Cargando…

Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns

BACKGROUND: Tests for recent infections (TRIs) are important for HIV surveillance. We have shown that a patient's antibody pattern in a confirmatory line immunoassay (Inno-Lia) also yields information on time since infection. We have published algorithms which, with a certain sensitivity and sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schüpbach, Jörg, Gebhardt, Martin D., Scherrer, Alexandra U., Bisset, Leslie R., Niederhauser, Christoph, Regenass, Stephan, Yerly, Sabine, Aubert, Vincent, Suter, Franziska, Pfister, Stefan, Martinetti, Gladys, Andreutti, Corinne, Klimkait, Thomas, Brandenberger, Marcel, Günthard, Huldrych F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071662
_version_ 1782281813976154112
author Schüpbach, Jörg
Gebhardt, Martin D.
Scherrer, Alexandra U.
Bisset, Leslie R.
Niederhauser, Christoph
Regenass, Stephan
Yerly, Sabine
Aubert, Vincent
Suter, Franziska
Pfister, Stefan
Martinetti, Gladys
Andreutti, Corinne
Klimkait, Thomas
Brandenberger, Marcel
Günthard, Huldrych F.
author_facet Schüpbach, Jörg
Gebhardt, Martin D.
Scherrer, Alexandra U.
Bisset, Leslie R.
Niederhauser, Christoph
Regenass, Stephan
Yerly, Sabine
Aubert, Vincent
Suter, Franziska
Pfister, Stefan
Martinetti, Gladys
Andreutti, Corinne
Klimkait, Thomas
Brandenberger, Marcel
Günthard, Huldrych F.
author_sort Schüpbach, Jörg
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tests for recent infections (TRIs) are important for HIV surveillance. We have shown that a patient's antibody pattern in a confirmatory line immunoassay (Inno-Lia) also yields information on time since infection. We have published algorithms which, with a certain sensitivity and specificity, distinguish between incident (< = 12 months) and older infection. In order to use these algorithms like other TRIs, i.e., based on their windows, we now determined their window periods. METHODS: We classified Inno-Lia results of 527 treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection < = 12 months according to incidence by 25 algorithms. The time after which all infections were ruled older, i.e. the algorithm's window, was determined by linear regression of the proportion ruled incident in dependence of time since infection. Window-based incident infection rates (IIR) were determined utilizing the relationship ‘Prevalence  =  Incidence x Duration’ in four annual cohorts of HIV-1 notifications. Results were compared to performance-based IIR also derived from Inno-Lia results, but utilizing the relationship ‘incident  =  true incident + false incident’ and also to the IIR derived from the BED incidence assay. RESULTS: Window periods varied between 45.8 and 130.1 days and correlated well with the algorithms' diagnostic sensitivity (R(2) = 0.962; P<0.0001). Among the 25 algorithms, the mean window-based IIR among the 748 notifications of 2005/06 was 0.457 compared to 0.453 obtained for performance-based IIR with a model not correcting for selection bias. Evaluation of BED results using a window of 153 days yielded an IIR of 0.669. Window-based IIR and performance-based IIR increased by 22.4% and respectively 30.6% in 2008, while 2009 and 2010 showed a return to baseline for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: IIR estimations by window- and performance-based evaluations of Inno-Lia algorithm results were similar and can be used together to assess IIR changes between annual HIV notification cohorts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3753319
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37533192013-08-29 Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns Schüpbach, Jörg Gebhardt, Martin D. Scherrer, Alexandra U. Bisset, Leslie R. Niederhauser, Christoph Regenass, Stephan Yerly, Sabine Aubert, Vincent Suter, Franziska Pfister, Stefan Martinetti, Gladys Andreutti, Corinne Klimkait, Thomas Brandenberger, Marcel Günthard, Huldrych F. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Tests for recent infections (TRIs) are important for HIV surveillance. We have shown that a patient's antibody pattern in a confirmatory line immunoassay (Inno-Lia) also yields information on time since infection. We have published algorithms which, with a certain sensitivity and specificity, distinguish between incident (< = 12 months) and older infection. In order to use these algorithms like other TRIs, i.e., based on their windows, we now determined their window periods. METHODS: We classified Inno-Lia results of 527 treatment-naïve patients with HIV-1 infection < = 12 months according to incidence by 25 algorithms. The time after which all infections were ruled older, i.e. the algorithm's window, was determined by linear regression of the proportion ruled incident in dependence of time since infection. Window-based incident infection rates (IIR) were determined utilizing the relationship ‘Prevalence  =  Incidence x Duration’ in four annual cohorts of HIV-1 notifications. Results were compared to performance-based IIR also derived from Inno-Lia results, but utilizing the relationship ‘incident  =  true incident + false incident’ and also to the IIR derived from the BED incidence assay. RESULTS: Window periods varied between 45.8 and 130.1 days and correlated well with the algorithms' diagnostic sensitivity (R(2) = 0.962; P<0.0001). Among the 25 algorithms, the mean window-based IIR among the 748 notifications of 2005/06 was 0.457 compared to 0.453 obtained for performance-based IIR with a model not correcting for selection bias. Evaluation of BED results using a window of 153 days yielded an IIR of 0.669. Window-based IIR and performance-based IIR increased by 22.4% and respectively 30.6% in 2008, while 2009 and 2010 showed a return to baseline for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: IIR estimations by window- and performance-based evaluations of Inno-Lia algorithm results were similar and can be used together to assess IIR changes between annual HIV notification cohorts. Public Library of Science 2013-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC3753319/ /pubmed/23990968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071662 Text en © 2013 Schüpbach et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schüpbach, Jörg
Gebhardt, Martin D.
Scherrer, Alexandra U.
Bisset, Leslie R.
Niederhauser, Christoph
Regenass, Stephan
Yerly, Sabine
Aubert, Vincent
Suter, Franziska
Pfister, Stefan
Martinetti, Gladys
Andreutti, Corinne
Klimkait, Thomas
Brandenberger, Marcel
Günthard, Huldrych F.
Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns
title Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns
title_full Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns
title_fullStr Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns
title_full_unstemmed Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns
title_short Simple Estimation of Incident HIV Infection Rates in Notification Cohorts Based on Window Periods of Algorithms for Evaluation of Line-Immunoassay Result Patterns
title_sort simple estimation of incident hiv infection rates in notification cohorts based on window periods of algorithms for evaluation of line-immunoassay result patterns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753319/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23990968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071662
work_keys_str_mv AT schupbachjorg simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT gebhardtmartind simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT scherreralexandrau simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT bissetleslier simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT niederhauserchristoph simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT regenassstephan simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT yerlysabine simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT aubertvincent simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT suterfranziska simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT pfisterstefan simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT martinettigladys simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT andreutticorinne simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT klimkaitthomas simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT brandenbergermarcel simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT gunthardhuldrychf simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns
AT simpleestimationofincidenthivinfectionratesinnotificationcohortsbasedonwindowperiodsofalgorithmsforevaluationoflineimmunoassayresultpatterns