mistrust between the community (particularly Aboriginal peoples) and government; (2) barriers to building trust with the federal government; (3) limited community input and control over the decision-making process; (4) the conflicted and confounded role of the government agencies being both proponent and regulator, and the resulting need for independent oversight; and (5) distrust of the government to commit to the perpetual care required for the remediation option selected. CONCLUSIONS: The dual-mode model of trust and confidence was shown to be a useful framework for understanding the pivotal role of trust in the development of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan. Failure to recognize issues of trust based on value dissimilarity and lack of confidence based on past performance have resulted in a lack of cooperation characterized by delayed remediation and a prolonged and expensive consultation process. Government recognition of the importance of trust to these issues will hopefully improve future communication and public engagement endeavours. Co-Action Publishing 2013-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3753156/ /pubmed/23984297 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21184 Text en © 2013 Cynthia G. Jardine et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement 1, 2013
Jardine, Cynthia G.
Banfield, Laura
Driedger, S. Michelle
Furgal, Christopher M.
Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan
title Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan
title_full Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan
title_fullStr Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan
title_full_unstemmed Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan
title_short Risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the Giant Mine Remediation Plan
title_sort risk communication and trust in decision-maker action: a case study of the giant mine remediation plan
topic Supplement 1, 2013
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23984297
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21184
work_keys_str_mv AT jardinecynthiag riskcommunicationandtrustindecisionmakeractionacasestudyofthegiantmineremediationplan
AT banfieldlaura riskcommunicationandtrustindecisionmakeractionacasestudyofthegiantmineremediationplan
AT driedgersmichelle riskcommunicationandtrustindecisionmakeractionacasestudyofthegiantmineremediationplan
AT furgalchristopherm riskcommunicationandtrustindecisionmakeractionacasestudyofthegiantmineremediationplan