Cargando…

Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice

OBJECTIVE: To examine the barriers to, and facilitators in, improving diabetes management from the general practice perspective, in advance of the implementation of an integrated model of care in Ireland. DESIGN: Qualitative using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Primary care in the Republic of I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mc Hugh, Sheena, O'Mullane, Monica, Perry, Ivan J, Bradley, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23959754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003217
_version_ 1782281837774635008
author Mc Hugh, Sheena
O'Mullane, Monica
Perry, Ivan J
Bradley, Colin
author_facet Mc Hugh, Sheena
O'Mullane, Monica
Perry, Ivan J
Bradley, Colin
author_sort Mc Hugh, Sheena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To examine the barriers to, and facilitators in, improving diabetes management from the general practice perspective, in advance of the implementation of an integrated model of care in Ireland. DESIGN: Qualitative using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Primary care in the Republic of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 29 general practitioners (GPs) and two practice nurses. METHODS: Data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: The main barriers and facilitators occurred at the level of the health system but had a ripple effect at an organisational, professional and patient level. The lack of targeted remuneration for diabetes management in the Irish health system created apathy in general practice and was perceived to be indicative of the lack of value placed on chronic disease management in the health system. There were ‘pockets of interest’ among GPs motivated by ‘vocational’ incentives such as a sense of professional duty; however, this was not sufficient to drive widespread improvement. The hospital service was seen as an essential support for primary care management, although some participants referred to emerging tension between settings. The lack of coordination at the primary–secondary interface resulted in avoidable duplication and an ‘in the meantime’ period of uncertainty around when patients would be called or recalled by specialist services. Facilitators included the availability of nursing support and serendipitous access to services. The lack of resources in the community was considered to be at odds with policy to shift routine management to general practice, which is fast reaching saturation. CONCLUSIONS: At present, intrinsic motivation is driving the improvement of diabetes care in Ireland. This will not be sufficient to implement the proposed reform including a national model of integrated care. Policymakers need to assess and prepare for the disparate levels of interest and infrastructure in primary care in Ireland to support this change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3753479
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-37534792013-08-28 Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice Mc Hugh, Sheena O'Mullane, Monica Perry, Ivan J Bradley, Colin BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To examine the barriers to, and facilitators in, improving diabetes management from the general practice perspective, in advance of the implementation of an integrated model of care in Ireland. DESIGN: Qualitative using semistructured interviews. SETTING: Primary care in the Republic of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 29 general practitioners (GPs) and two practice nurses. METHODS: Data were analysed using a framework approach. RESULTS: The main barriers and facilitators occurred at the level of the health system but had a ripple effect at an organisational, professional and patient level. The lack of targeted remuneration for diabetes management in the Irish health system created apathy in general practice and was perceived to be indicative of the lack of value placed on chronic disease management in the health system. There were ‘pockets of interest’ among GPs motivated by ‘vocational’ incentives such as a sense of professional duty; however, this was not sufficient to drive widespread improvement. The hospital service was seen as an essential support for primary care management, although some participants referred to emerging tension between settings. The lack of coordination at the primary–secondary interface resulted in avoidable duplication and an ‘in the meantime’ period of uncertainty around when patients would be called or recalled by specialist services. Facilitators included the availability of nursing support and serendipitous access to services. The lack of resources in the community was considered to be at odds with policy to shift routine management to general practice, which is fast reaching saturation. CONCLUSIONS: At present, intrinsic motivation is driving the improvement of diabetes care in Ireland. This will not be sufficient to implement the proposed reform including a national model of integrated care. Policymakers need to assess and prepare for the disparate levels of interest and infrastructure in primary care in Ireland to support this change. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3753479/ /pubmed/23959754 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003217 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Mc Hugh, Sheena
O'Mullane, Monica
Perry, Ivan J
Bradley, Colin
Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
title Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
title_full Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
title_fullStr Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
title_full_unstemmed Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
title_short Barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in Ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
title_sort barriers to, and facilitators in, introducing integrated diabetes care in ireland: a qualitative study of views in general practice
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3753479/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23959754
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003217
work_keys_str_mv AT mchughsheena barrierstoandfacilitatorsinintroducingintegrateddiabetescareinirelandaqualitativestudyofviewsingeneralpractice
AT omullanemonica barrierstoandfacilitatorsinintroducingintegrateddiabetescareinirelandaqualitativestudyofviewsingeneralpractice
AT perryivanj barrierstoandfacilitatorsinintroducingintegrateddiabetescareinirelandaqualitativestudyofviewsingeneralpractice
AT bradleycolin barrierstoandfacilitatorsinintroducingintegrateddiabetescareinirelandaqualitativestudyofviewsingeneralpractice