Cargando…
Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: We examined how assessments of risk of bias of primary studies are carried out and incorporated into the statistical analysis and overall findings of a systematic review. DESIGN: A cross-sectional review. SAMPLE: We assessed 200 systematic reviews of randomised trials published between Ja...
Autores principales: | Hopewell, Sally, Boutron, Isabelle, Altman, Douglas G, Ravaud, Philippe |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23975265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003342 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
por: Shah, Kieran, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Risk of bias assessment of randomised controlled trials referenced in the 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care: a cross-sectional review
por: Cho, Yongil, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
A systematic review of the effect of red blood cell transfusion on mortality: evidence from large-scale observational studies published between 2006 and 2010
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Failure to address potential bias in non-randomised controlled clinical trials may cause lack of evidence on patient-reported outcomes: a method study
por: Peinemann, Frank, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Evidence-informed recommendations to reduce dissemination bias in clinical research: conclusions from the OPEN (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) project based on an international consensus meeting
por: Meerpohl, Joerg J, et al.
Publicado: (2015)